화자의 성별과 위치가 건청 성인 및 노인군의 문장인지에 미치는 영향
Effects of talker gender and spatial location on sentence recognition for young and old listeners with normal hearing
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to determine the effect of gender and spatial difference between two talkers on the sentence recognition of young and old listeners with normal hearing. Gender difference was manipulated using gender-matched (i.e., male-male or female-female) or gender-mismatched (i.e., male-female or female-male) sentence pairs. Four spatial separation conditions (-45/45°, -90/90°, -135/135°,180° azimuth) were presented through eight directional speakers. The ability of sentence recognition was identified by key word scoring. Overall, young normal-hearing (YNH) listeners performed better than old normal-hearing listeners (ONH) in all conditions. The gender mismatch between two talkers was beneficial to recognize closed-set sentences by creating the release from informational masking, more for the ONH group compared to the YNH group. The effect of spatial separation was not significant in both groups. Year of education for ONH listeners significantly affected their two-talker speech recognition. Results of individual differences in ONH listeners suggest that the ability to use acoustic cues given by gender and spatial difference between two competing talkers appears to be related to their cognitive ability.
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the effect of gender and spatial difference between two talkers on the sentence recognition of young and old listeners with normal hearing. Gender difference was manipulated using gender-matched (i.e., male-male or female-female) or gender-mismatched (i.e., male-female or female-male) sentence pairs. Four spatial separation conditions (-45/45°, -90/90°, -135/135°,180° azimuth) were presented through eight directional speakers. The ability of sentence recognition was identified by key word scoring. Overall, young normal-hearing (YNH) listeners performed better than old normal-hearing listeners (ONH) in all conditions. The gender mismatch between two talkers was beneficial to recognize closed-set sentences by creating the release from informational masking, more for the ONH group compared to the YNH group. The effect of spatial separation was not significant in both groups. Year of education for ONH listeners significantly affected their two-talker speech recognition. Results of individual differences in ONH listeners suggest that the ability to use acoustic cues given by gender and spatial difference between two competing talkers appears to be related to their cognitive ability.
참고문헌 (45)
- Allen K, "Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts", J Acoust Soc Am, 130(4), pp.2043~ (2011)
- Allen K, "Contributions of talker characteristics and spatial location to auditory streaming", J Acoust Soc Am, 123(3), pp.1562~1570 (2008)
- Arbogast TL, "The effect of spatial separation on informational and energetic masking of speech", J Acoust Soc Am, 112(5 Pt 1), pp.2086~2098 (2002)
- Arbogast TL, "The effect of spatial separation on informational masking of speech in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners", J Acoust Soc Am, 117(4 Pt 1), pp.2169~2180 (2005)
- Bolia RS, "A speech corpus for multitalker communications research", J Acoust Soc Am, 107(2), pp.1065~1066 (2000)
- Broadbent DE, "The role of auditory localization in attention and memory span", J Exp Psychol, 47(3), pp.191~196 (1954)
- Brungart DS, "Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of two simultaneous talkers", J Acoust Soc Am, 109(3), pp.1101~1109 (2001)
- Brungart DS, "Multitalker speech perception with ideal time-frequency segregation: effects of voice characteristics and number of talkers", J Acoust Soc Am, 125(6), pp.4006~4022 (2009)
- Brungart DS, "The effects of spatial separation in distance on the informational and energetic masking of a nearby speech signal", J Acoust Soc Am, 112(2), pp.664~676 (2002)
- Brungart DS, "Informational and energetic masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers", J Acoust Soc Am, 110(5 Pt 1), pp.2527~2538 (2001)
- Divenyi PL, "Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly", J Acoust Soc Am, 118(2), pp.1089~1100 (2005)
- Dubno JR, "Benefit from modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing", J Acoust Soc Am, 111(6), pp.2897~2907 (2002)
- Dubno JR, "Recovery from prior stimulation: masking of speech by interrupted noise for younger and older adults with normal hearing", J Acoust Soc Am, 113(4 Pt 1), pp.2084~2094 (2003)
