본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

공정거래법령상 기업집단 계열회사의 판단기준

Analysis and interpretation of issues under the Fair Trade Act on the scope of business groups

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Under the current legal system, the criteria for determining the scope of business groups are presented through Article 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the Fair Trade Act. However, since this regulation contains a number of uncertain concepts and abstract requirements, confusion in interpretation and enforcement issues have been raised. In determining the scope of a business group, both "under-execution" that overlooks the impact of the business group's economic power on the general economy or "over-execution" caused by including situations that are not directly related to the concentration of economic power. In addition, the basic principle of regulation of pursuing optimal enforcement and minimizing enforcement errors should be observed, noting that a new gap between norms and reality may occur within the current regulations, which have been closely supplemented with gaps and deficiencies. Focusing on Article 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the current Fair Trade Act, this article analyzes the issues of criteria for determining the categories or affiliates of large business groups, and develops an interpretation theory of ambiguous parts.

Abstract

Under the current legal system, the criteria for determining the scope of business groups are presented through Article 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the Fair Trade Act. However, since this regulation contains a number of uncertain concepts and abstract requirements, confusion in interpretation and enforcement issues have been raised. In determining the scope of a business group, both "under-execution" that overlooks the impact of the business group's economic power on the general economy or "over-execution" caused by including situations that are not directly related to the concentration of economic power. In addition, the basic principle of regulation of pursuing optimal enforcement and minimizing enforcement errors should be observed, noting that a new gap between norms and reality may occur within the current regulations, which have been closely supplemented with gaps and deficiencies. Focusing on Article 4 of the Enforcement Decree of the current Fair Trade Act, this article analyzes the issues of criteria for determining the categories or affiliates of large business groups, and develops an interpretation theory of ambiguous parts.

참고문헌 (9)

  1. 강상엽, "동일인 지정제도와 자기주식의 취득, 보유 및 처분 : 정성적 기준을 중심으로", 경쟁법연구, 44, pp.224~256 (2021), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
  2. 강상엽, "동일인 지정제도: 정량적 기준과 정성적 기준의 비판적 검토", 경제법연구, 20(2), pp.201~234 (2021), 한국경제법학회[DOI]
  3. 공정거래위원회, "2021년판 공정거래백서" (2021)
  4. 국회의원 이용우 의원실, "미래에셋 여수경도 개발 GRD는 위장계열사 공정위 SPC를이용한 금융계열사 우회 지원 막아야", 보도자료, ~ (2021)
  5. 권오승, "독점규제법 - 이론과 실무" (2022), 법문사
  6. 김미리, "해외 계열회사의 공정거래법상 취급 및 규제동향 등에 대한 소개", BFL, (78), pp.94~106 (2016), 서울대학교 금융법센터
  7. 서 정, "기업집단의 동일인 확정에 관한 검토", 경쟁법연구, 43, pp.233~259 (2021), 한국경쟁법학회[DOI]
  8. 신현윤, "대기업집단 규제론" (2021), 법문사
  9. 전찬수, "‘동일인’ 관련 제도의 개선방안에 대한 연구", 법과 기업 연구, 12(1), pp.67~97 (2022), 법학연구소[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)