본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

방문구강보건사업의 운영현황 및 보건(지)소 치과위생사의 견해

State of Visiting Oral Health Programs and the Views of Dental Hygienists in Public Dental Clinics

0

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류치의학

초록

The purpose of this study was to examine the state of visiting oral health programs and the opinions of dental hygienists on the programs in a bid to help boost the efficiency of visiting oral health programs. The subjects in this study were 341 dental hygienists in public dental clinics across the nation. After their views were investigated, the following findings were given: 1. In regard to the management of visiting oral health programs, 44.3 percent of the respondents carried out visiting oral health programs, and 48.3 percent of that group did that in association with visiting health care programs. There were differences among the public dental clinics in beneficiaries of visiting oral health programs, beneficiary selection criteria and the details of oral health programs, which indicated the necessity of the development of standardized models. 2. As to difficulties in fulfilling visiting health care programs, a shortage of professional knowledge was viewed as the greatest hurdle. All their scores were above average, which implied that they were not able to perform the programs successfully. 3. As for the necessity and additional expected effects of visiting oral health programs, the largest number of the dental hygienists who carried them out expected that the programs would serve to change the mind-set of locals about themselves. And the others who didn't placed the most emphasis on cooperation from other departments, and the two groups had a statistically significantly different opinion. 4. Concerning the details of visiting health care programs, the dental hygienists who performed the programs found it most necessary to provide oral health education to employees and families to be visited. The others who didn't considered it most necessary to offer oral health education to people to be visited. The necessity of denture and prosthesis was least stressed by both groups, and they took a significantly different view of treatment for dental diseases, denture and prosthesis. 5. Regarding how to bolster visiting health care programs, the dental hygienist group that carried them out put more emphasis on everything suggested in the survey. Specifically, they attached greater importance to securing sufficient budget, establishing legal foundation, setting up an administration system and determining the directions for the programs in a realistic manner, which signified the desperate need for administrative and institutional backing.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the state of visiting oral health programs and the opinions of dental hygienists on the programs in a bid to help boost the efficiency of visiting oral health programs. The subjects in this study were 341 dental hygienists in public dental clinics across the nation. After their views were investigated, the following findings were given: 1. In regard to the management of visiting oral health programs, 44.3 percent of the respondents carried out visiting oral health programs, and 48.3 percent of that group did that in association with visiting health care programs. There were differences among the public dental clinics in beneficiaries of visiting oral health programs, beneficiary selection criteria and the details of oral health programs, which indicated the necessity of the development of standardized models. 2. As to difficulties in fulfilling visiting health care programs, a shortage of professional knowledge was viewed as the greatest hurdle. All their scores were above average, which implied that they were not able to perform the programs successfully. 3. As for the necessity and additional expected effects of visiting oral health programs, the largest number of the dental hygienists who carried them out expected that the programs would serve to change the mind-set of locals about themselves. And the others who didn't placed the most emphasis on cooperation from other departments, and the two groups had a statistically significantly different opinion. 4. Concerning the details of visiting health care programs, the dental hygienists who performed the programs found it most necessary to provide oral health education to employees and families to be visited. The others who didn't considered it most necessary to offer oral health education to people to be visited. The necessity of denture and prosthesis was least stressed by both groups, and they took a significantly different view of treatment for dental diseases, denture and prosthesis. 5. Regarding how to bolster visiting health care programs, the dental hygienist group that carried them out put more emphasis on everything suggested in the survey. Specifically, they attached greater importance to securing sufficient budget, establishing legal foundation, setting up an administration system and determining the directions for the programs in a realistic manner, which signified the desperate need for administrative and institutional backing.

참고문헌 (12)

  1. 구강보건정책연구회, "대한공중보건의사협의회, 대한보건치과위생사회. 보건소 구강보건사업 표준모형 개발을 위한 기초연구", 구강보건정책연구회, pp.3~6 (2000)
  2. 연세대학교 간호대학, "건강증진기금사업지원단. 보건소 방문보건사업 인력 교육․훈련 프로그램 개발", pp.9~15 (2003), 건강증진기금사업지원단
  3. 안선희, "보건소 방문간호사업 간호활동 분석", 석사, pp.2000
  4. 고일선, "?2000년 보건소 공공근로 방문간호사업 평가", Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing, 32(3), pp.344~354 (2002), 한국간호과학회
  5. 양정혜, "방문보건사업과 재가노인복지서비스 연계방안에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2005
  6. 보건복지부, "2003 국민구강건강실태조사", ~ (2004)
  7. 보건복지부, "2006 국민구강건강실태조사", ~ (2007)
  8. 신선정, "보건소 노인 방문구강보건사업 현황조사", 대한구강보건학회지, 31(3), pp.355~365 (2007), 대한구강보건학회
  9. 정세환, "보건소 구강건강증진 프로그램 표준화와 지침서 개발 연구", 강릉대학교·건강증진기금사업지원단, 50, pp.167~171 (2003)
  10. 최진수, "방문보건사업의 관리운영 및 활성화 방안에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.2002
  11. 김철신, "용인시 처인구 거동불편노인의 구강보건진료 수요조사", 대한구강보건학회지, 31(4), pp.559~567 (2007), 대한구강보건학회
  12. 황윤숙, "보건분야 치과위생사들의 건강증진사업을 위한 전문교육 필요도 조사", 한국치위생학회지, 7(4), pp.611~625 (2007), 한국치위생학회

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)