Thermoluminescent dosimetry of panoramic radiography
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aims to calibrate a thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) using a diagnostic radiation device and evaluate the dose of panoramic radiography. TLD-100s were calibrated using a solid-state dosimeter (Unfors Mult-O-Meter 512L; Unfors Instruments, Billdal, Sweden) and a diagnostic radiation device (HDT-500R; Hyun Dai Medical X-ray Co., Paju, Korea). Forty eight TLDs were placed in 24 sites of a head and neck phantom of a male (ART-210; Radiology Support Devices Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA), and panoramic radiation was performed under exposure parameters of 70 kVp and 10 mA using a ProMax (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). Using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 2007 recommendation, the effective dose of panoramic radiography was calculated from the absorbed doses of the tissues of the 24 TLD sites in a head and neck phantom. The absorbed dose of the TLD site was higher in the parotid gland (right: 1854.4 µGy, left: 1788.9 µGy) and lower in the calvarium anterior (3.8 µGy). The effective dose was calculated at 28.4 µSv. The cancer and heritable risks were 1.56×10–6 and 5.67×10–8, respectively. The TLD was calibrated using a diagnostic radiographic device, and the panoramic radiographic dose was evaluated. The findings of this study could be helpful in future dose studies.
Abstract
This study aims to calibrate a thermoluminescence dosimeter (TLD) using a diagnostic radiation device and evaluate the dose of panoramic radiography. TLD-100s were calibrated using a solid-state dosimeter (Unfors Mult-O-Meter 512L; Unfors Instruments, Billdal, Sweden) and a diagnostic radiation device (HDT-500R; Hyun Dai Medical X-ray Co., Paju, Korea). Forty eight TLDs were placed in 24 sites of a head and neck phantom of a male (ART-210; Radiology Support Devices Inc., Long Beach, CA, USA), and panoramic radiation was performed under exposure parameters of 70 kVp and 10 mA using a ProMax (Planmeca, Helsinki, Finland). Using the International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) 2007 recommendation, the effective dose of panoramic radiography was calculated from the absorbed doses of the tissues of the 24 TLD sites in a head and neck phantom. The absorbed dose of the TLD site was higher in the parotid gland (right: 1854.4 µGy, left: 1788.9 µGy) and lower in the calvarium anterior (3.8 µGy). The effective dose was calculated at 28.4 µSv. The cancer and heritable risks were 1.56×10–6 and 5.67×10–8, respectively. The TLD was calibrated using a diagnostic radiographic device, and the panoramic radiographic dose was evaluated. The findings of this study could be helpful in future dose studies.
참고문헌 (21)
- Korean Council of professors of oral and maxillofacial radiology, "Oral and maxillofacial radiology" (2015), Narae publishing Inc
- Mallya SM, "White and Pharoah's oral radiology:principles and interpretation" (2019), Elsevier
- International Commission on Radiological Protection, "1990recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection", Ann ICRP, 21, pp.1~201 (1991)
- M. W. Charles, "ICRP Publication 103: Recommendations of the ICRP", Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 129(4), pp.500~507 (2008), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- JB Ludlow, "Dosimetry of 3 CBCT devices for oral and maxillofacial radiology: CB Mercuray, NewTom 3G and i-CAT", Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 35(4), pp.219~226 (2006), British Institute of Radiology[DOI]
- John B. Ludlow, "Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology", Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology, and Endodontology, 106(1), pp.106~114 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 김은경, "Estimation of the effective dose of dental cone-beam computed tomography using personal computer-based Monte Carlo software", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 48(1), pp.21~30 (2018), 대한영상치의학회
- 이근선, "Effective dose from direct and indirect digital panoramic units", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 43(2), pp.77~84 (2013), 대한영상치의학회
- Gang Li, "Patient radiation dose and protection from cone-beam computed tomography", Imaging Science in Dentistry, 43(2), pp.63~69 (2013), 대한영상치의학회
- A Endo, "Characterization of optically stimulated luminescence dosemeters to measure organ doses in diagnostic radiology", Dentomaxillofacial Radiology, 41(3), pp.211~216 (2012), British Institute of Radiology[DOI]
- Samuel L. Brady, "CHARACTERIZATION OF A 137Cs IRRADIATOR FROM A NEW PERSPECTIVE WITH MODERN DOSIMETRIC TOOLS", Health Physics, 97(3), pp.195~205 (2009), Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)[DOI]
- Ghazale Geraily, "Comparison of thermoluminescent dosimeter calibration irradiated in gamma knife and60Co instruments", Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics, 15(Suppl), pp.S123~S126 (2019), Medknow[DOI]
- Singh R, "A comparative study for surface dose evaluation in conventional treatment of carcinoma breast patients irradiated with Co-60 and 6 MV radiation beam", J Cancer Res Ther, 15, pp.1035~1041 (2019)[DOI]
- Physical aspects of irradiation: recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements (ICRU), "International Commission on Radiological Units and Measurements", US Government Printing Office, ~, pp.Report 10b 1962 (1964)
- D.M. Moor, "Performance of the Harshaw DXT-RAD (TLD-100) dosemeter", Radiation Measurements, 43(2-6), pp.533~537 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Annette Haworth, "Comparison of TLD calibration methods for 192Ir dosimetry", Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics, 14(1), pp.258~272 (2013), Wiley[DOI]
- Sadeghi M, "Investigation of LiF, Mg and Ti(TLD-100)reproducibility", J Biomed Phys Eng, 5, pp.217~222 (2015)
- J. D. Rijken, "Calculation of the TLD700:LiF energy response from Ir-192 using novel Monte Carlo and empirical methods", Australasian Physical & Engineering Sciences in Medicine, 38(1), pp.129~138 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Senarath-Yapa K, "Management of burns in the community", Wounds UK, 5, pp.38~48 (2009)
- P M Som, "Lymph nodes of the neck", Radiology, 165(3), pp.593~600 (1987), Radiological Society of North America (RSNA)[DOI]
- John B. Ludlow, "Patient Risk Related to Common Dental Radiographic Examinations", The Journal of the American Dental Association, 139(9), pp.1237~1243 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]