한국의 계엄사에 관한 연구
A Study on Martial Law History in Korea
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The focus of this thesis is the Material Law History in Korea. Material Law a nation’s emergency competence has worked out as a means in history to maintain national peace and social order. Such function and values are still valid nowadays, and the basic aim of the law is not defaced. However, there is also a problem that the material law in force now does not reflect the current times. It has been more than 20 years since the law was revised. Since the realistic situation has changed so much all the while, it is necessary to revise the law reflecting the real world, wether the system is used frequently or not. Further, articles concerning the material law have many problems within, in the relationship with basic human rights. Constitution in Force now states the material law in article 77. Material law is stated with two categories of extraordinary and precautionary material law. The material law in force now is stated based on constitution. It has been revised 4 times. But the law in force now still has many problems. First, the condition to proclaim the material law is not certain. Second, the president must get consent from the assembly after the proclamation of material law, but it's more effective to get prior consent to control material law. Lastly, the law has possibility to impose excessive restriction on people's fundamental rights. Therefore, the law has to be revised to resolve those problems.
Abstract
The focus of this thesis is the Material Law History in Korea. Material Law a nation’s emergency competence has worked out as a means in history to maintain national peace and social order. Such function and values are still valid nowadays, and the basic aim of the law is not defaced. However, there is also a problem that the material law in force now does not reflect the current times. It has been more than 20 years since the law was revised. Since the realistic situation has changed so much all the while, it is necessary to revise the law reflecting the real world, wether the system is used frequently or not. Further, articles concerning the material law have many problems within, in the relationship with basic human rights. Constitution in Force now states the material law in article 77. Material law is stated with two categories of extraordinary and precautionary material law. The material law in force now is stated based on constitution. It has been revised 4 times. But the law in force now still has many problems. First, the condition to proclaim the material law is not certain. Second, the president must get consent from the assembly after the proclamation of material law, but it's more effective to get prior consent to control material law. Lastly, the law has possibility to impose excessive restriction on people's fundamental rights. Therefore, the law has to be revised to resolve those problems.
참고문헌 (20)
- 김기범, "영국에 있어서의 국가긴급권", 헌법연구, 2, pp.69~ (1972)
- 김도창, "국가긴급권론", pp.46~ (1972), 청운사
- 김도창, "전게서", 72~
- 박일경, "미국대통령의 국가긴급권", 헌법연구, 2, pp.46~ (1972)
- 배준상, "Bonn기본법에 있어서의 비상사태에 관한 헌법적 규제 in: 공법의 제문제(문홍주박사회갑기념)", pp.345~ (1978)
- 김영수, "프랑스 제5공화국헌법의 역사적 기초; 공법의 제문제(해암문홍주박사회갑기념논문집)", pp.101~ (1978)
- 김기범, "불란서에 있어서의 국가긴급권", 성곡논총, 1, pp.27~ (1970)
- 오병헌, "계엄법의 기원과 문제점", 사법행정, 1, pp.61~ (1994)
- "계엄법에 관한 문제점 고찰", 안암법학, 12, pp.31~
- 김도창, "계엄", 박사, pp.1968
- 김창록, "4·3 계엄령을 통해 본 일제법령의 효력", 법학연구, 39(1), pp.478~
- 유진오, "신고 헌법해의", 289~ (1953)
- "대판 1955. 3. 4. 1954형상101; 1960. 9. 15. 1958민상492; 1956. 3. 30. 4288행상21 등", ~
- 권영성, "헌법학원론", pp.989~ (2005)
- 이상철, "戒嚴法에 關한 問題點 考察", 安岩法學, (12), 세창출판사
- 김도창, "계엄에 관한 약간의 고찰", 서울대학교 법학, 6(2), pp.1,38~ (1964)
- "독립신문, 1948년 12월 1일자", ~ (1948)
- 최대권, "6·25전쟁의 법적 조명", 6·25 50주년 학술심포지움 논문집, pp.4~ (2000), 서울대학교 법학연구소
- 박명림, "한국 1950 전쟁과 평화", pp.160~161, 나남출판
- "국방부정훈국 전사편찬회", 24~25 (1951)
