A Study of Theoretical Justifications for Mandatory ESG Disclosure in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The growing global focus on sustainable development and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors necessitates robust disclosure legislation, including in South Korea, where corporate conglomerates, or chaebols, dominate the economy. This research underscores the critical need for comprehensive ESG disclosure laws, supported by Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability Theory, and Legitimacy Theory, within the Korean context. Stakeholder Theory emphasizes the accountability of chaebols to diverse groups beyond shareholders, advocating for transparent ESG practices that align with societal expectations. Sustainability Theory highlights the importance of aligning corporate actions with long-term national sustainability goals, such as Korea's Green New Deal, to enhance environmental and social resilience. Legitimacy Theory supports the notion that transparent ESG disclosures build local and global legitimacy, fostering trust and compliance with evolving standards. This study explores the intersection of these theories, demonstrating how mandatory ESG disclosures can enhance corporate governance, support sustainable business practices, and improve market competitiveness. By legislating comprehensive ESG disclosure requirements, Korea can ensure long-term value creation, stakeholder engagement, and alignment with global sustainability trends. This research provides a theoretical foundation for policy-makers, suggesting that robust ESG disclosure laws are essential for promoting transparency, accountability, and sustainable economic growth in Korea.
Abstract
The growing global focus on sustainable development and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors necessitates robust disclosure legislation, including in South Korea, where corporate conglomerates, or chaebols, dominate the economy. This research underscores the critical need for comprehensive ESG disclosure laws, supported by Stakeholder Theory, Sustainability Theory, and Legitimacy Theory, within the Korean context. Stakeholder Theory emphasizes the accountability of chaebols to diverse groups beyond shareholders, advocating for transparent ESG practices that align with societal expectations. Sustainability Theory highlights the importance of aligning corporate actions with long-term national sustainability goals, such as Korea's Green New Deal, to enhance environmental and social resilience. Legitimacy Theory supports the notion that transparent ESG disclosures build local and global legitimacy, fostering trust and compliance with evolving standards. This study explores the intersection of these theories, demonstrating how mandatory ESG disclosures can enhance corporate governance, support sustainable business practices, and improve market competitiveness. By legislating comprehensive ESG disclosure requirements, Korea can ensure long-term value creation, stakeholder engagement, and alignment with global sustainability trends. This research provides a theoretical foundation for policy-makers, suggesting that robust ESG disclosure laws are essential for promoting transparency, accountability, and sustainable economic growth in Korea.
참고문헌 (80)
- "17 CFR 229.101, 103, 303, 401, 407, 1500, 1502(b), (c), (d), (f), 1505", ~
- "17 CFR 240.2a-19, 12b-2", ~
- Aghion, P., "Chaebols and firm dynamics in Korea", Economic Policy, 36(108), pp.598~ (2021)
- Alon, A., "Sustainability Performance and Assurance : Influence on Reputation", Corporate Reputation Review, 18(4), pp.337~352 (2015)
- Amel-Zadeh, A., "Why and How Investors Use ESG Information : Evidence from a Global Survey", Financial Analysts Journal, 74(3), pp.87~103 (2018)
- Atif, M., "Environmental, social and governance disclosure and default risk", Business Strategy and the Environment, 30(8), pp.3937~3959 (2021)
- Baek, J. S., "Business groups and tunneling : Evidence from private securities offerings by Korean chaebols", The Journal of Finance, 61(5), pp.2415~2449 (2006)
