본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Can Participation Be Gender-Inclusive? Gender Roles, Development Projects and the Antamina Mining Company in Peru

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

The term ‘participation’ has become a principle guiding development projects since the 1980s. Even though the popularity of participation represents ongoing changes in development thinking which critically reflects the shortcomings of the previous project model, several scholars still express concerns about the disjuncture between the rhetoric and practice of participation, which ends up aggravating the exclusion of the previously excluded social groups. In recognition of such critiques, this article examines the exclusionary tendency of participatory development model with a particular focus on gender. For this purpose, this article comparatively analyzes the project participation by gender in four development projects which were implemented from 2006 to 2008 in the district of San Marcos, a Peruvian Andean village. In reference to the two influential frameworks in the development policies and research: Women in Development (WID) and Gender and Development (GAD), this article proposes the following two research questions: 1) whether participation was more exclusionary to women and men; and 2) whether women’s project participation entailed changes in gender relations which can be considered empowering. In conclusion, this article argues that: 1) development projects were not necessarily more exclusionary to women than to men especially when the previous gender roles corroborated with new roles imposed by the project participations; and 2) the project participation rarely led to any substantial changes in gender status which I measure through the analysis of women’s control of access and their roles in decision making at diverse levels.

Abstract

The term ‘participation’ has become a principle guiding development projects since the 1980s. Even though the popularity of participation represents ongoing changes in development thinking which critically reflects the shortcomings of the previous project model, several scholars still express concerns about the disjuncture between the rhetoric and practice of participation, which ends up aggravating the exclusion of the previously excluded social groups. In recognition of such critiques, this article examines the exclusionary tendency of participatory development model with a particular focus on gender. For this purpose, this article comparatively analyzes the project participation by gender in four development projects which were implemented from 2006 to 2008 in the district of San Marcos, a Peruvian Andean village. In reference to the two influential frameworks in the development policies and research: Women in Development (WID) and Gender and Development (GAD), this article proposes the following two research questions: 1) whether participation was more exclusionary to women and men; and 2) whether women’s project participation entailed changes in gender relations which can be considered empowering. In conclusion, this article argues that: 1) development projects were not necessarily more exclusionary to women than to men especially when the previous gender roles corroborated with new roles imposed by the project participations; and 2) the project participation rarely led to any substantial changes in gender status which I measure through the analysis of women’s control of access and their roles in decision making at diverse levels.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. Babb, Florence E., "Women and Men in Vicos, Peru: A Case of Unequal Development, In Peruvian Contexts of Change" (1985), Transaction Books
  2. Ballard, Chris, "Resource Wars: The Anthropology of Mining", Annual Review of Anthropology, 32, pp.287~313 (2003)
  3. Bebbington, Anthony, "Mining and Development in Peru: with Special Reference to the Rio Blanco Project" (2007), Peru Support Group
  4. Cernea, Michael M., "Knowledge from Social Science for Development Policies and Projects, In Putting People First: Sociological Variables in Rural Development" (1991), Oxford University Press
  5. Chambers, Robert, "Paradigm shifts and the practice of participatory research and development, In Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice" (1995), ITDG Publishing
  6. Cleaver, Frances, "Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development", Journal of International Development, 11, pp.597~612 (1999)
  7. Reporte Sostenibilidad, "CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina)", Compañía Minera Antamina S.A., ~ (2001)
  8. Sustainability Report, "CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina)", Compañía Minera Antamina S.A., ~ (2005)
  9. Sustainability Report, "CMA (Compañía Minera Antamina)", Compañía Minera Antamina S.A., ~ (2007)
  10. CMA, "Fondo Minero Antamina: Bases para la Selección de Proyectos" (2007), Compañía Minera Antamina S.A
  11. Cooke, Bill, "The Case for Participation as Tyranny, In Participation: The New Tyranny?" (2001), Zed Books
  12. Crewe, Emma, "Whose Development? An Ethnography of Aid" (1988), Zed Books
  13. Deere, Carmen Diana, "Peasant Production, Proletarianization, and the Sexual Division of Labor in the Andes", Development and the Sexual Division of Labor. Signs, 7(2), pp.338~360 (1981)
  14. Informe Narrativo, "FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural)", ACUDIP, ~ (2006)
  15. Informe Narrativo, "FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural)", ACUDIP, ~ (2007)
  16. Informe Narrativo, "FOCADER (Fortalecimiento de Capacidades para el Desarrollo Rural)", ACUDIP, ~ (2008)
  17. Hamilton, Sarah, "The Two-Headed Household: Gender and Rural Development in the Ecuadorean Andes", pp.1998
  18. IDMA, "Balance de la Labor Institucional IDMA 2005" (2005), IDMA
  19. IDMA, "Balance de la Labor Institucional IDMA 2006" (2006), IDMA
  20. Klohn Crippen-SVS, S.A., "Estudio de Impacto Ambiental _ Compañía Minera Antamina" (1998), Compañía Minera Antamina
  21. Mehta, Lyla, "The Double Bind: A Gender Analysis of Forced Displacement and Resettlement", paper prepared for the workshop “Engendering Resettlement Policies and Programmes in India (2002)
  22. Moser, Caroline O. N, "Mainstreaming Gender and Development in the World Bank: Progress and Recommendations" (1999), World Bank
  23. Nelson, Nici, "Power and Participatory Development: Theory and Practice" (1995), ITDG Publishing
  24. Szablowski, David, "Legitimacy and Regulation in the Global Economy: Legal Mediation of Conflicts between Communities and Transnational Mining Companies", 박사, pp.2004
  25. Visvanathan, Nalini, "Introduction, In The Women, Gender, and Development Reader" (1997), Atlantic Highlands: Zed Books
  26. Woost, Michael, "Alternative Vocabularies of Development?‘Community and ‘Participation in Development Discourses in Sri Lanka, In Discourses of Development:Anthropological Perspectives" (1997), Berg
  27. Woost, Michael, "The Common Sense of Development and the Struggle for Participatory Development in Sri Lanka, In Economic Development: An Anthropological Approach" (2002), Rowman & Littlefield

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)