민사법제의 쟁점과 전망
Issues and Prospects of Civil Law in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This year is a meaningful and glorious year in the history of Korea and the Korean civil law. Because this year is the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the Korean Government 1948, and at same time the 50th anniversary of the legislation of the Korean Civil Code 1958. Also 48 years have been passed since implementation of the new Korean Civil Code from January 1, 1960. Law constitutes a part of culture of a nation. Civil law is a core element of laws in a nation. Legislation of civil code means and symbolizes that the nation has its own unique legal culture. Further, it means that the nation has its own identity. Therefore, almost every new independent nation legislates its own civil code after its liberation. Korea has also legislated its own Civil Code after 10 years of the establishment of the Korean Government. The legislated new Civil Code has been different from the old Civil Code in its contents, which was the then Japanese Civil Code. Especially, in the part of the family law and the real property law of the new Korean Civil Code many unique contents have been prescribed, which have been differentiated from those of the old Civil Code. Since the legislation of the new Civil Code, the part of family law has been relatively well amended in conformity with social changes, but the part of property law has a little lacked in its amendment. Therefore, the property law in the Korean Civil Code has been not kept up with social and economical changes after its enforcement. In order to renovate the property law of the Civil Code, an amendment draft had been elaborated by a special committee under the Ministry of Justice after deep consultations for 5 years long from 1999 and it as a bill has been submitted to the National Assembly in 2004. However, it has not been taken into consideration and deliberation until now. It was automatically repealed as the term of membership of the National Assembly was expired at the end of May of this year. Maybe, a new amendment draft shall be prepared by the Ministry of Justice and submitted to the National Assembly once again. The amendment draft has contained so many controversial contents, against which many civil law scholars have strongly and sharply criticized. Without a sufficient consideration with the criticized contents by the special committee, the amendment draft has been elaborated and submitted to the National Assembly. It would be the most important reason, why the bill has been not deliberated by the National Assembly and has been automatically repealed. In the new amendment draft which will be prepared in near future, controversial articles shall be more deeply re-examined and more suitably modified for harmonization and balance with diverse opinions. Furthermore, in the new amendment draft the globalization in the civil law should be adopted and realized, of which trend is worldwide main stream in these days and of which symbolic law is the United Nations Convention on the Contract for the International Sale of Goods(CISG). Besides, many other tasks are assigned to academics of civil law in Korea. Firstly, uniquenesses of the Korean civil law shall be found out from the traditional law and modernized into the current Civil Code. Secondly, the socialistic civil law in the North-Korea shall be transformed into civil law suitable to the socialistic market economy. Thirdly, the common law (ius commune) in the North East Asian region shall be found out from common sources of laws and formulated in the future in cooporation with academics of neighboring countries.
Abstract
This year is a meaningful and glorious year in the history of Korea and the Korean civil law. Because this year is the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the Korean Government 1948, and at same time the 50th anniversary of the legislation of the Korean Civil Code 1958. Also 48 years have been passed since implementation of the new Korean Civil Code from January 1, 1960. Law constitutes a part of culture of a nation. Civil law is a core element of laws in a nation. Legislation of civil code means and symbolizes that the nation has its own unique legal culture. Further, it means that the nation has its own identity. Therefore, almost every new independent nation legislates its own civil code after its liberation. Korea has also legislated its own Civil Code after 10 years of the establishment of the Korean Government. The legislated new Civil Code has been different from the old Civil Code in its contents, which was the then Japanese Civil Code. Especially, in the part of the family law and the real property law of the new Korean Civil Code many unique contents have been prescribed, which have been differentiated from those of the old Civil Code. Since the legislation of the new Civil Code, the part of family law has been relatively well amended in conformity with social changes, but the part of property law has a little lacked in its amendment. Therefore, the property law in the Korean Civil Code has been not kept up with social and economical changes after its enforcement. In order to renovate the property law of the Civil Code, an amendment draft had been elaborated by a special committee under the Ministry of Justice after deep consultations for 5 years long from 1999 and it as a bill has been submitted to the National Assembly in 2004. However, it has not been taken into consideration and deliberation until now. It was automatically repealed as the term of membership of the National Assembly was expired at the end of May of this year. Maybe, a new amendment draft shall be prepared by the Ministry of Justice and submitted to the National Assembly once again. The amendment draft has contained so many controversial contents, against which many civil law scholars have strongly and sharply criticized. Without a sufficient consideration with the criticized contents by the special committee, the amendment draft has been elaborated and submitted to the National Assembly. It would be the most important reason, why the bill has been not deliberated by the National Assembly and has been automatically repealed. In the new amendment draft which will be prepared in near future, controversial articles shall be more deeply re-examined and more suitably modified for harmonization and balance with diverse opinions. Furthermore, in the new amendment draft the globalization in the civil law should be adopted and realized, of which trend is worldwide main stream in these days and of which symbolic law is the United Nations Convention on the Contract for the International Sale of Goods(CISG). Besides, many other tasks are assigned to academics of civil law in Korea. Firstly, uniquenesses of the Korean civil law shall be found out from the traditional law and modernized into the current Civil Code. Secondly, the socialistic civil law in the North-Korea shall be transformed into civil law suitable to the socialistic market economy. Thirdly, the common law (ius commune) in the North East Asian region shall be found out from common sources of laws and formulated in the future in cooporation with academics of neighboring countries.
