본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

국내 커버드본드(Covered Bond) 법률의 제정과 검토 과제

The Legislation and Policy Issues for Korea Covered Bond Act

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Recently, the Government introduced legislative draft for Korea Covered Bond Act of 2013 to the National Assembly on February 5, 2013. This aims at continuous financial stability that qualified bank can easily raise money through issuing covered bond even though financial crisis. In other words, this will enable credit to flow more readily from the capital markets to households, small business, and the Government in a way that enhances the stability of th broader financial system. In Korea, households debt is threatening financial stability. Especially, residential mortgage loan, which covers more than 50% of households debt, is severe and serious in terms of its sizable increase and structural risks. Short-term, variable, nonamortizing(straight) mortgages are representing 90% shares of all residential loans. This structure are very vulnerable to external variability. Therefore we should try to convert current mortgage structure into long-term,fixed-rate, amortizing structure. For extended loan structure, legislation of covered bond act is imperative. Korean banks and loan credit companies are mainly raising fund from short-term market. By raising long-term fund through covered bond, credit institutions are enable to serve long-term mortgage loan. There are several legislative and policy issues regarding this bill. The core elements of the legislative framework are legal certainty for covered bond programs and public supervision by financial authorities. The legal status of covered bond is established by specifying the catagories of eligible issuers and eligible cover-pool assets, mandating an asset coverage test for cover pools and audits by an independent asset monitor, and clarifying applicable securities. Most important, since covered bonds are distinguished from other pool forms of secured debt by a mechanism for managing (rather than liquidating) the cover pool upon the issuer’s default or insolvency and continuing scheduled (rather than accelerated) payments,the framework created a separate resolution process for covered bond programs. Here, covered bond is similar to secured bond, which current “the Secured Bond Trust Act” regulates and its mechanism is restricted to trust scheme. In order to steer an issuance of covered bond, legislative draft needs to be modified and added some clauses. To change mortgage loan maturity into longer term, eligible asset test needs to include DTI ratio and KDIC(Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation)’s control right to covered assets upon the issuer’s default or insolvency. Furthermore, mortgage debtor’right or protection should be taken into consideration.

