산림탄소흡수원 증진을 위한 정책수단의 우선순위 결정
Determination of Priorities in the Forest Carbon Sink Enhancement Policies in the Republic of Korea
2
조회
0
다운로드
20
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
탄소흡수원으로써의 산림부문의 중요성이 점차 증가함에 따라 다양한 정책들이 고려되고 있다. 제한된 예산과 자원 여건 하에서 정책의 효율성을 추구하기 위하여 본 연구에서는 최고최저조정법을 이용하여 산림청의 10대 산림 탄소흡수원 증진 정책들의 우선순위를 결정하였다. 산림 분야 전문가 설문조사결과, 산림경영방식 및 시업체계 개선, 조림 및 식생복구 확대, 산림바이오매스 에너지 활용 및 이용시설 증대, 임목수집 시스템 및 재활용 체계 개선, REDD+ 사업 참여 확대 순으로 중요한 것으로 나타났다. 이 연구 결과는 향후 국내 산림탄소흡수원 확충을 위한 정부 핵심 정책을 수행함에 있어서 우선순위를 정하는데 중요한 정보를 제공할 것으로 기대한다.
Abstract
To secure effectiveness of policies under the limit of budget and resource availability, thisresearch sought to determine priorities among forest carbon enhancement programs of KoreaForest Service by utilizing the best-worst scaling method. Results of expert surveys reveal thaton average improvement of forest management plan and practice, afforestation/rehabilitation,expansion of biomass energy use and facilities, and enlarging REDD+ programs were among themost important. Results allow the government to make decisions about the priorities of forestcarbon enhancement policies.
참고문헌 (22)
- Auger P, "Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries", J. BUS. ETHICS, 70, pp.299~326 (2007)
- Casini L, "Consumer preferences of wine in Italy applying best-worst scaling", INT. J. WINE BUS. RES, 21(1), pp.64~78 (2009)
- Cohen S, "Measuring preference for product benefits across countries", sawtooth software conference (2003)
- Maximum difference scaling: improved measures of importance and preference for segmentation, "Cohen SH", Sawtooth Software Research Paper Series, ~ (2003)
- Cohen SH., "Applying best-worst scaling to wine marketing", INT. J. WINE BUS. RES, 21(1), pp.9~23 (2009)
- Finn A, "Determining the appropriate response to evidence of public concern: the case of food safety", J. PUBLIC POLICY MARK, 11(1), pp.12~25 (1992)
- Flynn TN, "Estimating preferences for a dermatology consultation using best-worst scaling: comparison of various methods of analysis", BMC MED. RES. METHODOL, 8, pp.1~12 (2008)
- Flynn TN, "Rescaling quality of live from discrete choice experiments for use as QALYs: a cautionary tale", Population Health Metrics, 6 (2008)
- Public attitude toward electricity alternatives: results from a survey of australian household working paper, "Gardener J", CSIRO Exploration $ Mining, ~ (2007)
- 김영환, "산림경영형 산림탄소상쇄 사업설계를 위한 주요 수종별베이스라인 흡수량 산정", 한국임학회지, 103(3), pp.439~445 (2014), 한국임학회[DOI]
- The 5th national forest plan(Modified) 2013-2017, "Korea Forest Service(KFS).", 233~ (2011)
- Preliminary study for establishing a forest carbon sink enhancement Plan, "Korea Rural Economic Institute(KREI).", Korea Forest Service, 192~ (2013)
- Lee JA, "Measuring values using best-worst scaling: the LOV example", PSYCHOL. MARKET, 24, pp.1043~1058 (2007)
- Lusk JL, "Food value", Ame. J. of Agri. Econ, 91(1), pp.184~196 (2009)
- Marley AAJ, "Some probabilistic models of best, worst, and best-worst choices", J. MATH. PSYCOL, 49, pp.464~480 (2005)
- Mueller S, "Is there more information in best-worst choice data? using the attitude heterogeneity structure to identify consumers segments", INT. J. WINE RES, 21(1), pp.24~40 (2009)
- Remaud H, "Building brand salience for commodity-based wine regions", INT. J. WINE RES, 21(1), pp.79~92 (2009)
- Rezaei J, "Best-worst multi-criteria decisionmaking method", Omega, 53(1), pp.49~57 (2015)
- The MaxDiff, "Web v6.0 Technical Paper", Sawtooth., 2007
- Stern NH, "The economics of climate change: the Stern review", pp.215~ (2007), Cambridge University press
- Thurstone LL., "A law of comparative judgment. psychological review", PSYCHOL. REV, 34, pp.273~286 (1927)
- Vick S., "Agency in health care, examining patients' preferences for attributes of the doctor-patient relationship", J. HEALTH ECON, 17, pp.587~605 (1998)