참고문헌 (39)
- 김상용, "민법총칙, 全訂版增補" (2006)
- 김상용, "비교계약법" (2002)
- 김상용, "法史와 法政策:로마民法學史法 중심" (2004)
- 김상용, "法史와 法政策: 게르만法史, 敎會法史, 獨逸民法學史 중심" (2005)
- 김상용, "法史와 法政策: 韓國法史 중심" (2006)
- 민법개정안연구회, "민법개정안의견서" (2002)
- 새로운 계약유형의 입법화에 관한 연구, "새로운 계약유형의 입법화에 관한 연구,법무부", 법무부, ~ (1999)
- 崔松和, "21世紀 東北亞文化共同體의 構想" (2004)
- 최흥섭, "유엔국제매매법:국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약" (1997)
- 韓國東北亞知識人連帶, "東北亞 共同體를 向하여:아시아 地域統合의 꿈과 現實" (2004)
- 김상용, ""민법(재산법)개정안 중 문제조항들에 대한 의견”: 국회입법조사관과의 간담회(2005. 5. 30) 보고", ~ (2005)
- 김상용, "“民法(財産法)改正의 必要性과 當爲性”, 2007. 2. 4. 법무부 제출 時論", ~ (2007)
- 김상용, "민법개정에 관한 한국민사법학회 회원들게 드리는 글, 2007. 6. 16", ~ (2007)
- 박영복, "CISG상의 계약책임 구조에 대한 비교법적 분석", 國際去來法硏究, 14(2) (2006), 국제거래법학회
- 석광현, "국제물품매매협약 가입과 한국법에의 수용", 상사법연구, 21(2) (2002), 한국상사법학회
- 석광현, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 국제연합협약(CISG)상의 본질적 계약위반", 법학논총, 23(2) (2006), 한양대학교 법학연구소
- 최흥섭, "국제물품매매계약에 관한 유엔협약과 우리법의 비교적 검토", 比較私法, 11(3) (2004), 한국비교사법학회
- D?ner Heinrich, "Ausgar Staudinger, Schuldrechtsmodernisierung: Systematische Einf?rung und sysnoptische Gesamtdarstellung, 2. Aufl., Baden-Baden, Nomos", ~ (2002)
- Huber Christian, "Das Neue Schadensersatzrecht" (2003)
- J, "von Staudingers Kommentar zum B?gerlichen Gesetzbuch mit Einf?rungsgesetz und Nebengesetzen", ~ (2004)
- R?er Jan-Henderik, "Secured Lending in Eastern Europe: Comparative Law of Secured Transactions and EBRD Model Law" (2007)
- Das Schuldrecht, "Systematische Darstellung der Schuldrechtsreform, hrsg. von Harm Peter Westermann, Stuttgart, Richard Boorberg Verlag", ~ (2002)
- Schuldrechtsmodernisierung, "zusammengestellt und eingeleitet von Claus-Wihlem Canaris, C. H. Beck", ~ (2002)
- Worldwide Harmonization of Private Law and Regional Economic Integration, "Basedow Jurgen", Uniform Law Review, ~, pp.NS-Vol. VIII (2003)
- Harmonization of International and Regional Trade Law: the UNICITRAL Experience, "Bazinas Spros V.", Uniform Law Review, ~, pp.NS-Vol. VIII (2003)
- Hondius Edward, "Towards a European Civil Code in Towards a European Civil Code, 2. Ed" (1998)
- Karlsruhe Forum, "2005: Schuldrechtsmodernisierung- Erfahrungen seit dem 1. Januar 2002, hrsg. von Egon Lorenz, Karlsruhe, Verlag Versicherungswirtschaft GmbH", ~ (2006)
- Grundmann Birgit, "Die Mietrechtsreform: Wesentliche Inhalte und Anderungen gegenuber der bisherigen Rechtslage", NJW, 31 (2001)
- Hahnchen Susanne, "Das Gesetz zur Anpassung der Formvorschriften des Privatrechts und anderer Vorschriften an den modernen Rechtsgeschaftsverkehr", NJW, 39 (2001)
- Huber Ulrich, "Leistungsstorung", Gutachten und Vorschlage zur Uberarbeitung des Schuldrechts, 1 (1981)
- Kim Sang Yong, "Impacts of CISG in Korea", National Report of the Republic of Korea to the Congress of IACL(International Academy of Comparative Law) to be held in Mexico City, pp.13~15 (2008)
- Kohler Hulmut, "Einfuhrung" (2007)
- Schnader William A., "A Short History of the Preparation and Enactment of the Uniform Commercial Code", University of Miami Law Review, 22(1) (1967)
- Sigman Harry C., "Security in Movables in the United States: Uniform Commercial Code Article 9: A Basis for Comparison" (2004)
- Wagner Gerhard, "as Zweite Schadensersatzrechtsanderungsgesetz", NJW, 55(29) (2002)
- Zimmermann Reinhard, "oman Law and European Legal Unity", Towards a European Civil Code, 2 (1998), Kluwer Law International
- 金相容, "作爲東北亞普通法的統一買賣法的立法方向, 中日民商法硏究 第4卷" (2006)
- 金相容, "東北アジア普通法の形成可能性に對する檢討と前望", 東洋文化硏究, (8) (2006), 學習院大學 東洋文化硏究所
- 金相容, "韓國民法改正の動向とバンテクテン: Trend of Korean Civil Code Reform and Pandekten)", 早稻田大學 比較法硏究所 創立 50周年 記念國際シンポジウム: バンテクテンのゆくえ - グロ-バル時代の法のタ-ミノロジ: ヨ-ロッパ·東アジアにおける法移植に關する比較法的硏究 (2007)