Abstract

Recently, the Government introduced legislative draft for Korea Covered Bond Act of 2013 to the National Assembly on February 5, 2013. This aims at continuous financial stability that qualified bank can easily raise money through issuing covered bond even though financial crisis. In other words, this will enable credit to flow more readily from the capital markets to households, small business, and the Government in a way that enhances the stability of th broader financial system. In Korea, households debt is threatening financial stability. Especially, residential mortgage loan, which covers more than 50% of households debt, is severe and serious in terms of its sizable increase and structural risks. Short-term, variable, nonamortizing(straight) mortgages are representing 90% shares of all residential loans. This structure are very vulnerable to external variability. Therefore we should try to convert current mortgage structure into long-term,fixed-rate, amortizing structure. For extended loan structure, legislation of covered bond act is imperative. Korean banks and loan credit companies are mainly raising fund from short-term market. By raising long-term fund through covered bond, credit institutions are enable to serve long-term mortgage loan. There are several legislative and policy issues regarding this bill. The core elements of the legislative framework are legal certainty for covered bond programs and public supervision by financial authorities. The legal status of covered bond is established by specifying the catagories of eligible issuers and eligible cover-pool assets, mandating an asset coverage test for cover pools and audits by an independent asset monitor, and clarifying applicable securities. Most important, since covered bonds are distinguished from other pool forms of secured debt by a mechanism for managing (rather than liquidating) the cover pool upon the issuer’s default or insolvency and continuing scheduled (rather than accelerated) payments,the framework created a separate resolution process for covered bond programs. Here, covered bond is similar to secured bond, which current “the Secured Bond Trust Act” regulates and its mechanism is restricted to trust scheme. In order to steer an issuance of covered bond, legislative draft needs to be modified and added some clauses. To change mortgage loan maturity into longer term, eligible asset test needs to include DTI ratio and KDIC(Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation)’s control right to covered assets upon the issuer’s default or insolvency. Furthermore, mortgage debtor’right or protection should be taken into consideration.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. 주택저당대출자산 유동화 시스템 개선 방안, "유윤주", 증권연구원, ~ (2005)
  2. 최배근, "시장시스템들의 붕괴와 대변환" (2012), 집문당
  3. Beck Melissa D, "United States: Bright Outlook For Covered Bonds", Morrison & Foerster LLP, ~ (2012)
  4. Rick Jones, "As Covered Bond Markets Retreat", Dechert LLP, ~ (2012)
  5. 김영도, "커버드본드의 개요 및 제도 개선 방향", The Banker, 통권 : 685, pp.16~23 (2011), 전국은행연합회
  6. 김필규, "미국의 커버드본드 제도 도입의 주요 내용과 시사점", 자본시장 Weekly, (14), pp.1~4 (2012), 한국자본시장연구원
  7. 김호균, "커버드본드의 현황과 도입 전략: 독일 판트브리프를 중심으로", 경상논총, 29(1), pp.1~23 (2011), 한독경상학회
  8. 남재현, "커버드본드 도입방안, 가계부채 안정화방안", 하나금융경영연구소, 2012. 6. 21, 87~109 (2012)
  9. 문영배, "가계부채 안정화와 커버드본드 법제화의 필요성", 하나금융포커스, 2(13), pp.6~9 (2012), 하나금융경영연구소
  10. 박종관, "은행의 커버드본드 발행 현황과 제도화에 대한 검토", The Banker, 통권 : 685, pp.24~31 (2011), 전국은행연합회
  11. 서정호, "커버드본드 발행 관련 법률 제정의 의의", 커버드본드 발행관련 공청회, pp.1~15 (2012), 한국금융연구원
  12. 신일용, "한국주택금융공사의 해외 커버드본드 발행과 시사점", 주택금융월보, 통권 : 72, pp.21~31 (2010), 한국주택금융공사
  13. 양기진, "커버드본드(Covered Bond)에 관한 법적 연구 : 국민은행 커버드본드의 발행구조 분석 및 관련 법제정비를 위주로", 금융법연구, 7(1)통권 : 13, pp.171~204 (2010), 한국금융법학회
  14. 양오석, "유럽중앙은행의 커버드본드(CB) 매입 결정의 배경과 효과", 거시경제 EU Economy, pp.5~7 (2009), Yonsei-SERI EU Centre
  15. 이미현, "담보부사채발행의 활성화", BFL, (31), pp.68~82 (2008), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  16. 전광섭, "해외 Covered Bond 발행구조와 시사점", 주택금융월보, 통권 : 73, pp.2~21 (2010), 한국주택금융공사
  17. 정재호, "커버드본드(Covered Bond) 관련 동향 및 시사점", 조사연구, (31), pp.131~147 (2010), 금융감독원
  18. 홍봉주, "부동산 공시방법의 역사에 관한 비교법적 고찰", 일감법학, (17), pp.235~262 (2010), 법학연구소
  19. 금융위원회 금융감독원, "은행의 커버드본드 발행을 위한 모범규준제정", 보도참고자료, ~ (2011)
  20. 김정식, "가계부채 연착륙 방안", 한국경제학회 금융대토론회 (2013)
  21. 김호균, "커버드본드 제도 도입을 위한 과제", MBS 시장 활성화를위한 과제, 세미나 발표자료 (2010), 한국증권학회
  22. 문영배, "커버드본드 제도 도입을 통한 부동산금융 및 금융시장 선진화 방안", 세미나자료 (2012), NICE신용평가정보
  23. 예금보험공사, "美 커버드본드법 제정안에 대한 FDIC의 의견 주요내용", 국회입법조사처, ~ (2013)
  24. 이중상환청구권부채권 발행에 관한 법률안, "정무위원회", ~ (2013)
  25. 정순섭, "커버드본드 입법 관련 법적 이슈", 세미나 발표자료 (2012), 한국금융연구원
  26. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, "Covered Bond Policy Statement" (2008), press release
  27. Garrett Maloney, "United States Covered Bond Act of 2011, summary and section-by section analysis", ~ (2011)
  28. S&P, "Kookmin Bank", RatingsDirect, ~ (2009)
  29. "Verband Deutscher Pfandbriefbanken", ~ (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)