본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

성폭력범죄자의 신상공개제도에 관한 비판적 소고 -‘아동⋅청소년의 성보호에 관한 법률’을 중심으로-

A Study on the Order System of Disclosure of Sexual Offender’s Personal Information

1

조회

0

다운로드

10

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently, Sex offences against children have occurred in succession all over the country. Many people have raged extremely against the offences like that. Also, The government has tried to severely punish sex offenders against children, because it is its duty to do that. And thus, The act on the protection of children and juveniles from sexual offenders was legislated on February 3, 2000 and enforced from July 1, 2000. Besides the act, the government have enacted a variety of acts with regard to sexual offences. In addition to other measures, the act had the special articles of disclosure of Sexual Offender’s personal information. However, the Act, which was enacted as a special enforcement of Sex Crime Law, was not preceded with a scientific study on the current standing and cause of sexual offence and was not consulted any group of experts in the enactment of the act. For these reasons, the measure of disclosure of sexual offenders’ personal information has became an issue of dispute since its legislation. Controversial debate on that measure is still crucial topic among policy makers, scholars,and many people. Some people criticize that measure will double jeopardy and is unnecessarily invasive due to the side effect. But others argue that it is a necessary condition to reduce and manage the risk of repetition of sexual offences and the side effects can be controlled through supplements. This paper will have a careful look at the realities of sexual offences in Korea and check if the measure is in accordance with a few crucial principles of the constitution. And this paper will also evaluate whether such acts and measures for sexual offences are effective in practice and rightful from a standpoint of constitutionalism and the various principles of constitution.

Abstract

Recently, Sex offences against children have occurred in succession all over the country. Many people have raged extremely against the offences like that. Also, The government has tried to severely punish sex offenders against children, because it is its duty to do that. And thus, The act on the protection of children and juveniles from sexual offenders was legislated on February 3, 2000 and enforced from July 1, 2000. Besides the act, the government have enacted a variety of acts with regard to sexual offences. In addition to other measures, the act had the special articles of disclosure of Sexual Offender’s personal information. However, the Act, which was enacted as a special enforcement of Sex Crime Law, was not preceded with a scientific study on the current standing and cause of sexual offence and was not consulted any group of experts in the enactment of the act. For these reasons, the measure of disclosure of sexual offenders’ personal information has became an issue of dispute since its legislation. Controversial debate on that measure is still crucial topic among policy makers, scholars,and many people. Some people criticize that measure will double jeopardy and is unnecessarily invasive due to the side effect. But others argue that it is a necessary condition to reduce and manage the risk of repetition of sexual offences and the side effects can be controlled through supplements. This paper will have a careful look at the realities of sexual offences in Korea and check if the measure is in accordance with a few crucial principles of the constitution. And this paper will also evaluate whether such acts and measures for sexual offences are effective in practice and rightful from a standpoint of constitutionalism and the various principles of constitution.

참고문헌 (37)

  1. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2001), 법문사
  2. 권영성, "헌법학원론" (2007), 법문사
  3. 김성돈, "형법총론" (2008), 성균관대학교 출판부
  4. 박상기, "형사정책 제10판" (2006), 한국형사정책연구원
  5. 배종대, "형사정책 제6판" (2006), 홍문사
  6. 손동권, "형법총칙론" (2001), 율곡출판사
  7. 손동권, "형법총칙론 제2개정판" (2006), 율곡출판사
  8. 정영일, "형법총론" (2005), 박영사
  9. 이재상, "형법총론" (2003), 박영사
  10. 정성근, "형법총론" (2008), 삼지원
  11. 정종섭, "헌법학원론" (2010), 박영사
  12. 허영, "한국헌법론 전정7판" (2011), 박영사
  13. Cesare Beccaria, "범죄와 형벌" (1995), 길안사
  14. 권창국, "청소년 성매매행위등에 규제방법으로서 신상공개제도에 대한 검토", 형사정책연구, 12(2), pp.199~224 (2001), 한국형사정책연구원
  15. 김영환, "독일법철학과 형법의 전통", 한림법학, 1, pp.141~155 (1991), 한림대학교 법학연구소
  16. 김성돈, "책임형법의 위기와 예방형법의 한계", 형사법연구, 22(3), pp.3~31 (2010), 한국형사법학회
  17. 문재완, "성범죄자 신상공개제도 위헌성 재검토 - 미국의 메간법 판결과의 비교를 중심으로 -", 헌법학연구, 9(2), pp.343~369 (2003), 한국헌법학회
  18. 박기석, "청소년 성매수자에 대한 신상공개의 문제점", 矯正硏究, 20, pp.41~69 (2003), 한국교정학회
  19. 송진경, "위치추적 전자감시제도에 대한 비판적 검토", 형사법연구, 23(2), pp.311~340 (2011), 한국형사법학회
  20. 신준섭, "청소년 대상 성범죄자 신상공개제도의 효과성 분석:성범죄 일반예방효과를 중심으로", 한국아동복지학, (18), pp.35~61 (2004), 한국아동복지학회
  21. 저스티스, "신상공개의 정당화근거와 적절한 공개대상과 공개기준의 탐색", 저스티스, 통권 : 65, pp.24~38 (2002), 한국법학원
  22. 이경재, "청소년보호법의 문제점과 개선방안", 형사정책, 13(2), pp.31~54 (2001), 한국형사정책학회
  23. 이경재, "성범죄자 신상공개의 법적 문제점 고찰", 저스티스, 통권 : 65, pp.5~23 (2002), 한국법학원
  24. 이병희, "성범죄자 신상공개에 대한 형사법적 고찰", 형사법연구, (17), pp.259~278 (2002), 한국형사법학회
  25. 이종갑, "형벌이론과 행형", 인권복지연구, (2), pp.171~194 (2007), 한국인권사회복지학회
  26. 임상규, "성범죄자 신상공개의 필요성과 허구성", 형사법연구, (19), pp.372~392 (2003), 한국형사법학회
  27. 윤상민, "형사제재와 소급효금지의 원칙", 법학연구, (38), pp.199~221 (2010), 한국법학회
  28. 윤지영, "성범죄자 신상공개제도의 변천", 형사정책연구소식, (115), pp.4~7 (2010), 한국형사정책연구원
  29. 정현미, "성폭력범죄대책과 전자감시: 특정 범죄자에 대한 위치추적전자장치부착에 관한 법률”의 검토를 중심으로", 형사정책, 21(1), pp.321~349 (2009), 한국형사정책학회
  30. 최상욱, "청소년 성범죄자 신상공개에 관한 소고", 법학연구, 12(4), pp.193~214 (2002), 법학연구원
  31. 청소년보호위원회 선도보호과, "청소년대상 성범죄자 신상공개제도에 관한 연구", pp.1~136 (2001)
  32. "범죄분석 통권 제143호" (2010), 대검찰청
  33. "범죄분석 통권 제144호" (2011), 대검찰청
  34. "성범죄자 신상공개 대폭 확대법 발의"[URL]
  35. "범죄와 형사사법 통계정보"[URL]
  36. "범죄와 형사사법 통계정보"[URL]
  37. "현행 성범죄자 신상공개제도의 위헌성"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)