Bonbu and Bangmyeon: The Lineage Principle in Daesoon Jinrihoe
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Park Wudang formally registered Daesoon Jinrihoe in 1969. While it shares ideas and history with other Jeungsanist groups, this paper argues that its organizational profile is unique. The two major institutional structures, the bonbu (headquarters) and the bangmyeon (branch) have together created space for the rapid development of this Korean new religion. The bonbu is a centralized hierarchy, while the bangmyeon exhibits the strong loyalty and cohesiveness of the clan. Running throughout both structural forms is the lineage concept, which is conceived here as an articulating paradigm able to operate in different organizational forms. This finely-balanced institutional structure makes a major contribution to Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ability to fulfill its religious mission. The first side of this balance is the headquarters, which includes the core organization based in Yeoju as well as some outside temples and training centers. All of these were established under the direction of the Lord of Principle, the Dojeon, Park Wudang. Park Wudang also fixed the Dao Constitution, the Doheon, which serves as a blueprint for governance. From the Central Council to the various institutions for propagation, guidance, and auditing, current management practices conform closely to Park Wudang’s organization vision. The second aspect of Daesoon Jinrihoe’s organization is the branch structure. The larger branches, such as Yeongwol and Geumreung, are complex organizations in their own rights. The paper concludes by characterizing the two major axes of headquarters and branch as organizational types. Using Robert Quinn and Kim Cameron’s institutional typology, the paper concludes that the bonbu is a classic centralized hierarchy with its focus on efficiency. The bangmyeon, in contrast, with its high level of group identity and spirit, comes approximates the clan institutional structure.
Abstract
Park Wudang formally registered Daesoon Jinrihoe in 1969. While it shares ideas and history with other Jeungsanist groups, this paper argues that its organizational profile is unique. The two major institutional structures, the bonbu (headquarters) and the bangmyeon (branch) have together created space for the rapid development of this Korean new religion. The bonbu is a centralized hierarchy, while the bangmyeon exhibits the strong loyalty and cohesiveness of the clan. Running throughout both structural forms is the lineage concept, which is conceived here as an articulating paradigm able to operate in different organizational forms. This finely-balanced institutional structure makes a major contribution to Daesoon Jinrihoe’s ability to fulfill its religious mission. The first side of this balance is the headquarters, which includes the core organization based in Yeoju as well as some outside temples and training centers. All of these were established under the direction of the Lord of Principle, the Dojeon, Park Wudang. Park Wudang also fixed the Dao Constitution, the Doheon, which serves as a blueprint for governance. From the Central Council to the various institutions for propagation, guidance, and auditing, current management practices conform closely to Park Wudang’s organization vision. The second aspect of Daesoon Jinrihoe’s organization is the branch structure. The larger branches, such as Yeongwol and Geumreung, are complex organizations in their own rights. The paper concludes by characterizing the two major axes of headquarters and branch as organizational types. Using Robert Quinn and Kim Cameron’s institutional typology, the paper concludes that the bonbu is a classic centralized hierarchy with its focus on efficiency. The bangmyeon, in contrast, with its high level of group identity and spirit, comes approximates the clan institutional structure.
