코소보전쟁의 동인 분석:랑부예(Rambouillet) 평화회담
An Analysis on the Rambouillet Accordsas a Causes of Kosovo Warfare
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The point of departure of this study involves the Kosovo crisis in the late 1990s in which the United States intervened with military forces and the international political environment surrounding the significant event in the post Cold War era. The United States carried out military intervention by placing regional security organization, NATO(North Atlantic Treaty Organization) at the head as crisis of humanitarian disaster occurred at Kosovo in former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia(FRY) due to internal conflict. The purpose of this study is to analysis on the causes of United States/ NATO military intervention in Kosovo. Serbia army killed innocent civilians and generated numerous refugees in the process of suppressing the armed struggle of Kosovo Liberation Army(KLA). The United States and NATO made a threat that they would bomb attack Serbia in case that it would not accept provisional political solution plan for contact group in peace conference that had been hosted in Rambouillet, France in February and the plan to perform peace-keeping soldiers. Nevertheless, Serbia Assembly rejected the suggestions unanimously, and it led to the air attack the United States and NATO made to Yugoslavia. The Rambouillet Accords were the standard which decides the future of Kosovo, and was the momentum which brings about a NATO military intervention, kept the major implication international politic.
Abstract
The point of departure of this study involves the Kosovo crisis in the late 1990s in which the United States intervened with military forces and the international political environment surrounding the significant event in the post Cold War era. The United States carried out military intervention by placing regional security organization, NATO(North Atlantic Treaty Organization) at the head as crisis of humanitarian disaster occurred at Kosovo in former Federal Republic of Yugoslavia(FRY) due to internal conflict. The purpose of this study is to analysis on the causes of United States/ NATO military intervention in Kosovo. Serbia army killed innocent civilians and generated numerous refugees in the process of suppressing the armed struggle of Kosovo Liberation Army(KLA). The United States and NATO made a threat that they would bomb attack Serbia in case that it would not accept provisional political solution plan for contact group in peace conference that had been hosted in Rambouillet, France in February and the plan to perform peace-keeping soldiers. Nevertheless, Serbia Assembly rejected the suggestions unanimously, and it led to the air attack the United States and NATO made to Yugoslavia. The Rambouillet Accords were the standard which decides the future of Kosovo, and was the momentum which brings about a NATO military intervention, kept the major implication international politic.
참고문헌 (26)
- "UN Security Council Resolution 1160", Adopted by the Security Council at its 3868th meeting (1998)
- Marc Weller, "The Crisis in Kosovo 1989- 1999:From the Dissolution of Yugoslavia to Rambouillet and the Outbreak of Hostilities", pp.188~189 (1999), Documents & Analysis Publishing Ltd.
- 김경숙, "코소보전쟁의 평가 및 시사", 인문사회과학연구, 14, pp.4~ (1999), 공주대학교
- Ivo H. Daalder, "Winning Ugly:NATO's War to Save Kosovo" (2000), Brookings Institute Press
- 손규석, "코소보 분쟁의 발생요인과 해결과정", 분쟁해결연구, 15(1)통권 : 8, pp.123~ (2007), 단국대학교 분쟁해결연구센터
- 이삼성, "세계와 미국:20세기의 반성과 21세기의 전망" (2001), 한길사
- Sam Seibert, "Long Odds in Paris", Newsweek, (366) (1999)
- Understanding the Rambouillet Accords, "Fact Sheet released by the Bureau of European Affairs" (1999), U.S. Department of State
- "｢코소보 평화회담 참가｣, 『조선일보』, 1999년 2월 5일자", ~
- O.N. Mehrotra, "The Kosovo Crisis: Perception and Problem", Strategic Analysis, A Monthly Journal of the IDSA, 22(7), pp.1~ (1998)
- Noam Chomsky, "Kosovo Peace Accord" (1999)
- 이삼성, "미국외교와 ‘인도적’ 군사개입:코소보의 인식을 중심으로 in: 코소보사태와 안보외교", 한국정치학회 연례학술회의 (1999)
- Jane Perlez, "Kosovo Peace Plan Takes Shape as Russia Prods Serbs on Troops" (1999), The New York Times
- 로빈 블랙번, "코소보:나토 팽창정책 in: 전쟁이 끝난 후:코소보를 둘러싼 나토의 발칸전쟁이 남긴 것들" (2000), 이후
- James Phillips, "Consolidating Victory in Afganistan", eritage Foundation Backgrounder, (754) (1990)
- , Keesing Record of World Events, 37(10), pp.38513~ (1991)
- 레지 드브레, "공화국 대통령에게 보내는 한 여행객의 공개서한"
- Michael E. O'Hanlon, "Dying for Kosovo", pp.A17~ (1988), Washington Times
- 김열수, "탈냉전 후 유엔 안보리의 위상변화:군사력 사용을 중심으로", 국제정치논총, 48(1), pp.349~374 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
- 이수형, "북대서양조약기구(NATO)와 국제연합(UN) 안보리와의 역학관계: 탈냉전 이후 나토의 집단안보 역할을 중심으로", 국가전략, 14(3), pp.89~112 (2008), 세종연구소
- 고병국, "코소보 전쟁 관련 자료", 민족연구, (3), pp.18~19 (1991), 한국민족연구원
- Susan Woodward, "Balkan Tragedy:Chaos and Dissolution after the Cold War", pp.330~ (1995), Brookings Institution Press
- Warren Zimmermann, "Origins of a Catastrophe:Yugoslavia and Its Destroyers", pp.130~ (1996), Time Books
- International Crisis Group, "Kosovo Spring:The International Crisis Group Guide to Kosovo", pp.110~ (1998)
- Barry Posen, "The War for Kosovo", International Security, 24, pp.34~ (2000)
- Joseph S. Nye Jr., "Redefining the National Interest", Foreign Affairs, 78, pp.34~ (1999)