Public/Private Distinction in Light of the History of Legal Thought: Contemporary Problems in the Context of Globalization
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper examines the historical legal context of the public/private distinction, arguing that such a distinction — as an urgent issue in the global context — should be understood based on a substantial understanding of the public. As such, the paper utilizes investor-state dispute settlement(ISDS) as an example. In this context, the paper starts by explaining the reason why legal theory should consider public/private distinction as a pressing theoretical issue by proposing ISDS as a striking example. Then, this paper explores the development of the legal theory to articulate the meaning of the public in the context of Europe and America. And it demonstrates that this theoretical examination could provide fruitful insights into addressing contemporary problems such as globalization. Recently, many scholars propose the substantial understanding of the public beyond formalist view of the public/private distinction. The public needs to be considered as a sphere to embrace the state and the private. Finally, the research explains how one could apply this discourse to reformation of the ISDS system in the practical perspectives.
Abstract
This paper examines the historical legal context of the public/private distinction, arguing that such a distinction — as an urgent issue in the global context — should be understood based on a substantial understanding of the public. As such, the paper utilizes investor-state dispute settlement(ISDS) as an example. In this context, the paper starts by explaining the reason why legal theory should consider public/private distinction as a pressing theoretical issue by proposing ISDS as a striking example. Then, this paper explores the development of the legal theory to articulate the meaning of the public in the context of Europe and America. And it demonstrates that this theoretical examination could provide fruitful insights into addressing contemporary problems such as globalization. Recently, many scholars propose the substantial understanding of the public beyond formalist view of the public/private distinction. The public needs to be considered as a sphere to embrace the state and the private. Finally, the research explains how one could apply this discourse to reformation of the ISDS system in the practical perspectives.
참고문헌 (57)
- Armitage, David, "The Declaration of Independence and International Law", THE WM. & MARY Q, 59, pp.39~ (2002)
- Burn, J. H., "Fortescue and the Political Theory of Dominium", THE HISTORICAL J, 28, pp.777~ (1985)
- Castel, J. G., "The Settlement of Disputes under the 1988 Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement", AM. U. INT'L L, 83, pp.118~ (1989)
- Cohen, Morris R., "Property and Sovereignty", CORNELL L.Q, 13, pp.8~ (1928)
- Cushman, Barry, "Rethinking the New Deal Court", VA. L. REV, 80, pp.201~ (1994)
- Cutler, A. Claire, "Critical Reflections on the Westphalian Assumptions of International Law and Organization: A Crisis of Legitimacy", REV. INT’L STUD, 27, pp.133~ (2001)
- Cutler, A. Claire, "Global Capitalism and Liberal Myths: Dispute Settlement in Private International Trade Relations", MILLENNIUM: J. INT’L STUD, 24, pp.377~ (1995)
- Delaney, Joachim, "THE OXFORD HANDBOOK OF INTERNATIONAL INVESTMENT LAW", pp.721~ (2008), Oxford University Press
- Eden, Lorraine, "The Emerging North American Investment Regime", TRANSNAT'L CORPS, 5, pp.61~ (1996)
- Harrison, James, "Recent Developments to Promote Transparency and Public Participation in Investment Treaty Arbitration", L’OBSERVATEUR DES NATIONS UNIES, pp.119~ (2010)
- Jih-Un Kim, "The U.S. “Return to Asia” and China’s Perception, Attitude, and Foreign Policy", Oughtopia (오토피아), 28(1), pp.5~29 (2013), 인류사회재건연구원
- Rinken, Alfred, "DAS ÖFFENTLICHE HEUTE", pp.7~ (2002), NOMOS Verlgasgesellschft
- Schneiderman, David, "Investment Rules and the New Constitutionalism", LAW & SOC. INQUIRY, 25, pp.757~ (2000)
- Smend, Rudolf, "STAATSRECHTLICHE ABHANDLUNGHEN", pp.462~ (1994), Duncker & Humbolt
- Van Harten, Gus, "International Investment Law and Comparative Public Law", pp.627~654 (2010), Oxford University Press
