범죄피해자의 정신적ㆍ신체적 피해의 치료 및 예방에 관한 정부시책의 비교 연구 - 한ㆍ일 양국의 「범죄피해자기본법」과 「범죄피해자 보호ㆍ지원에 관한 기본계획」상의 내용을 중심으로 -
A Comparative Study on the Healing and Preventing Policies of Mental and Physical Harm Regarding Crime Victims
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Every crime victim suffers from various damages, such as physical harm, mental harm, and financial harm. To make matters worse, they would get secondary victimization in the course of the criminal procedure through the unpleasant experiences being blamed or alienated by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. Finally, a lot of crime victims are likely to be revictimized in that process. Many countries have attempted to solve these victim problems. Both Korea and Japan are also making every efforts to find and establish proper victim policies which can support and protect victims effectively. Among many victim policies, it is particularly urgent to develop healing and preventing policies of mental and physical harm because, not developed enough, victims would be easily fallen into painful situations. As a result of that, victims are more likely to be revictimized. Nevertheless, healthcare and welfare services for preventing victim's physical and mental harm are not sufficient until now in Korea. With this reason, both Korea and Japan have enacted the “Basic Act of Crime Victims(BACV)” and the “Basic Plan for Crime Victims(BPCV)”. The BPCV is based on the BACV. The BACV and BPCV of both countries are very similar, but some of the policies are different from each other. For preventing and healing the physical and mental harm, both countries are taking a lot of measures, especially to secure the personal safety, prevent the secondary victimization, and promote the level of medical and social welfare services. Compared to the Korean victims policies, Japanese policies are characterized by having more concrete rules for the enhancement of healthcare and welfare service systems for female and juvenile victims. Thus, the Korean government should try to adopt the good aspects of the Japanese victim policies.
Abstract
Every crime victim suffers from various damages, such as physical harm, mental harm, and financial harm. To make matters worse, they would get secondary victimization in the course of the criminal procedure through the unpleasant experiences being blamed or alienated by police officers, prosecutors, and judges. Finally, a lot of crime victims are likely to be revictimized in that process. Many countries have attempted to solve these victim problems. Both Korea and Japan are also making every efforts to find and establish proper victim policies which can support and protect victims effectively. Among many victim policies, it is particularly urgent to develop healing and preventing policies of mental and physical harm because, not developed enough, victims would be easily fallen into painful situations. As a result of that, victims are more likely to be revictimized. Nevertheless, healthcare and welfare services for preventing victim's physical and mental harm are not sufficient until now in Korea. With this reason, both Korea and Japan have enacted the “Basic Act of Crime Victims(BACV)” and the “Basic Plan for Crime Victims(BPCV)”. The BPCV is based on the BACV. The BACV and BPCV of both countries are very similar, but some of the policies are different from each other. For preventing and healing the physical and mental harm, both countries are taking a lot of measures, especially to secure the personal safety, prevent the secondary victimization, and promote the level of medical and social welfare services. Compared to the Korean victims policies, Japanese policies are characterized by having more concrete rules for the enhancement of healthcare and welfare service systems for female and juvenile victims. Thus, the Korean government should try to adopt the good aspects of the Japanese victim policies.
참고문헌 (30)
- 경찰청, "경찰백서", ~ (2007)
- 국회법제사법위원회, "범죄피해자구조법 일부개정 법률안 검토보고서", ~ (2005)
- 김용세, "피해자학" (2003), 형설출판사
- "형사화해제도에 관한 형사사법 실무자의 인식", 피해자학연구, 14(1) (2006)
- "일본 범죄피해자보호법의 피해자보호시책", 피해자학연구, 9(1)
- 김재민, "범죄피해자대책론" (2006), 진리탐구사
- "가정폭력 피해자 신변안전확보 과정에서의 수사경찰의 위험성 평가에 관한 연구", 피해자학연구, 14(2) (2006)
- "신형사소송법의 범죄피해자보호적 규정에 관한 연구", 경찰대학 논문집, 27 (2007)
- 법무부, "범죄피해자 보호ㆍ지원에 관한 기본계획(2007-2011)", ~ (2006)
- "범죄피해자 보호ㆍ지원에 관한 기본계획(2007-2011)의 2007년도 시행계획", ~
- 박병식, "경찰의 범죄피해자보호-일본 경찰의 피해자대책을 중심으로-", 한국공안행정학회, (18) (2004)
- 신동운, "일본 형사수속법" (2003), 법문사
- 이승호, "피해자와 민간의 형사절차 참여를 위한 방안", 형사법연구, (19) (2003)
- 이재상, "형사절차상 피해자보호방안" (1993), 한국형사정책연구원
- 조성용, "형사소송법상 피해자를 위한 형사기록열람권의 문제점과 개선방안,-독일형사소송법(제406e조)을 참고하여-", 한국형사법학회 춘계학술회의 자료집 (2001)
- 천진호, "범죄피해자의 권리확보 방안", 한국피해자학회 2006년 추계학술회의 자료집 (2006)
- 형사정책연구원, "범죄신고 보상제도에 관한 연구", ~ (1999)
- Buzawa, E., "Domestic Violence:The Criminal Justice Response" (2003), Sage
- Goldstein,H., "Problem-oriented Policing" (1990), McGraw-Hill
- Government of Japan, "Basic Plan for Crime Victims, etc.", ~ (2005)
- Government of South Australia, "Information for Victims of Crime", ~ (2006)
- Morash & Ford, "Directing the Future of Community Policing , The Move to Community Policing" (2002), Sage
- Moriarty,Laura J., "Policing and Victims" (2002), Prentice Hall
- Rothbaum, B. O., "A Prospective Examination of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder in Rape Victims", Journal of Traumatic Stress, 5 (1992)
- Skogan, Wesley, "Fairness and Effectiveness in Policing" (2003), The National Academies
- Tobolowsky,Peggy M., "Crime Victim Rights and Remedies" (2001), Carolina Academic Press
- Wallace,Harvey, "Victimology" (1998), Califonia State University
- 警察公論, "警察本部長による犯罪被害者に對する援助の實施に關する指針の槪要 , 2002. 5月號", ~ (2002)
- 警察公論, "犯罪被害者等早期援助團體に關する規則 , 2002. 5月號", ~ (2002)
- 宮澤浩一, "被害者學の現況", 被害者學硏究 (1992), 日本被害者學會