참고문헌 (45)
- "Affiliated Organizations"[URL]
- "Dao Constitution"[URL]
- "Yeoju Headquarters Complex"[URL]
- Althusser, Louis, "On The Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses" (2014), Verso
- Baker, Don, "The Daesoon Academy of Sciences" (2016), Daesoon Jinrihoe Press
- Barbalet, Jack, "Routledge Handbook of Religions in Asia" (2015), Routledge
- Barnard, Chester I., "The Functions of the Executive" (1968), Harvard university Press
- Barnard, Chester I., "The Functions of the Executive" (1968), Harvard university Press
- "Varieties Of Korean Lineage Structure" (1973)[URL]
- "Current Anthropology", 1996, 429~450, pp.University of Chicago Press, 10.1086[DOI]
- Coase, R.H., "The Nature of the Firm", Economica, 4 (1937)[DOI]
- "Corporate Titles" (2017)[URL]
- Durkheim, Emile, "The Division of Labor in Society" (1933), Free Press
- Evans-Pritchard, E.E., "The Nuer: A Description of the Modes of Livelihood and Political Institutions of a Nilotic People" (1940), Clarendon
- Fortes, Meyer, "The Dynamics of Clanship among the Tallensi" (1945), Oxford University Press
- Freedman, Maurice, "Lineage Organization in Southeastern China, Chinese Lineage and Society: Fukien and Kwangtong" (1958), Athlone Press
- Graham, Edward M., "Reforming Korea’s Industrial Conglomerates" (2003), Columbia University Press
- Ha, Yong Chool, "Colonial Rule and social Change in Korea: 1910-1945" (2013), University of Washington Press
- Han’guk minjok chonggyo kyoûi hoe, "Han’guk minjok chonggyo ch’ongnam" (1992), Hanuri
- Hoare, James, "Korea: an introduction" (1988), Routledge
- Jorgensen, John, "Millenarianism, apocalypse and creation in contemporary Korean new religions", Linking Korea and Australasia for the new century, Proceedings of 1st Korean Studies Association of Australasia Conference (1999)
- Jorgensen, John, "Taesunchillihoe: factors in the rapid rise of a Korean new religion", Korean Studies at the Dawn of the Millennium, Proceedings of The Second Biennial Conference Korean Studies Association of Australasia
- Kang, Myung Hun, "The Korean Business Conglomerate: Chaebol Thenand Now" (1996), Institute of East Asian Studies
- Jessica E. Koski, "Understanding social hierarchies: The neural and psychological foundations of status perception", Social Neuroscience, 10(5), pp.527~550 (2015), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- "Why Hierarchies Thrive. Harvard Business Review, March 2003" (2003)[URL]
- Lee, Charles, "South Korean students find an old set of beliefs", Far Eastern Economic Review (1988)
- "Cultural critique, ideology, and articulation theory: Roland Barthes, Lacan/Althusser, and Stuart Hall; Angela McRobbie on disarticulation, Lecture 4" (2009)[URL]
- Miller, Gary J., "Political Science: The Science of Politics" (1986), Agathon Publishing
- "The 5 Types Of Organizational Structures: Part 1, The Hierarchy" (2015)[URL]
- "When Is Hierarchy Bad, and When Is it Not?" (2016)[URL]
- "Orthodox Religious Authority"[URL]
- Ouchi, William G., "TheSociology of Organizations: Structures and Relationships, Los Angeles" (2012), Sage
- "South Korea’s Chaegol" (2019)[URL]
- 박인규, "대순진리회 조직체계의 변화와 그 특성", 신종교연구, 40(40), pp.63~95 (2019), 한국신종교학회[DOI]
- 박인규, "일제강점기 증산계 종교운동 연구-차월곡의 보천교와 조정산의 무극도를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2019
- Park, Sangkyu, "Personal Lineage as the Main Organizational Principle in Daesoon Jinrihoe", The Journal of CESNUR, 2(5) (2018)[DOI]
- "The four Types of Organization"[URL]
- Sharf, Robert H., "Chinese and Tibetand Esoteric Buddhism" (2017), Brill
- Smith, M.G., "Corporations and Society: The Social Anthropology of Collective Action" (1974), Routledge
- Song, Ho Keun, "The Birth of a Welfare State in Korea : The Unfinished Symphony of Democratization and Globalization", Journal of East Asian Studies, 3(3) (2003)
- Song, Young Hack, "The Impact of Culture on the Management Values and Beliefs of Korean Firms", Journal of Comparative International Management, 1(1) (1998)
- Torry, Malcolm, "Managing Religion: The Management of Christian Religious and Faith. Volume 2" (2014), Palgrave MacMillan
- Tudor, Daniel, "Korea: The Impossible Country" (2012), Tuttle
- Winthrop, Robert H., "Dictionary of Concepts in Cultural Anthropology" (1991), ABC-CLIO
- "Corporate Title System in Korea: Hierarchy at the Workplace" (2017)[URL]