The Impact of Logistics Efficiency and Free Trade Agreements on Global Trade: Focusing on Total Trade Value
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze the impact of logistics efficiency on trade volume growth, and to examine the effects of lower tariffs resulting from free trade agreements. In order to measure the impact of logistics efficiency on trade volume growth, the export and import trade volume among 53 countries was introduced as the dependent variable. Macroeconomic indicators including annual average tariff rate, logistics efficiency indicators for port, air, railroad, road and container vessel connectivity, as well as dummy variables such as whether a free trade agreement was signed, were introduced as the explanatory variables. Bilateral panel data between trading nations was used to estimate the gravity panel model, and analysis followed the categorization: 1) separate inputs of the five logistics efficiency variables and 2) one aggregated input of the five variables as a single indicator. The analysis found that logistics efficiency had a statistically significant impact on bilateral trade volume growth, while the impact of lowering tariff rates on increasing trade was insignificant. In addition, logistics efficiency was found to have a greater impact on increasing trade volume than free trade agreements. These results imply that trade can be promoted more effectively by establishing and efficiently operating logistics-related infrastructure rather than traditional methods of reducing trade barriers such as lowering tariffs and signing free trade agreements.
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to empirically analyze the impact of logistics efficiency on trade volume growth, and to examine the effects of lower tariffs resulting from free trade agreements. In order to measure the impact of logistics efficiency on trade volume growth, the export and import trade volume among 53 countries was introduced as the dependent variable. Macroeconomic indicators including annual average tariff rate, logistics efficiency indicators for port, air, railroad, road and container vessel connectivity, as well as dummy variables such as whether a free trade agreement was signed, were introduced as the explanatory variables. Bilateral panel data between trading nations was used to estimate the gravity panel model, and analysis followed the categorization: 1) separate inputs of the five logistics efficiency variables and 2) one aggregated input of the five variables as a single indicator. The analysis found that logistics efficiency had a statistically significant impact on bilateral trade volume growth, while the impact of lowering tariff rates on increasing trade was insignificant. In addition, logistics efficiency was found to have a greater impact on increasing trade volume than free trade agreements. These results imply that trade can be promoted more effectively by establishing and efficiently operating logistics-related infrastructure rather than traditional methods of reducing trade barriers such as lowering tariffs and signing free trade agreements.
참고문헌 (21)
- What are the opportunities and challenges for ASEAN, "Ando, I", ERIA, ~, pp.ERIA Discussion Paper Series, EPIA-DP-2013-31 (2013)
- Analysis on the effects of logistics efficiency on trade flows in East Asian countries, "Bang, H.K", Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, ~, pp.Research Paper, 09-09 (2009)
- The strategic research on establishing trade facilitation general plan, "Choi, B. Y", Korea Institute for International Economic Policy, ~ (2015)
- Coughlin, C.C, "NAFTA and the changing pattern of state exports", Papers in Regional Science, 82, pp.427~450 (2003)
- Deardorff, A, "Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassic world", National Bureau of Economic Research, The Regionalization of the World Economy, 7~32 (1998)
- Dennis, A, "Trade facilitation and export diversification", The World Economy, 34, pp.101~122 (2011)
- Trade and growth in East Asian countries: Cause and Effect, "Frankel, J. A", NBER, 9~15, pp.NBER working paper 5732 (1996)
- Trade policy, trade costs, and developing country trade, "Hoekman, B", World Bank, 1,295~1,307, pp.Policy Research Working Paper 4797 (2008)
- Iwanow, T, "Trade facilitation and manufactured exports: Is Africa different", World Development, 37, pp.1039~1050 (2009)
- 김미아, "한-EFTA간 FTA의 무역확대 효과", EU연구, (26), pp.49~71 (2010), EU연구소[DOI]
- Analysis on the air cargo patterns according to changes in global trade environment, "Kim, S. Y", Korea Academy of International Business Management, 489~500 (2015)
- 이재화, "Culture, Network, and International Trade", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 13(2), pp.21~31 (2015), 정석물류통상연구원
- 이남구, "WTO 무역원활화 논의와 정책 대응방안에 관한 연구", 관세학회지, 6(1), pp.139~162 (2005), 한국관세학회
- 리신강, "Transport Connectivity and Regional Development in China", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 14(2), pp.142~155 (2016), 정석물류통상연구원[DOI]
- 남기찬, "한-칠레 자유무역협정이 부산항 물동량에 미치는 영향분석 - 대 칠레 수입 컨테이너화물 중심 -", 한국항해항만학회지, 37(6), pp.681~687 (2013), 한국항해항만학회
- 박홍균, "한·ASEAN FTA가 광양항 수출에 미치는 영향: 패널중력모형과 전향적 이동회귀의 적용", 한국항만경제학회지, 30(2), pp.133~143 (2014), 한국항만경제학회
- 박호, "국제교역환경변화에 따른 해상교역패턴 변화 분석 - 우리나라 주요 컨테이너 항만을 중심으로 -", 해운물류연구, 32(2), pp.239~254 (2016), 한국해운물류학회
- Mohamad REZA, "Liner Shipping Connectivity and International Trade in Maritime Southeast Asian Countries", Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 13(3), pp.43~74 (2015), 정석물류통상연구원
- Serhat, B, "Analyzing dependency between national logistics performance and competitiveness: Which logistics competence is core for national strategy", Journal of competitiveness, 4, pp.4~22 (2011)
- Sharma, S.C, "ASEAN: Economic integration and intra-regional trade", Applied Economics Letters, 7, pp.165~169 (2000)
- Shepherd, B, "Trade facilitation in ASEAN member countries : Measuring progress and assessing priorities", Journal of Asian Economics, 20, pp.367~383 (2009)
