본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대동법의 성립에서 김육의 역할

Kim Yuk’ Role in The Legislation of Taedongpŏp

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

As Ching Young Choe said, this law was the conscious response of many reformists against the total national crisis, even though Taedongpŏp (known as the Uniform Land Tax Law) costed long time for its legislation. Among the response, the role of Kim Yuk was one of the most important things. This is proved by the fact that the contemporary and following figures attributed the legislation of Taedongpŏp to him. The study on the Kim Yuk comes near to the direct understanding how this law could be established breaking through so many political obstacles. This paper focused on the political role of Kim Yuk in establishing the Taedongpŏp. Kim Yuk was not the smartest theorist to totally design the Taedongpŏp. He was not the most expert official in enacting this law either. And he also was not the sarim(士林) who was full of the Confucian principles. His political role in the legislation of Taedongpŏp, however, was possible on the ground that he included the theoretical understanding on tributary system, working-level understanding on the legislation of Taedongpŏp, which was based on his long official experiences, the flexible diplomatic approaches on Ching China, and Confucian principle of sarim, which basically was maintained for his all life. These several elements were the his own conditions for his political role toward the reform. On the basis of these elements, he arranged the working-level official, who had been selected by him, to the important official posts for driving the reform. And then, he protected them against strong political draft. These elements also enabled him to win king’s absolute confidence. As he said, this confidence was the most important, and final element for the legislation of Taedongpŏp.

Abstract

As Ching Young Choe said, this law was the conscious response of many reformists against the total national crisis, even though Taedongpŏp (known as the Uniform Land Tax Law) costed long time for its legislation. Among the response, the role of Kim Yuk was one of the most important things. This is proved by the fact that the contemporary and following figures attributed the legislation of Taedongpŏp to him. The study on the Kim Yuk comes near to the direct understanding how this law could be established breaking through so many political obstacles. This paper focused on the political role of Kim Yuk in establishing the Taedongpŏp. Kim Yuk was not the smartest theorist to totally design the Taedongpŏp. He was not the most expert official in enacting this law either. And he also was not the sarim(士林) who was full of the Confucian principles. His political role in the legislation of Taedongpŏp, however, was possible on the ground that he included the theoretical understanding on tributary system, working-level understanding on the legislation of Taedongpŏp, which was based on his long official experiences, the flexible diplomatic approaches on Ching China, and Confucian principle of sarim, which basically was maintained for his all life. These several elements were the his own conditions for his political role toward the reform. On the basis of these elements, he arranged the working-level official, who had been selected by him, to the important official posts for driving the reform. And then, he protected them against strong political draft. These elements also enabled him to win king’s absolute confidence. As he said, this confidence was the most important, and final element for the legislation of Taedongpŏp.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "사회경제정책 논의의 정치적 성격. In 조선중기 정치와 정책" (2003), 아카넷
  2. "光海君日記", ~
  3. "備邊司謄錄", ~
  4. "西峯日記", 35~53
  5. "承政院日記", ~
  6. "愼獨齋全書", ~
  7. "仁祖實錄", ~
  8. "潛谷先生遺稿", ~
  9. "潛谷續稿", ~
  10. "潛谷續稿", 潛谷先生年譜, ~
  11. "孝宗實錄", ~
  12. 權乃鉉, "朝鮮後期 平安道 財政運營 硏究", 박사, 사학과, pp.2003
  13. 金世奉, "金堉의 社會經濟政策 硏究", 史學志, 21 (1987)
  14. 金世奉, "17世紀 湖西山林勢力 硏究-山人勢力을 중심으로", 박사, 사학과, pp.1995
  15. 김준석, "김육의 안민경제론과 대동법", 民族文化, 24 (2001)
  16. 배우성, "17세기 정책논의구조와 김육의 사회경제정책관", 民族文化, 24 (2001)
  17. 宋贊植, "朝鮮朝 士林政治의 權力構造-銓郞과 三司를 中心으로 in 朝鮮後期 社會經濟史의 硏究" (1997), 일조각
  18. 尹用出, "17세기 초의 結布制", 釜大史學, 19 (1995)
  19. 李景奭, "白軒集", pp.24~, 年譜 上
  20. 李京澯, "조선 효종조의 북벌운동", 淸溪史學, 5 (1988)
  21. 李楠福, "金堉의 思想과 그 歷史的 位置", 史學志, 14 (1980)
  22. 이정철, "조선시대 공물변통론에서 蒲渚趙翼의 위치와 역할", 대동문화연구, 70, pp.255~286 (2010), 대동문화연구원
  23. 이정철, "17세기 조선의 공납제 개혁논의와 대동법의 성립", 박사, pp.2004
  24. 이헌창, "김육의 경제사상과 경제 업적 in 잠곡 김육 연구" (2007), 태학사
  25. 鄭萬祚, "17세기 중반 漢黨의 정치활동과 國政運營論", 韓國文化, 23 (1999)
  26. 정홍준, "17세기 대신과 儒賢의 역학관계", 국사관논총, 65
  27. 趙翼, "浦渚集", ~
  28. 韓榮國, "湖南에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 15 (1961)
  29. 韓榮國, "湖南에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 20 (1963)
  30. 韓榮國, "湖南에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 21 (1963)
  31. 韓榮國, "湖南에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 24 (1964)
  32. 韓榮國, "湖西에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 13 (1960)
  33. 韓榮國, "湖西에 實施된 大同法", 歷史學報, 14 (1961)
  34. Ching Young Choe, "Kim Yuk(1580∼1658)” and the “Taedongbop Reform", The Journal of Asian Studies, 23(1) (1963)

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)