Comparison of changes in the buccal keratinized mucosa between the minimally-invasive crestal incision and apically-positioned full-thickness flap methods for stage-two implant surgery
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Stage-two implant surgery, which exposes the implant platform to connect the healing abutment, affects the width of the peri-implant keratinized mucosa thereby affecting the long-term prognosis of the implant. The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in the width of the peri-implant buccal keratinized mucosa between the minimally-invasive crestal incision (MCI) procedure and the apically-positioned full-thickness flap (APFTF) method during stage-two implant surgery. A total of 74 implants were placed in 41 patients. The MCI group included 27 implant cases wherein, healing abutments were connected after stage-two implant surgery using the MCI in 18 patients. The APFTF group comprised 47 implant cases wherein, healing abutments were connected after stage-two implant surgery using the APFTF method in 23 patients. The buccal keratinized mucosa widths (BKMW) of the healing abutment and prosthesis were measured at the mesial, central, and distal aspects after the stage-two surgery and the final restoration. A decrease in the BKMW in both groups after stage-two implant surgery was observed when compared with those after the final restoration; furthermore, the BKMW was significantly lower after stage-two implant surgery in the MCI group ( p <0.001). No statistically significant difference in BKMW was noted between the MCI and APFTF groups at any point. These results reveal that the APFTF method was more effective than MCI in terms of preserving the buccal peri-implant keratinized mucosa during stage-two implant surgery.
Abstract
Stage-two implant surgery, which exposes the implant platform to connect the healing abutment, affects the width of the peri-implant keratinized mucosa thereby affecting the long-term prognosis of the implant. The purpose of this study was to compare the changes in the width of the peri-implant buccal keratinized mucosa between the minimally-invasive crestal incision (MCI) procedure and the apically-positioned full-thickness flap (APFTF) method during stage-two implant surgery. A total of 74 implants were placed in 41 patients. The MCI group included 27 implant cases wherein, healing abutments were connected after stage-two implant surgery using the MCI in 18 patients. The APFTF group comprised 47 implant cases wherein, healing abutments were connected after stage-two implant surgery using the APFTF method in 23 patients. The buccal keratinized mucosa widths (BKMW) of the healing abutment and prosthesis were measured at the mesial, central, and distal aspects after the stage-two surgery and the final restoration. A decrease in the BKMW in both groups after stage-two implant surgery was observed when compared with those after the final restoration; furthermore, the BKMW was significantly lower after stage-two implant surgery in the MCI group ( p <0.001). No statistically significant difference in BKMW was noted between the MCI and APFTF groups at any point. These results reveal that the APFTF method was more effective than MCI in terms of preserving the buccal peri-implant keratinized mucosa during stage-two implant surgery.
참고문헌 (17)
- Schropp L, "Bone healing and soft tissue contour changes following single-tooth extraction : a clinical and radiographic 12-month prospective study", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 23, pp.313~323 (2003)[DOI]
- Landsberg CJ, "Socket seal surgery combined with immediate implant placement : a novel approach for singletooth replacement", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 17, pp.140~149 (1997)[DOI]
- Belser UC, "Aesthetic implant restorations in partially edentulous patients--a critical appraisal", Periodontol 2000, 17, pp.132~150 (1998)[DOI]
- Tunkel J, "Changes in soft tissue dimensions following three different techniques of stage-two surgery : a case series report", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 33, pp.411~418 (2013)[DOI]
- Nemcovsky CE, "A surgical approach to increase keratinized tissue width in maxillary implant uncovering : technique and clinical evaluation", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 22, pp.607~612 (2002)[DOI]
- Barone R, "A protocol for maintaining or increasing the width of masticatory mucosa around submerged implants : a 1-year prospective study on 53 patients", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 18, pp.377~387 (1998)[DOI]
- Hertel RC, "Stage 2 surgical techniques in endosseous implantation", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 9, pp.273~278 (1994)
- Berglundh T, "The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth", Clin Oral Implants Res, 2, pp.81~90 (1991)[DOI]
- Bernhart T, "A minimally invasive second-stage procedure for single-tooth implants", J Prosthet Dent, 79, pp.217~219 (1998)[DOI]
- Happe A, "The keyhole access expansion technique for flapless implant stage-two surgery : technical note", Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent, 30, pp.97~101 (2010)[DOI]
- Adell R, "A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw", Int J Oral Surg, 10, pp.387~416 (1981)[DOI]
- Albrektsson T, "The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants : a review and proposed criteria of success", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 1, pp.11~25 (1986)
- Martin W, "Local risk factors for implant therapy", Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, 24(Suppl), pp.28~38 (2009)
- Roos-Jansåker AM, "Nine- to fourteen-year follow-up of implant treatment. Part III: factors associated with peri-implant lesions", J Clin Periodontol, 33, pp.296~301 (2006)[DOI]
- Schrott AR, "Five-year evaluation of the influence of keratinized mucosa on peri-implant soft-tissue health and stability around implants supporting full-arch mandibular fixed prostheses", Clin Oral Implants Res, 20, pp.1170~1177 (2009)[DOI]
- Crespi R, "A 4-year evaluation of the peri-implant parameters of immediately loaded implants placed in fresh extraction sockets", J Periodontol, 81, pp.1629~1634 (2010)[DOI]
- Chung DM, "Significance of keratinized mucosa in maintenance of dental implants with different surfaces", J Periodontol, 77, pp.1410~1420 (2006)[DOI]