한국판 레토릭 지수(RHETSEN-K)의 개발과 타당화
The Korean Version of Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale (RHETSEN-K): Development and Validation
0
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: We aimed to develop a Korean version of Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale by Eadie and Powell (1991). The scale is expected to help communication students and educators by letting them to know what their communication types are and how they can be improved. Methods: We carried out exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the scale and based on the results we categorized communication types of the respondents. Then, we investigated the correlations among the factors of RHETSEN-K, Communication Competency Scale, and Big 5 to affirm convergent and discriminant validity of RHETSEN-K. Results: The results of factor analysis suggested the three factors, rhetorical sensitives, noble selves, and rhetorical reflectors as in the original study, but the factor structure was slightly different. The internal consistency of the three factors were all above .7. The results of convergent and discriminant validity showed that rhetorical sensitives were positively correlated with information gathering, taking initiatives, understanding others'perspectives, extroversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience. Noble selves showed a negative correlation with overcoming stereotypes and positive correlations with taking initiatives, extroversion, and openness to experience. Rhetorical reflectors showed negative correlations with self disclosure, taking initiatives, extroversion,and openness to experience. Conclusion: These results support that the original concepts of the three types are mostly kept in Korea. Finally, the relationship between rhetorical sensitivity and the East-West cultural differences and educational implications of RHETSEN-K are discussed
Abstract
Purpose: We aimed to develop a Korean version of Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale by Eadie and Powell (1991). The scale is expected to help communication students and educators by letting them to know what their communication types are and how they can be improved. Methods: We carried out exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to examine the factor structure of the scale and based on the results we categorized communication types of the respondents. Then, we investigated the correlations among the factors of RHETSEN-K, Communication Competency Scale, and Big 5 to affirm convergent and discriminant validity of RHETSEN-K. Results: The results of factor analysis suggested the three factors, rhetorical sensitives, noble selves, and rhetorical reflectors as in the original study, but the factor structure was slightly different. The internal consistency of the three factors were all above .7. The results of convergent and discriminant validity showed that rhetorical sensitives were positively correlated with information gathering, taking initiatives, understanding others'perspectives, extroversion, agreeableness, and openness to experience. Noble selves showed a negative correlation with overcoming stereotypes and positive correlations with taking initiatives, extroversion, and openness to experience. Rhetorical reflectors showed negative correlations with self disclosure, taking initiatives, extroversion,and openness to experience. Conclusion: These results support that the original concepts of the three types are mostly kept in Korea. Finally, the relationship between rhetorical sensitivity and the East-West cultural differences and educational implications of RHETSEN-K are discussed
참고문헌 (34)
- 권대식, "직종별 기초직업능력의 중요도 분석", 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집, pp.446~447 (2006)
- 김장이, "한국인의 의사소통", 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 심포지엄: 한국형 감수성훈련 모델의 개발, pp.106~109 (2006)
