채권시장에서의 신용평가기능 개선을 위한 정책방향
Policy Recommendations for Enhancing the Role of Credit Rating Agencies in the Debt Market
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
우리나라의 회사채시장은 양적으로 꾸준한 성장세를 지속하였으나 여전히 질적 성숙이 그에 미치지 못하는 것으로 평가되고 있으며 외환위기 이후에도 대우채, 현대채, 카드채 사태 등의 금융시장 불안을 반복적으로 초래하였다. 회사채시장의 질적 발전이 이루어지지 못한 것은 무엇보다도 관련 인프라의 적절한 구축이 이루어지지 못한 데 크게 영향 받은 것으로 판단된다. 특히 신용평가산업은 실제 발행기업의 채무상환능력을 평가하는 정보의 생성기능을 적절하게 담당하지 못한 채 제도의 이식 수준에 머물고 있다. 본 연구는 미국 SEC 및 미국 학계에서 제기되고 있는 신용평가사제도 개선 논의를 고려하여 우리나라의 신용평가사제도 개선의 가능성을 모색한다. 특히, 우리나라 특유의 상황에 의해 발생하고 있는 우리나라 신용평가산업 특유의 문제들을 소유·지배구조 및 부수업무 수행에 따르는 이해상충, 역사적 발전과정, 신용등급에 대한 법리적 해석 및 경제·사회적 차이에 따르는 문제로 분류하여 지적하고 대응방향을 제시하였다.
Abstract
Even after significant changes in the financial market due to the financial crisis the corporate debt markets have seen created turmoil caused such as by Daewoo, Hyundai, and credit card companies in the financial system. These lagging improvements of corporate debt markets are mainly due to inadequate market infrastructure. Specifically, the credit rating agencies have not been successful in providing proper and timely information on the loan repayment abilities of debtors. This study analyzes past performance of credit rating agencies in Korea and tries to develop policy implications to improve the role of credit rating agencies based on the recent discussions on credit rating agencies by academics and the SEC. In addition, this study focuses on unique operation environments of Korean credit rating agencies, which have kept credit rating agencies from providing fair, timely, and useful information. To warrant proper operation of credit rating agencies, it is essential to cope with unique problems in Korean credit rating agencies. We classify the unique problems of Korean credit rating agencies into ownership and governance structure, conflict of interests due to ancillary fee-based business, legal recognition of credit rating in the court, and code of conduct problem, etc. and propose policy directions to improve the quality and credibility of credit ratings.
참고문헌 (28)
- "신용평가산업의 발전방향" (2000), 한국금융연구원
- "신용등급 최근의 몇 가지 오해에 대한 설명" (2004)
- "신용평가에 따른 손해배상청구의 법적 문제", 14(2) (2004), 한국경영 법률학회
- "신용평가제도의 바람직한 방향" (2001), 한국증권연구원
- "신용등급변경이 주식가격평가에 미치는 영향", 28(4) (1999)
- "2003년 신용카드 사태의 교훈과 신용평가사의 시각" (2003)
- "한국기업평가(주) 부도율 분석 1998-2003" (2004)
- "부도율 분석" (2004)
- "장기신용등급 결과 분석" (2004)
- "Rating Agencies Survey Accuracy Timeliness and Regulation" (2002)
- "” Journal of Finance" (1989)
- "Default and Returns on High Yield Bonds Analysis through 1997" (1998), NYU Salomon Center
- "Assessing Credit Rating Agencies by Bond Issuers and Institutional Investors", 29 (2002)
- "Credit Ratings and Complementary Sources of Credit Quality Information" (2000)
- "The New Basel Accord" (2003)
- "The Credit Rating Industry", (5) (1995)
- "Market Lessons for Gatekeepters", 92 (1998)
- "Gatekeepers Failure and Reform The Challenge of Fashioning Relevant Reforms", 237 (2003), Center for Law and Economics Studies Columbia Law School
- "Explaining the Rate Spread on Corporate Bonds", LVI(1) (2001)
- "“The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency" (1984)
- "The Siskel and Ebert of Financial Markets? Two Thumbs Down for the Credit Rating Agencies", 77(3) (1999)
- "Barbarians at the Gatekeepers? A Proposal for a Modified Strict Liability Regime", (14) (2004), University of San Diego School of Law
- "Financial Oversight of Enron The SEC and Private Sector Watchdogs" (2002)
- "Concept Release on Rating Agencies and the Use of Credit Ratings Under the Federal Securities Laws" (2003)
- "Report on the Role and Function of Credit Rating Agencies in the Operation of the Securities Markets" (2003)
- "An Historic Primer on the Business of Credit Rating" (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers
- "Don't Like the Power of the Bond Rating Firms? Basel 2 Will Only Make It Worse", 2 (2002)
- "The Credit Rating Industry An Industrial Organization Analysis" (2002), Kluwer Academic Publishers