본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

상완신경총 손상의 상부 신경간 손상 환자의 감각신경전도검사

Sensory Nerve Conduction Study of Upper Trunk Lesion in Brachial Plexopathy

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Localizing or evaluating lesions of upper trunk brachial plexopathy using conventional nerve conduction studies is not accurate. This study examined whether sensory nerve conduction studies are useful for detecting upper trunk brachial plexopathy. Methods: Sixty eight patients with upper trunk brachial plexopathy based on the intra-operative findings were selected among 162 cases of brachial plexopathy revealed by electrodiagnostic tests. All subjects were evaluated by extensive sensory nerve conduction studies including the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve, bilaterally. The following abnormalities were identified: lower amplitude or prolonged onset latency compared to the normal value or a decrease in amplitude more than 50% compared to the contralateral uninjured limb in the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP). This study analyzed the percentage of abnormal latency and amplitude in the SNAP of lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve and superficial radial nerve. Results: The percentage of cases who showed abnormal findings of the nerve conduction studies in the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve group was 88.2%, 69.2%, 48.5%, 44.4% and 66.2%, respectively. Compared to the uninjured limb, the abnormal findings of nerve conduction studies in the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve group was 92.6%, 88.4%, 64.7%, 55.5% and 82.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Various nerve conduction studies, including the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recording at 1st digit and superficial radial nerve, are needed to diagnose upper trunk brachial plexopathy. Because most brachial plexopathy is axon loss, a comparison of the injured and uninjured limb is recommended even if the amplitude of SNAP is within normal limits.

Abstract

Objectives: Localizing or evaluating lesions of upper trunk brachial plexopathy using conventional nerve conduction studies is not accurate. This study examined whether sensory nerve conduction studies are useful for detecting upper trunk brachial plexopathy. Methods: Sixty eight patients with upper trunk brachial plexopathy based on the intra-operative findings were selected among 162 cases of brachial plexopathy revealed by electrodiagnostic tests. All subjects were evaluated by extensive sensory nerve conduction studies including the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded at the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve, bilaterally. The following abnormalities were identified: lower amplitude or prolonged onset latency compared to the normal value or a decrease in amplitude more than 50% compared to the contralateral uninjured limb in the sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP). This study analyzed the percentage of abnormal latency and amplitude in the SNAP of lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve and superficial radial nerve. Results: The percentage of cases who showed abnormal findings of the nerve conduction studies in the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve group was 88.2%, 69.2%, 48.5%, 44.4% and 66.2%, respectively. Compared to the uninjured limb, the abnormal findings of nerve conduction studies in the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recorded from the 1st, 2nd and 3rd finger and superficial radial nerve group was 92.6%, 88.4%, 64.7%, 55.5% and 82.4%, respectively. Conclusion: Various nerve conduction studies, including the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, median nerve recording at 1st digit and superficial radial nerve, are needed to diagnose upper trunk brachial plexopathy. Because most brachial plexopathy is axon loss, a comparison of the injured and uninjured limb is recommended even if the amplitude of SNAP is within normal limits.

참고문헌 (13)

  1. 김상수, "상완신경총 및 말소 신경 손상의 합병증과 그 대책", 대한의학협회지, 10, pp.1080~1084 (1990)
  2. Dumitru D, "Brachial Plexopathies and Proximal Mononeuropathies. In Electrodiagnostic Medicine, 2nd ed", pp.777~836 (2002), Hanley & Belfus
  3. Wilbourn AJ, "The brachial plexus: Anatomy, pathophysiology and electrodiagnostic Medicine Course D: Brachial Plexus Assessment", CA, AAEM, 7~30 (1994)
  4. 이원일, "상완 신경총 손상의 근전도 소견", 대한 근전도 전기진단의학회지, 2, pp.277~283 (1990)
  5. 박은숙, "상완신경총 손상의 임상적 고찰", 대한재활의학회지, 12, pp.52~57 (1988)
  6. Aminoff MJ, "Relative utility of different electrophysioloic techniques in the evaluation of brachial plexopathies", Neurol, 38, pp.546~550 (1988)
  7. Burge P, "patterns of injury to the terminal branches of injury to the terminal branches of the brachial plexus", J Bone and Joint Surg, 67, pp.630~634 (1985)
  8. Ferrante MA, "Electrodiagnostic approach to the patient with suspected brachial plexopathy", Neurol Clin, 20, pp.423~450 (2002)
  9. 한태륜, "상완신경총 손상의 근전도 소견", 대한재활의학회지, 13, pp.214~210 (1989)
  10. 주민철, "상완신경총 신경절전 손상의 전기진단검사와 자기공명영상의 유용성", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 29(6), pp.608~613 (2005), 대한재활의학회
  11. 한태륜, "상완신경총 손상의 근전도적검사 소견과 방사선적검사 소견의 비교", 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지, 3, pp.69~73 (2001)
  12. Wilbourn AJ, "AAEM minimonography 32: the electrodiagnostic examination in patient with radiculopathies", Muscle Nerve, 21, pp.1612~1631 (1998)
  13. Ferrante MA, "The utility of various sensory conduction responses in assessing brachial plexopathies", Muscle Nerve, 18, pp.879~889 (1995)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)