- Durlach NI, "Informational masking: counteracting the effects of stimulus uncertainty by decreasing target-masker similarity", J Acoust Soc Am, 114(1), pp.368~379 (2003)
- Durlach NI, "Informational masking for simultaneous nonspeech stimuli: psychometric functions for fixed and randomly mixed maskers", J Acoust Soc Am, 118(4), pp.2482~2497 (2005)
- Edmonds BA, "The spatial unmasking of speech: evidence for within- channel processing of interaural time delay", J Acoust Soc Am, 117(5), pp.3069~3078 (2005)
- Festen JM, "Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing", J Acoust Soc Am, 88, pp.1725~1736 (1990)
- Freyman RL, "Spatial release from informational masking in speech recognition", J Acoust Soc Am, 109(5 Pt 1), pp.2112~2122 (2001)
- Freyman RL, "Effect of number of masking talkers and auditory priming on informational masking in speech recognition", J Acoust Soc Am, 115(5 Pt 1), pp.2246~2256 (2004)
- Freyman RL, "Spatial release from masking with noise-vocoded speech", J Acoust Soc Am, 124(3), pp.1627~1637 (2008)
- Freyman RL, "The role of perceived spatial separation in the unmasking of speech", J Acoust Soc Am, 106(6), pp.3578~3588 (1999)
- Hawley ML, "The benefit of binaural hearing in a cocktail party: effect of location and type of interferer", J Acoust Soc Am, 115(2), pp.833~843 (2004)
- Helfer KS, "Aging and speech-on-speech masking", Ear Hear, 29(1), pp.87~98 (2008)
- Helfer KS, "Hearing loss, aging, and speech perception in reverberation and noise", J Speech Hear Res, 33(1), pp.149~155 (1990)
- Hirsh IJ, "Relation between localization and intelligibility", J Acoust Soc Am, 22(2), pp.196~200 (1950)
- Humes LE, "Aided speech-identification performance in single-talker competition by older adults with impaired hearing", Scand J Psychol, 50(5), pp.485~494 (2009)
- Humes LE, "Auditory measures of selective and divided attention in young and older adults using single-talker competition", J Acoust Soc Am, 120(5 Pt 1), pp.2926~2937 (2006)
- Ihlefeld A, "Spatial uncertainty reduces the benefit of spatial separation in selective and divided listening", J Acoust Soc Am, 119(5), pp.3417~ (2006)
- Ihlefeld A, "Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects", J Acoust Soc Am, 124(4), pp.2224~2235 (2008)
- Jin IK, "Measurement of K-CRM sentence intelligibility in two-talker listening condition for normal-hearing adults", 14th meeting of Korean Academy of Audiology, 통권 : 14, pp.135~138 (2011)
- Litovsky RY, "Spatial hearing and speech intelligibility in bilateral cochlear implant users", Ear Hear, 30(4), pp.419~431 (2009)
- Lustig C, "The encyclopedia of aging( 3rd ed)", pp.553~555 (2001), Springer
- Noble W, "Hearing speech against spatially separate competing speech versus competing noise", Percept Psychophys, 64(8), pp.1325~1336 (2002)
- Peters RW, "Speech reception thresholds in noise with and without spectral and temporal dips for hearing- impaired and normally hearing people", J Acoust Soc Am, 103(1), pp.577~587 (1998)
- Pichora-Fuller MK, "Processing speed and timing in aging adults: psychoacoustics, speech perception, and comprehension", Int J Audiol, 42(suppl 1), pp.S59~S67 (2003)
- Plomp R, "Speech-reception threshold for senten ces as a function of age and noise level", J Acoust Soc Am, 66(5), pp.1333~1342 (1979)
- Ruggles D, "Spatial selective auditory attention in the presence of reverberant energy: individual differences in normal-hearing listeners", J Assoc Res Otolaryngol, 12(3), pp.395~405 (2011)
- Schoolmaster M, "Effects of re verberation and experience on distance perception in simulated environments (A)", J Acoust Soc Am, 113(4), pp.2285~ (2003)
- Schneider BA, "Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing", Psychol Aging, 20(2), pp.261~271 (2005)
- Schneider BA, "Listening in aging adults: from discourse comprehension to psychoacoustics", Can J Exp Psychol, 56(3), pp.139~152 (2002)
- Snitz BE, "Effects of age, gender, education and race on two tests of language ability in community-based older adults", Int Psychogeriatr, 21(6), pp.1051~1062 (2009)
- Tun PA, "Distraction by competing speech in young and older adult listeners", Psychol Aging, 17(3), pp.453~467 (2002)
- Tun PA, "One voice too many: adult age differences in language processing with different types of distracting sounds", J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci, 54(5), pp.317~327 (1999)
- Wiley TL, "Aging and word recognition in competing message", J Am Acad Audiol, 9(3), pp.191~198 (1998)
- Zurif E, "The allocation of memory resources during sentence comprehension: evidence from the elderly", J Psycholinguist Res, 24(3), pp.165~182 (1995)