- 馬正健, "어머니의 促進的 意思疏通과 자녀의 人性 特性과의 關係", 박사, 교육학, pp.1988
- 박영화, "부부의 자존감, 의사소통 방식, 및 갈등대처행동과 결혼만족도간의 관계: 자기효과와 상대방효과", 한국심리학회지: 사회및성격, 19(1), pp.71~100 (2005), 한국사회및성격심리학회
- 박진채, "가족의사소통, 합리적 진로의사결정, 진로결정효능감의 관계모형 검증", 한국심리학회지: 학교, 11, pp.37~52 (2004)
- 백경미, "부모-자녀 간 의사소통과자기효능감이 학교 적응에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회 2008년도 연차학술발표대회 논문집, pp.666~667 (2008)
- 서은국, "한국형 Big 5 축약검사", 미출판논문, ~ (2005)
- 안선경, "개인의 성격과 의사소통 능력 간의 관계", 한국언론학보, 48(2), pp.321~345 (2004), 한국언론학회
- 생애능력 측정도구 개발연구: 의사소통능력, 문제해결능력, 자기주도적 학습능력을 중심으로, "이석재", 한국교육개발원연구보고서, ~, pp.연구보고 RR 2003-15-3 (2003)
- 이영훈, "레토릭 지수(Rhetorical Sensitivity Scale) ― 커뮤니케이션 능력 측정 가능성의 탐구 ―", 수사학, (7), pp.99~118 (2007), 한국수사학회
- Jung Lee, "Adolescent girls’eating disordered behaviors and family communication over a four-time period: Latent Growth Modeling (LGM) analysis", 한국심리학회지: 건강, 12(3), pp.467~492 (2007), 한국건강심리학회
- 이지은, "기혼여성의 마음챙김과 부부의사소통패턴, 결혼만족도의 관련성", 한국심리학회지:여성, 12(3), pp.331~345 (2007), 한국여성심리학회
- 장휘숙, "애착과 의사소통 능력 및 결혼관계 만족의 관계", 한국심리학회지: 발달, 20(4), pp.17~32 (2007), 한국심리학회 산하 한국발달심리학회
- 정혜진, "어머니와 아동의 성격특성이 아동의 부모-자녀 의사소통 및 또래 관계에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회 연차학술발표대회 논문집, pp.98~99 (2008)
- 탁진국, "심리검사: 개발과 평가방법의 이해" (2007), 학지사
- An exploratory study of the relationship between rhetorical sensitivity, leadership effectiveness, and rank in a military organization. Research report, "Cahn DD", Research report, ~ (1980)
- Carlson RE, "The Nurse's Guide to Better Communication" (1984), Scott, Foresman and Company
- Dell S., "A communication-based theory of the glass ceiling: Rhetorical sensitivity and upward mobility within the technical organization", IEEE Trans Prof Commun, 35, pp.230~235 (1992)
- Dowling S, "Cognitive complexity, rhetorical sensitivity: Contributing factors in clinical skill?", J Commun Dis, 17, pp.9~17 (1984)
- Eadie WF, "RHETSEN2: A new measure of rhetorical sensitivity" (1991), Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Western States Communication Association
- Edwards R, "You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication", Sex Roles, 50, pp.491~504 (2004)
- Gotcher JM, "Perceptions and uses of electronic mail: A function of rhetorical style", Soc Sci Comput Rev, 15, pp.145~158 (1997)
- "Rhetorical sensitivity: A key concept for creating successful online instruction. TCC-L On-Line Conference; 1997"[URL]
- Hart RP, "Rhetorical sensitivity and social interaction", Speech Monographs, 39, pp.75~91 (1972)
- Hart RP, "Attitudes toward communication and the assessment of rhetorical sensitivity", Communication Monographs, 47, pp.1~22 (1980)
- House A, "Androgyny and rhetorical sensitivity: The connection of gender and communicator style", Communication Reports, 11, pp.11~20 (1998)
- Knutson TJ, "Development of an instrument to measure Thai rhetorical sensitivity", Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association (2002)
- Knutson TJ, "A cross-cultural comparison of Thai and US American rhetorical sensitivity: Implications for intercultural communication effectiveness", International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 27, pp.63~78 (2003)
- Maquire P, "Key communication skills and how to acquire them", BMJ, 325, pp.697~700 (2002)
- Richmond VP, "An investigation of self-perceived communication competence and personality orientations", Communication Research Reports, 6, pp.28~36 (1989)
- Rybacki DJ, "Sensitivity among the members of decision making groups", 박사, pp.1983
- Stewart M, "Effective physician-patient communication and health outcomes: a review", CMAJ, 152, pp.1423~1433 (1995)
- Teutsch C, "Patient-doctor communication", Med Clin North Am, 87, pp.1115~1145 (2003)
- Ting-Toomey S., "Rhetorical sensitivity style in three cultures: France, Japan, and the United States", Communication Studies, 39, pp.28~36 (1988)