본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

제 1천수 신경근병증의 진단에서 H반사 면적의 유용성

Diagnostic Value of H Reflex Area in S1 Radiculopathy

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic value of area of H reflex in patients diagnosed with S1 radiculopathy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of subjects who underwent EMG study including H reflex between January 2004 and May 2010. Of a total of 2612 subjects, only patients with S1 root involvement confirmed during surgery were recruited. At the end, 47 patients were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 patients, 28 patients presented no response on the affected side and 7 showed no response bilaterally. Ten subjects with bilateral evoked potential were analyzed to calculate H latency, H amplitude, H area and H to M area ratio. Two did not show response on the unaffected side. In 10 patients with bilateral evoked potential, only H area showed significant difference between affected and unaffected sides. Using the H area as a parameter, 37 patients (28 - no response, 9 - H area smaller than that of the unaffected side) or 35 patients (28 - no response, 7 - H area less than 50% of the unaffected side) met the criteria. Sensitivities were 78.7% and 74.5%, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that area of H reflex may increase the sensitivity in diagnosis of S1 radiculopathy.

Abstract

Objectives: To determine the diagnostic value of area of H reflex in patients diagnosed with S1 radiculopathy. Methods: We reviewed medical records of subjects who underwent EMG study including H reflex between January 2004 and May 2010. Of a total of 2612 subjects, only patients with S1 root involvement confirmed during surgery were recruited. At the end, 47 patients were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 patients, 28 patients presented no response on the affected side and 7 showed no response bilaterally. Ten subjects with bilateral evoked potential were analyzed to calculate H latency, H amplitude, H area and H to M area ratio. Two did not show response on the unaffected side. In 10 patients with bilateral evoked potential, only H area showed significant difference between affected and unaffected sides. Using the H area as a parameter, 37 patients (28 - no response, 9 - H area smaller than that of the unaffected side) or 35 patients (28 - no response, 7 - H area less than 50% of the unaffected side) met the criteria. Sensitivities were 78.7% and 74.5%, respectively. Conclusion: We concluded that area of H reflex may increase the sensitivity in diagnosis of S1 radiculopathy.

참고문헌 (17)

  1. 한태륜, "H반사 표준화에 관한 연구", 대한재활의학회지, 15, pp.33~40 (1991)
  2. 한태륜, "H반사의 새로운 진단 기준에관한 연구", 대한재활의학회지, 17, pp.473~482 (1993)
  3. Braddom RI, "Standardization of H reflex and diagnostic use in Sl radiculopathy", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 55, pp.161~166 (1974)
  4. Nishida T, "H reflex in S-1 radiculopathy: latency versus amplitude controversy revisited", Muscle Nerve, 19, pp.915~917 (1996)
  5. 성덕현, "제 1천추 신경근병변에서의 H반사의 진단 효용성", 대한근전도·전기진단의학회지, 1, pp.49~54 (1999)
  6. Aiello I, "The diagnostic value of H-index in S1 root compression", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 44, pp.171~172 (1981)
  7. 신정빈, "제 1천수 신경근 병변의 진단에서 가자미근 H파에 관한 고찰", 대한재활의학회지, 20, pp.638~643 (1996)
  8. Magladery JW, "Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers", Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp, 86, pp.265~290 (1950)
  9. Daelmans HE, "Normal H reflexes and denervation in the low leg musculature: comparison of EMG with computed tomography, myelography and operation in patients with radiculopathy", Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 27, pp.109~114 (1987)
  10. Williams LR, "Reliability of individual differences for H-reflex recordings", Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 32, pp.43~49 (1992)
  11. Aiello I, "Electrophysiological findings in patients with lumbar disc prolapse", Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 24, pp.313~320 (1984)
  12. Dhand UK, "Patterns of H-reflex abnormality in patients with low back pain", Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol, 31, pp.209~213 (1991)
  13. Fisher MA, "Clinical and electrophysiological appraisal of the significance of radicular injury in back pain", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 41, pp.303~306 (1978)
  14. Jankus WR, "Normal limits of side-to-side H-reflex amplitude variability", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 75, pp.3~7 (1994)
  15. 김은이, "요천추 신경근 병변에서의 H반사 검사의 진단적 가치", 대한재활의학회지, 14, pp.219~226 (1990)
  16. Granger CV, "Nerve root conduction studies during lumbar disc surgery", J Neurosurg, 28, pp.439~444 (1968)
  17. Wilbourn AJ, "AAEE minimonograph #32: the electrophysiologic examination in patients with radiculopathies", Muscle Nerve, 11, pp.1099~1114 (1988)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)