- Baker, S., "The politics of sustainable development: theory, policy and practice within the European Union", pp.22~27 (1997), Taylor & Francis
- Baldini, M., "Role of Countryand Firm-Level Determinants in Environmental, Social, and Governance Disclosure", Journal of Business Ethics, 150, pp.79~98 (2018)
- "California Transparency in Supply Chains Act", Cal. Civ. Code § 1714.43, ~ (2010)
- "Chaebol"[URL]
- Carla Del Gesso, "Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies", Journal of Accounting Literature (2024)
- Chen, Z., "ESG disclosure and financial performance : Moderating role of ESG investors", International Review of Financial Analysis, 83, pp.102291~ (2022)
- Chiu, I. H. Y., "The EU Sustainable Finance Agenda : Developing Governance for Double Materiality in Sustainability Metrics", European Business Organization Law Review, 23, pp.87~123 (2022)
- Demuijnck, G., "The Social License to Operate", Journal of Business Ethics, 136(4), pp.675~685 (2016)
- "Directive 2014", 95, ~
- "Directive 2022", 2464. (2022), OJ L322, 15-80, point (9),(49), Article 29b.2.(b), 40(a).1
- "Enforcement Decree of the Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act. (2017). § 360", ~
- Esty, D. C., "Values at Work: Sustainable Investing and ESG Reporting", pp.13~33 (2020), Palgrave Macmillan Cham
- "Commission adopts European Sustainability Reporting Standards" (2023)[URL]
- Fairfax, L. M., "Dynamic Disclosure : An Expose on the Mythical Divide between Voluntary and Mandatory ESG Disclosure", Texas Law Review, 101, pp.283~285 (2022)
- Fifka, M., "Corporate responsibility reporting and its determinants in comparative perspective—A review of the empirical literature and a meta-analysis", Business Strategy and the Environment, 22(1), pp.1~35 (2013)
- "Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act", ~ (2017)
- Freeman, R. E., "Strategic management: A stakeholder approach", pp.24~25 (1984), Pitman
- Freeman, R. E., "Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art", pp.50~58 (2010), Cambridge University Press
- Freudenreich, B., "A stakeholder theory perspective on business models : Value creation for sustainability", Journal of business ethics, 166(1), pp.3~18 (2020)
- Haggard S., "Economic Crisis and Corporate Restructuring in Korea: Reforming the Chaebol", pp.25~ (2003), Cambridge University Press
- Hazen, T. L., "Social Issues in the Spotlight : The Increasing Need to Improve Publicly-Held Companies' CSR and ESG Disclosures", University of Pennsylvania Journal of Business Law, 23(3), pp.740~796 (2021)
- Ho, V. H., "Modernizing ESG Disclosure", University of Illinois Law Review, 2022(1), pp.277~356 (2022)
- Ho, V. H., "ESG Disclosure in Comparative Perspective : Optimizing Private Ordering in Public Reporting", University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Law, 41, pp.249~276 (2019)
- "IFRS Foundation announces ISSB consolidation with CDSB VRF publication of prototypes" (2021)[URL]
- "IOSCO Sees an Urgent Need for Globally Consistent, Comparable, and Reliable Sustainability Disclosure Standards and Announces Its Priorities and Vision for a Sustainability Standards Board under the IFRS Foundation" (2021)[URL]
- Johnson, L. P. Q., "New Approaches to Corporate Law", Washington and Lee Law Review, 50, pp.1713~1714 (1993)
- "Expected Amendment to the Environmental Information Disclosure System in Korea" (2023)[URL]
- "Survey of Sustainability Reporting 2022" (2022)[URL]
- "KRX ESG정보공개 가이던스(국문영문)" (2021)[URL]
- "기업지배구조보고서 가이드라인('24.1개정)" (2024)[URL]
- "ESG보고서 조회"[URL]
- "정보데이터시스템"[URL]
- Lear, L. J., "Rachel Carson's Silent Spring", Environmental history review, 17(2), pp.25~28 (1993)
- Lee, J. -H., "Green New Deal Policy of South Korea : Policy Innovation for a Sustainability Transition", Sustainability, 12(1), pp.1~17 (2020)
- "FSC decides to postpone ESG reporting requirement until 2026" (2023)[URL]
- "FSC decides to delay mandatory ESG reporting requirements" (2023)[URL]
- How Do Consumers Use Firm Disclosure? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment, "Leonelli, Sinja", University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics, 10~12, pp.University of Chicago, Becker Friedman Institute for Economics Working Paper No. 2024-04 (2024)