- Van Harten, Gus, "Judicial Supervision of NAFTA Chapter 11 Arbitration: Public or Private Law?", ARBITRATION INTERNATIONAL, 21, pp.493~ (2005)
- Van Harten, Gus, "Investment Treaty Arbitration as a Species of Global Administrative Law", EUR. J. INT'L L, 17, pp.121~ (2006)
- Möllers, Christoph, "TRANSNATIONAL GOVERNANCE AND CONSTITUTIONALISM", pp.330~ (2004), Hart Publishing
- BRYSK, ALISON, "HUMAN RIGHTS AND PRIVATE WRONGS: CONSTRUCTING GLOBAL CIVIL SOCIETY" (2005), Routledge
- BUCKLAND, W. W., "A TEXT-BOOK OF ROMAN LAW FROM AUGUSTUS TO JUSTINIAN" (1963), Cambridge University Press
- BURNS, J. H., "LORDSHIP, KINGSHIP AND EMPIRE: THE IDEA OF MONARCHY", pp.1400~1525 (1992), Oxford University Press
- CALLIESS, GRALF-PETER, "ROUGH CONSENSUS AND RUNNING CODE: A THEORY OF TRANSNATIONAL PRIVATE LAW" (2010), HART
- CHO, HAN-SANG, "WHAT IS THE PUBLIC" (2006), CHAEKSESANG
- CHURCH, WILLIAM FARR, "CONSTITUTIONAL THOUGHT IN SIXTEENTH CENTURY FRANCE" (1941), Harvard University Press
- DEWEY, JOHN, "THE PUBLIC AND ITS PROBLEMS" (1954), Swallow Press
- FISHER III , WILLIAM W., "AMERICAN LEGAL REALISM" (1993), Oxford University Press
- HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, "FAKTIZITÄT UND GELTUNG: BEITRAGE ZUR DISKURSTHEORIE DES RECHTS UND DES DEMOKRATISCHEN RECHTSSTAATS" (1998), Suhrkamp
- HABERMAS, JÜRGEN, "THE STRUCTURAL TRANSFORMATION OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE: AN INQUIRY INTO A CATEGORY OF BOURGEOIS SOCIETY" (2007), Polity Press
- HALL, KERMIT L., "AMERICAN LEGAL HISTORY: CASE AND MATERIAL" (2005), Oxford University Press
- HORWITZ, MORTON J., "THE TRANSFORMATION OF AMERICAN LAW, 1780-1860" (1977), Harvard University Press
- KELLY, JHON MAURICE, "A SHORT HISTORY OF WESTERN LEGAL THEORY" (2006), Clarendon Press
- KENNEDY, DAVID, "THE CANON OF AMERICAN LEGAL THOUGHT" (2006), Princeton University Press
- KING, MICHAEL, "NIKLAS LUHMANN’S THEORY OF POLTICS AND LAW" (2003), Palgrave Macmillan
- LOUGHLIN, MARTIN, "THE IDEA OF PUBLIC LAW" (2003), Oxford University Press
- MARTENS, WOLFGANG, "ÖFFENTLICH ALS RECHTSBEGRIFF" (1969), Gehlen
- PETER HÄBERLE, "ÖFFENTLICHES INTERESSE ALS JURISTICHES PROBLEM: EINE ANALYSE VON GESETZGEBUNG UND RECHTSPRECHUNG" (2006), Berliner Wiss.-Verl
- McCLOSKEY, ROBERT G., "THE AMERICAN SUPREME COURT" (2005), The University of Chicago Press
- PAUL, ARNOLD, "CONSERVATIVE CRISIS AND THE RULE OF LAW" (1969), Harper
- REDFERN, ALAN, "LAW AND PRACTICE OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION" (1999), Sweet & Maxwell
- RINKEN, ALFRED, "DAS ÖFFENTLICHE ALS VERFASSUNGSTHE -ORETISCHES PROBLEM, DARGESTELLT AM RECHTSSTATUS DER WOHLFAHRTSVERBÄNDE, SCHRIFTEN ZUM ÖFFENTLICHEN RECHT" (1971), Duncker & Humblot
- SEN, AMARTYA KUMAR, "DEVELOPMENT AS FREEDOM" (1999), Oxford Press
- TUCK, RICHARD, "NATURAL RIGHTS THEORIES" (1979), Cambridge University Press
- VAN HARTEN, GUS, "INVESTMENT TREATY ARBITRATION AND PUBLIC LAW" (2007), Oxford University Press
- Todd Weiler, "NAFTA: INVESTMENTS LAW AND ARBITRATION: PAST ISSUES, CURRENT PRACTICE, FUTURE PROSPECTS" (2004), Transnational Publishers
- Finnegan, William, "The Economics of Empire-Notes on the Washington Consensus", HARPER’S, pp.41~ (2003)
- Klein, Naomi, "Disaster Capitalism — The New Economy of Catastrophe", HARPER’S, pp.47~ (2007)
- William Easterly, "The Cartel of Good Intentions", FOREIGN POLICY, 42, pp.40~ (2002)
- "Special Report Copenhagen Consensus: Putting the World to Rights", THE ECONOMIST, ~ (2004)
- "Charles River Bridge Company v. Warren Bride Company 36 U.S. 420", ~ (1837)
- "Lochner v. New York 198 U.S. 45", ~ (1905)
- "Munn v. Illinois 94 U.S. 113", ~ (1876)
- "Slaughterhouse Cases 83 U.S. 36", ~ (1873)
- "Metalclad v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)", 97, pp.2000, ~
- Daniel Lee, "Private Law Models for Public Law Concepts: The Juristic Theory of Civil Dominium in the Monarchomachs", PAPER PRESENTED AT THE ANNUAL MEETING OF THE MIDWEST POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION (2007)
- "Metalclad v. Mexico"[URL]
- Stephen A. White, "ROUTLEDGE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF PHILOSOPHY" (2003), Routledge
- IMPROVING THE SYSTEM OF INVESTOR -STATE DISPUTE SETTLEMENT, "K. YANNACA-SMALL", OECD, ~ (2006)