신종인플루엔자 확산에 따른 지식과 예방행동에 관한 연구
A study on knowledge of influenza A(H1N1) and preventive behavior in the midst of the spread of the flu
0
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to examine selected people's knowledge of Influenza A(HINI), their self-efficacy, social norms, awareness of the gravity of the infection of the flu, behavioral intention, preventive behavior, the impact of their knowledge of the flu on those variables and the relationship of the variables, as the spread of the flu has been accelerated. Methods : The subjects in this study were 484 health-related majors at two selected colleges selected by random sampling from the metropolitan area, on whom a survey was conducted from October 5 to 9, 2009. Results : The findings of the study were as follows: 1. As for connections between knowledge of the 2009 H1N1 and self-efficacy, the students who were knowledgeable about the flu got a mean of 3.24, and those whose knowledge was on an intermediate level got 3.08. The students who didn't know well about that got 2.91. The students who were better informed were ahead of those who were less informed in terms of self-efficacy, and the intergroup gap was statistically significant(p<0.01). 2. In relation to self-efficacy, the better-informed students scored higher than the less-informed ones in both of the two items: whether to know how to cope with the spread of the 2009 H1N1(p<0.01), and whether to be able to be ready for the spread of it(p<0.01). The intergroup gaps were statistically significant. 3. In regard to relationship between knowledge of the flu and the gravity of the infection, those who were better knowledgeable took a more serious view of the consequence of the infection when they were asked a question whether being infected with the flu might lead to death (p<0.05). 4. Concerning links between the knowledge and behavioral intention, the better-informed group had an intention to behave in a more discreet manner than the less-informed group when two related questions were given: whether to intend to cover the mouth with a tissue not to be infected by the flu in case of having a cough or sneezing(p<0.05), and whether to carefully consider meeting someone infected by that(p<0.001). 5. As to relationship between the knowledge and preventive behavior, knowledge of the 2009 H1N1 made no statistically significant differences to every kind of preventive behavior. 6. Self-efficacy had a positive correlation to social norms(r=0.575***), behavioral intention(r=0.193***) and preventive behavior(r=207***), and social norms were positively correlated to behavioral intention (r=0.269***), and preventive behavior(r=0.208***). Awareness of the gravity of the flu had a positive correlation to behavioral intention (r=0.270***), and behavioral intention was positively correlated to preventive behavior(r=0.516). Conclusions : The knowledge of the students about Influence A(H1N1) and their preventive behavior were analyzed in association with the spread of the flu, and there were no differences in actual preventive behavior though they were not the same in terms of behavioral intention. Therefore health education programs should be prepared to improve not only their knowledge but their attitude and preventive skills to boost their preventive behavior.
Abstract
Objectives : The purpose of this study was to examine selected people's knowledge of Influenza A(HINI), their self-efficacy, social norms, awareness of the gravity of the infection of the flu, behavioral intention, preventive behavior, the impact of their knowledge of the flu on those variables and the relationship of the variables, as the spread of the flu has been accelerated. Methods : The subjects in this study were 484 health-related majors at two selected colleges selected by random sampling from the metropolitan area, on whom a survey was conducted from October 5 to 9, 2009. Results : The findings of the study were as follows: 1. As for connections between knowledge of the 2009 H1N1 and self-efficacy, the students who were knowledgeable about the flu got a mean of 3.24, and those whose knowledge was on an intermediate level got 3.08. The students who didn't know well about that got 2.91. The students who were better informed were ahead of those who were less informed in terms of self-efficacy, and the intergroup gap was statistically significant(p<0.01). 2. In relation to self-efficacy, the better-informed students scored higher than the less-informed ones in both of the two items: whether to know how to cope with the spread of the 2009 H1N1(p<0.01), and whether to be able to be ready for the spread of it(p<0.01). The intergroup gaps were statistically significant. 3. In regard to relationship between knowledge of the flu and the gravity of the infection, those who were better knowledgeable took a more serious view of the consequence of the infection when they were asked a question whether being infected with the flu might lead to death (p<0.05). 4. Concerning links between the knowledge and behavioral intention, the better-informed group had an intention to behave in a more discreet manner than the less-informed group when two related questions were given: whether to intend to cover the mouth with a tissue not to be infected by the flu in case of having a cough or sneezing(p<0.05), and whether to carefully consider meeting someone infected by that(p<0.001). 5. As to relationship between the knowledge and preventive behavior, knowledge of the 2009 H1N1 made no statistically significant differences to every kind of preventive behavior. 6. Self-efficacy had a positive correlation to social norms(r=0.575***), behavioral intention(r=0.193***) and preventive behavior(r=207***), and social norms were positively correlated to behavioral intention (r=0.269***), and preventive behavior(r=0.208***). Awareness of the gravity of the flu had a positive correlation to behavioral intention (r=0.270***), and behavioral intention was positively correlated to preventive behavior(r=0.516). Conclusions : The knowledge of the students about Influence A(H1N1) and their preventive behavior were analyzed in association with the spread of the flu, and there were no differences in actual preventive behavior though they were not the same in terms of behavioral intention. Therefore health education programs should be prepared to improve not only their knowledge but their attitude and preventive skills to boost their preventive behavior.
참고문헌 (11)
- 유봉현, "치과진료실에서의 신종인플루엔자 A(H1N1)의 감염예방 및 환자관리1" (2009), 치위협보 제147호
- 보건복지가족부, "신종인플루엔자 A(H1N1) 대유행의 위기 의사소통 전략 개발", pp.5~6 (2006), 질병관리본부
- 질병관리본부, "질병뉴스" (2010), Pandemic(H1N1)
- 질병관리본부, "주간보도자료", ~ (2010)
- 천병철, "신종 인플루엔자 대유행의 확산과 영향 모델링", 예방의학회지, 38(4), pp.379~385 (2005), 대한예방의학회
- "신종인플루엔자 A (H1N1) 개요", 질병관리본부[URL]
- 박신영, "아동의 신종인플루엔자 예방행동에 미치는 영향요인", 석사, pp.2009
- Martinello RA, "Correlation between healthcare worker' knowledge of influenza vaccine and vaccine receipt", Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol, 24(11), pp.845~847 (2003)
- Barnett DJ, "Assessment of local public health workers' willingness to respond to pandemic influenza through application of the extended parallel process model", Plos One Jul, 4(7), pp.6365~ (2009)
- 보건복지가족부, "신종인플루엔자 A(H1N1) 대유행의 위기 의사소통 전략 개발", pp.106~ (2006), 질병관리본부
- 보건복지가족부, "신종인플루엔자 A(H1N1) 대유행의 위기 의사소통 전략 개발", pp.106~134 (2006), 질병관리본부