- Li, T. -T., "ESG : Research Progress and Future Prospects", Sustainability, 13(21), pp.1~28 (2021)
- Luo, L., "The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation : International evidence", Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), pp.2985~3000 (2023)
- McCormick, J., "The origins of the world conservation strategy", Environmental Review, 10(3), pp.177~187 (1986)
- Meadows, D. H., "Green planet blues", pp.25~29 (2018), Routledge
- Minetti, R., "Institutions, bailout policies, and bank loan contracting : evidence from Korean chaebols’, Review of Finance", European Finance Association, 19, pp.2223~2275 (2015)
- "Government Announces Overview of Korean New Deal" (2020)[URL]
- Peter, C., "Linking complexity and sustainability theories : Implications for modeling sustainability transitions", Sustainability, 6(3), pp.1594~1622 (2014)
- "Regulation Database"[URL]
- Qureshi, M. A., "The impact of sustainability (environmental, social, and governance) disclosure and board diversity on firm value: The moderating role of industry sensitivity", Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), pp.1199~1214 (2020)
- Rabaya, A. J., "The moderating effect of IR framework adoption on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance(ESG)disclosure and a firm's competitive advantage. Environment", Development and Sustainability : A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 24(2), pp.2037~2039 (2022)
- Rabaya, A. J., "The moderating effect of IR framework adoption on the relationship between environmental, social, and governance(ESG)disclosure and a firm's competitive advantage. Environment", Development and Sustainability : A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, 24(2), pp.2037~2039 (2022)
- Raimo, N., "Extending the benefits of ESG disclosure : The effect on the cost of debt financing", Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(4), pp.1412~1421 (2021)
- "Regulation 2019", 2088. (2019), OJ L 317, 1-44, point (7),(9), Article 3, 4, 5, and 6
- "Regulation 2020", 852, (2020), OJ L 198, 13-34, point (16), (19)
- "Regulation 2023", 2772, (2023). OJ L, 2023, ~
- Rim H, "A cross national comparison of transparency signaling in corporate social responsibility reporting: The United States, South Korea, and China cases", Corporate Social Responsibilities and Environmental Management, 26, pp.1517~1529 (2019)
- SEC., "Release No. 33-5170. Federal Register, 36(13989)", ~ (1971)
- SEC., "Interpretive Release No. 33-6130. Federal Register, 44(56924)", ~ (1979)
- SEC., "Release No. 33-6315. Federal Register, 46(25638)", ~ (1981)
- SEC., "Release No. 33-6383. Federal Register, 47(11380)", ~ (1982)
- "SEC Adopts Rules to Enhance Disclosures by Public Companies Regarding Climate Change and Cybersecurity Risks" (2024)[URL]
- Innovative Korea: Leveraging Innovation and Technology for Development, "Soh, H. S.", World Bank, 61~ (2023)
- Suchman, M. C., "Managing legitimacy : Strategic and institutional approaches", Academy of Management Review, 20(3), pp.571~574 (1995)
- Palazzo, G., "Corporate legitimacy as deliberation : A communicative framework", Journal of Business Ethics, 66(1), pp.71~88 (2006)
- Szabó, D., "New EU directive on the disclosure of non-financial information (CSR)", European Company and Financial Law Review, 12(3), pp.312~ (2015)
- "About"[URL]
- "Transparency in Agricultural Supply Chains Act", Wash. S.B. 5693, ~ (2019)
- Zaid, M. A. A., "A roadmap for triggering the convergence of global ESG disclosure standards : lessons from the IFRS foundation and stakeholder engagement", Corporate Governance, 23(7), pp.1648~1669 (2023)
- 김희준, "일감몰아주기 관행에 대한 회사기회유용금지법리의 적용여부 검토", 법과정책, 20(1) (2014), 제주대학교 법과정책연구원
- "ESG공시법안 난립…기업은 고달프다" (2021)[URL]
- "선제적 ESG 공시 의무화 도입 반대" (2021)[URL]
- "정보보호 산업의 진흥에 관한 법률", Act on the Promotion of Information Security Industry. (Act No. 15374). §13.1, ~ (2018)
- 펑자오신, "중국의 ESG 정보공시 제도에 관한 연구", 박사, 국제법무학과
- "ESG 의무 공시로 혼란 우려…충분한 준비기간 주어져야" (2024)[URL]
- "환경기술 및 산업지원에 관한 법률", Environmental Technology and Industry Support Act.(Act No. 17183).§16.8, 16.9 and 37, ~ (2020)
- 黄世忠, "支撑ESG的三大理论支柱", 财会月刊, (19), pp.3~10 (2021)
