중국의 한반도 군사개입 전략에 대한 역사적 고찰
A Historical Research on the Korean Peninsula Military Intervention Strategy of the People's Republic of China
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This thesis seeks to predict the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s military intervention and provide a strategic direction for the response against chinese military through the analysis of three examples of war, such as the Silla-Tang Military Alliance, the Joseon-Ming Combined Defense Strategy, and Sino-NK Mutual Defense Treaty. According to the military history of chinese intervention on the Korean Peninsula, China's basic strategy was to prevent Korea from having independent capability to confront China. Also, China attempted to interdict other maritime powers from utilizing Korean Peninsula as a bridgehead to move forward mainland China. It is obvious that China regarded Weonsan-Daedong River Line as a buffer zone to the security of mainland China. Through historic examples of war, the common decisive factors of PRC's military intervention on the Korean Peninsula are applied by three types: military alliance & request for backup, national security & national interest, securing the initiatives among neighboring nations. The PRC military's main task relating to Korean peninsula is to foster a secure environment around the peninsula. The QRF(Quick Reaction Forces) of PRC will be immediately put into military action in case of any emergent situations. The forces will be a significant threat to Korea. Therefore, the directions for military readiness of the Republic of Korea (ROK) military needs to develop various situations and make plans for the threat of new war in the wartime Korean Peninsula defense plan. The ROK military also needs to further develop the ROK-US Combined Operations Plan to implement a ROK-US military response scheme. It is vital for the ROK national security that the ROK military prepares to properly react to chinese strategy on the Korean Peninsula by utilizing Sino-ROK military exchange programs and developing military doctrine in preparation of PRC military's modernization, and sending officers to china for the military education. The ROK military has to become robust forces capable of overcoming any threats in order to support the 'Strategic Companion Relationship' between the ROK and PRC, and uphold the execution of 'Grand Bargain' on the NK's nuclear issue. For this, Our forces have to seize the initiatives in the battlefield by maximizing current strategy for the national defense, possessing flexibility and jointness. They also have to guarantee its national security through the Quick Reaction Strategy if it happens an emergent situation or war breaks out.
Abstract
This thesis seeks to predict the People's Republic of China (PRC)'s military intervention and provide a strategic direction for the response against chinese military through the analysis of three examples of war, such as the Silla-Tang Military Alliance, the Joseon-Ming Combined Defense Strategy, and Sino-NK Mutual Defense Treaty. According to the military history of chinese intervention on the Korean Peninsula, China's basic strategy was to prevent Korea from having independent capability to confront China. Also, China attempted to interdict other maritime powers from utilizing Korean Peninsula as a bridgehead to move forward mainland China. It is obvious that China regarded Weonsan-Daedong River Line as a buffer zone to the security of mainland China. Through historic examples of war, the common decisive factors of PRC's military intervention on the Korean Peninsula are applied by three types: military alliance & request for backup, national security & national interest, securing the initiatives among neighboring nations. The PRC military's main task relating to Korean peninsula is to foster a secure environment around the peninsula. The QRF(Quick Reaction Forces) of PRC will be immediately put into military action in case of any emergent situations. The forces will be a significant threat to Korea. Therefore, the directions for military readiness of the Republic of Korea (ROK) military needs to develop various situations and make plans for the threat of new war in the wartime Korean Peninsula defense plan. The ROK military also needs to further develop the ROK-US Combined Operations Plan to implement a ROK-US military response scheme. It is vital for the ROK national security that the ROK military prepares to properly react to chinese strategy on the Korean Peninsula by utilizing Sino-ROK military exchange programs and developing military doctrine in preparation of PRC military's modernization, and sending officers to china for the military education. The ROK military has to become robust forces capable of overcoming any threats in order to support the 'Strategic Companion Relationship' between the ROK and PRC, and uphold the execution of 'Grand Bargain' on the NK's nuclear issue. For this, Our forces have to seize the initiatives in the battlefield by maximizing current strategy for the national defense, possessing flexibility and jointness. They also have to guarantee its national security through the Quick Reaction Strategy if it happens an emergent situation or war breaks out.
