디지털 구강스캐너에 대한 치과위생사의 지식과 태도에 관한 인식도 분석
Analysis of dental hygienists’ perception of knowledge and attitude toward digital oral scanner
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: To investigate how dental hygienists who have never used a digital oral scanner perceive the impression acquisition and evidence needed for prosthesis planning by using a digital oral scanner. Methods: From July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, subjects from Daegu, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea, were selected. The purpose of the study was described to dental hygienists who had never used a digital intraoral scanner. Questionnaires were distributed to the students selected. Of the 137 questionnaires distributed, 93 were used in the analysis after excluding 44 completed questionnaires that had errors or missing answers. Results: Of the respondents, 33.7% (36/93) were aged ≥30 years, 68.8% graduated from a 3-year vocational college course, 33.5% were aged ≥33 years, and 61.3%. At present, our center has the largest number of clinics (92.5%). The difficulty of impression taking using the digital oral scanner significantly differed ( p <0.05) according to age and current occupation ( p <0.05). Impression taking using a digital oral scanner significantly affected the present workflow of dental hygienists and their interest in sharing information about future use of digital oral scanner ( p <0.01). Conclusions: If more routes are available to access digital intraoral scanners and more systems are developed for clinical use, the digital intraoral scanner could become digitized in the dental system; thereby, the existing impressions could be replaced with digitized impressions. With digital intraoral scanners, the expansion of the business of dental hygiene can be expected.
Abstract
Objectives: To investigate how dental hygienists who have never used a digital oral scanner perceive the impression acquisition and evidence needed for prosthesis planning by using a digital oral scanner. Methods: From July 1, 2017 to December 31, 2017, subjects from Daegu, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Korea, were selected. The purpose of the study was described to dental hygienists who had never used a digital intraoral scanner. Questionnaires were distributed to the students selected. Of the 137 questionnaires distributed, 93 were used in the analysis after excluding 44 completed questionnaires that had errors or missing answers. Results: Of the respondents, 33.7% (36/93) were aged ≥30 years, 68.8% graduated from a 3-year vocational college course, 33.5% were aged ≥33 years, and 61.3%. At present, our center has the largest number of clinics (92.5%). The difficulty of impression taking using the digital oral scanner significantly differed ( p <0.05) according to age and current occupation ( p <0.05). Impression taking using a digital oral scanner significantly affected the present workflow of dental hygienists and their interest in sharing information about future use of digital oral scanner ( p <0.01). Conclusions: If more routes are available to access digital intraoral scanners and more systems are developed for clinical use, the digital intraoral scanner could become digitized in the dental system; thereby, the existing impressions could be replaced with digitized impressions. With digital intraoral scanners, the expansion of the business of dental hygiene can be expected.
참고문헌 (24)
- "Seeking strategic countermeasures against future social change in the era of the 4th Industrial Revolution" (2016)[URL]
- Lee SJ, "Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: efficiency outcomes", Clin Oral Implants Res, 24(1), pp.111~115 (2013)[DOI]
- "Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques:evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes" (2014)[URL]
- Andrew P. Keating, "A comparison of plaster, digital and reconstructed study model accuracy", Journal of Orthodontics, 35(3), pp.191~201 (2014), Informa UK Limited[DOI]
- Heeje Lee, "Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 99(2), pp.107~113 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Walker MP, "Implant cast accuracy as a function of impression techniques and impression material viscosity", J Prosthetic Dent, 100(6), pp.473~ (2008)[DOI]
- Heeje Lee, "The accuracy of implant impressions: A systematic review", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 100(4), pp.285~291 (2008), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Alvin G. Wee, "Comparison of impression materials for direct multi-implant impressions", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(3), pp.323~331 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Mary E. Brosky, "Laser digitization of casts to determine the effect of tray selection and cast formation technique on accuracy", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 87(2), pp.204~209 (2002), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Jason Burns, "Accuracy of open tray implant impressions: An in vitro comparison of stock versus custom trays", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 89(3), pp.250~255 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Jeffrey A Ceyhan, "The effect of tray selection, viscosity of impression material, and sequence of pour on the accuracy of dies made from dual-arch impressions", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 90(2), pp.143~149 (2003), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Paolo Vigolo, "An evaluation of impression techniques for multiple internal connection implant prostheses", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 92(5), pp.470~476 (2004), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- Ala Omar Ali, "Accuracy of digital impressions achieved from five different digital impression system", J Prosthodontics, 5(5), pp.2~6 (2015)[DOI]
- Emir Yuzbasioglu, "Comparison of digital and conventional impression techniques: evaluation of patients’ perception, treatment comfort, effectiveness and clinical outcomes", BMC Oral Health, 14(1), pp.10~16 (2014), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- Daniel Wismeijer, "Patients' preferences when comparing analogue implant impressions using a polyether impression material versus digital impressions (Intraoral Scan) of dental implants", Clinical Oral Implants Research, 25(10), pp.1113~1118 (2014), Wiley[DOI]
- Kugel G, "Impression-taking: conventional methods remain steadfast as digital technology progresses", Compend Contin Educ Dent, 35, pp.202~203 (2014)
- 정상훈, "제품 사용 중 사용자의 감성 측정을 위한 자기-보고 질문지형 척도 개발", 감성과학, 10(3), pp.403~410 (2007), 한국감성과학회
- Hye-Ran Park, "Changes in views on digital intraoral scanners among dental hygienists after training in digital impression taking", BMC Oral Health, 15(1), pp.1~3 (2015), Springer Science and Business Media LLC[DOI]
- D. Herbst, "Evaluation of impression accuracy for osseointegrated implant supported superstructures", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 83(5), pp.555~561 (2000), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 최호식, "CAD", CAM의 치과적 응용, 2012, pp.50(3), 110~117[DOI]
- Takashi MIYAZAKI, "A review of dental CAD", CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28(1), 44~56[DOI]
- Sang J. Lee, "An evaluation of student and clinician perception of digital and conventional implant impressions", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 110(5), pp.420~423 (2013), Elsevier BV[DOI]
- 윤형인, "보철 치료 시 디지털 및 전통적 인상채득에 대한 환자 만족도 비교 연구", 대한치과보철학회지, 54(4), pp.379~386 (2016), 대한치과보철학회[DOI]
- Jisun Kim, "Comparison of experience curves between two 3-dimensional intraoral scanners", The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 116(2), pp.221~230 (2016), Elsevier BV[DOI]