참고문헌 (49)
- "중앙일보", ~
- 박승준, "박승준의 중국 바로보기,'월간조선' 2010. 6. 21", ~ (2010)
- 서상문, "毛澤東과 6ㆍ25전쟁" (2006), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- "국방일보", ~
- 유현정, "북-중 정상회담과 중국의 선택", 정세와 정책, (170), pp.7~ (2010), 세종연구소
- 박창희, "북한급변사태와 중국의 군사개입 전망", 국가전략, 16(1), pp.33~60 (2010), 세종연구소
- 국방부, "2008국방백서" (2009), 유진피앤피
- 육군대학, "중국지상군 전술", pp.18~ (2008), 육군 인쇄창
- 박창희, "중국정세 세미나 자료", pp.4~6 (2009), 국방정보본부
- 김청중, "中, 우주에도 장성(長城) 구축한다, '세계일보' 2009. 11. 4", ~ (2009)
- Paul H. B. Godwin, "From Continent to Periphery: PLA Doctrine, Strategy and Capabilities Towards 2000. in: China's Military in Transition", pp.205~206 (1997), Clarendon
- 육군 교육사령부, "'週刊 해외 군사자료정보', 09-42호(2009. 11. 2)", ~ (2009)
- 정보사령부, "中共年報 2008 제3편 군사", pp.38~ (2009), 정보사령부 발간대
- "三國史記", ~
- 박한제, "七世紀 隋唐 兩朝의 韓半島進出 經緯에 대한 考察", 東洋史學硏究, 43, pp.37~39 (1993)
- 이만열, "統一外交의 成立-金春秋. in: 講座 三國時代史", pp.228~ (1976), 지식산업사
- 서인한, "한국고대 군사전략", pp.285~288 (2005), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- 육군사관학교 군사학처, "전쟁연구", pp.123~136 (1991), 한원
- "선조실록", ~
- 장학근, "조선시대 군사전략" (2006), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- "資治通鑑, 券199 唐紀15 貞觀 22年 4月", ~
- 국방부, "'6ㆍ25전쟁사', 제1권 전쟁의 배경과 원인", pp.23~26 (2004), 국방부 군사편찬연구소
- 中國人民抗美援朝總會宣傳部, "偉大的抗美援朝運動", pp.4~ (1954), 人民出版社
- 沈志華, "중국의 한국전쟁 참전결정에 대한 평가. in: 한국전쟁과 중국", pp.273~ (2001), 백산서당
- 한국전략문제연구소, "中共軍의 韓國戰爭史" (1991), 세경사
- 沈志華, "毛澤東·欺大林與朝鮮戰爭", pp.148~150 (2003), 廣東人民出版社
- Liu Zhiqing, "Kang-Mei Yuan-Chao shiqi de Zhong-Su Guanxi", She-Ke Zhongheng, (1), pp.34~ (1991)
- David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅴ)", 전략연구, (39) (2007)
- 박두복, "중국의 한국전쟁 개입원인. in: 한국전쟁과 중국", pp.171~ (2001), 백산서당
- Cho Soon-Sung, "Korea in World Politics, 1940~1950", pp.5~ (1967), University of California
- 楊鳳安, "駕馭朝鮮戰爭的人", pp.71~ (1993), 中共中央黨校出版社
- 吳泠西, "爲什摩我國人民對於美國擴大侵朝戰爭不能置之不理", 時事手冊, 2, pp.3~ (1950)
- 人民日報, "中國各民主黨楊派鳳關於抗美援朝保家衛國的聯合宣言. in: 人民日報(1950年 11月 5日)", ~ (1950)
- David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅰ)", 전략연구, (35), pp.172~174 (2005)
- David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅷ)", 전략연구, (42), pp.224~247 (2008)
- 徐祿友, "砲兵戰術基础", pp.121~122 (2000), 國防科技大學出版社
- 황병무, "新中國軍事論", pp.112~ (1995), 법문사
- "解放軍報, 1988. 12. 1", ~ (1988)
- 徐澤榮, "'中國介入朝鮮戰爭之始末與目標' 分章摘要", 傳記文學, 77(4), pp.47~ (2000)
- 이종석, "북한-중국관계 1945~2000", pp.129~ (2000), 중심
- David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅲ)", 전략연구, (37), pp.195~ (2006)
- Goncharov, "Uncertain partners", 140~141
- 沈志華, "1950년 중소조약의 체계: 소망과 결과", 中共黨史硏究, 2, 3 (1998)
- David Tsui, "중공군의 한국전쟁 참전(Ⅱ)", 전략연구, (36), pp.162~164 (2006)
- 대한민국 외무부, "한국전 문서요약(1950. 1. 8). in: 한국전쟁관련 소련 극비외교문서(1949.1〜1953.8)", pp.19~ (1994), 대한민국 외무부
- 이완범, "중국인민지원군의 한국전쟁 참전 결정. in: 한국전쟁과 중국", pp.212~214 (2001), 백산서당
- Qi Dexue, "Chaoxian Zhanzheng juece neimu", pp.31~ (1991), Liaoning Daxue Chubanshe
- "조선일보", ~
- 한석희, "후진타오 시대의 중국대외관계", pp.151~ (2007), 폴리테이아
