본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

기관지 검체에서의 마이코박테리아 검출 및 동정을 위한 BacT/ALERT 3D System과 PCR-RFLP 병용

Evaluation of Combined Use of BacT/ALERT 3D Liquid Culture System and PCR-RFLP for Detection and Identification of Mycobacteria from Bronchial Specimens

2

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

배경: 본 연구에서는 기관지 검체에서 액체 배지 배양 자동화 장비 BacT/ALERT 3D liquid culture system (bioMérieux, USA)과 중합효소연쇄반응-제한절편길이다형성(PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism, PCR-RFLP)을 이용하여 마 이코박테리아의 검출 및 동정을 시행하고, 기존의 고체 배지 배양과 비교하였다. 방법: 2006년 4월부터 2007년 9월까지, 총 3,037건의 기관지 검체(기관지 세척액 2,309예, 기관지폐포 세척액 728예)를 대상으로, BacT/ALERT MP 액체 배지(bioMérieux, USA)와 고체 배지(3% Ogawa; Shinyang, Korea)에 동시에 접종하여, 두 방법 간의 검출률과 검출 시간의 차이를 비교하였다. BacT/ALERT MP 액체 배지에서 양성이면, Myco-ID (M&D Inc., Korea)를 이용하여 PCR-RFLP 방법으로 균종을 동정하였다. 결과: 총 3,037개의 검체 중 518검체(17.1%)에서 항산균이 배양되었으며, Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) 215건, nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) 303건이었다. 액체 배지에서는 492건(16.2%; 195 MTB, 297 NTM), 고체 배지에서는 416건 (13.7%; 187 MTB, 229 NTM)이 검출되었다(P<0.001). 액체 배지에서만 검출된 경우는 102건(28 MTB, 74 NTM)이었고, 고체 배지에서만 검출된 경우는 26건(20 MTB, 6 NTM)이었다. 마이코박테리아를 검출하는 데 소요된 평균 시간은 액체 배지가 고체 배지보다 빨랐다(18.1 vs 29.3일; P<0.001). 액체 배지에 접종 후 균을 동정하기까지 소요된 총 평균 시간은 21.8일이었다. 양성 액체 배지로 직접 PCR-RFLP를 시행한 결과, MTB (39.1%), M. avium (26.3%), M. abscessus (19.0%), M. intracellulare (12.6%) 등이 동정되었다. 결론: 액체배지 배양과 PCR-RFLP의 병용은 검출률을 높이고 검출 시간을 단축시킬 수 있었으며, 검출률을 최대화하기 위해 고체 배지와의 병용이 권고된다.

Abstract

Background: We evaluated BacT/ALERT 3D liquid culture system (bioMérieux, USA) and PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) for recovery and direct identification of mycobacteria, and the results were compared with a conventional culture system using an egg-based solid medium. Methods: A total of 3,037 bronchial specimens (2,309 bronchial washing fluids and 728 bronchoalveolar lavages) were collected. Decontaminated specimens were inoculated to both BacT/ALERT MP liquid media and Ogawa solid media (3%, Shinyang, Korea). Recovery rate and detection time were compared between the two systems. Liquid media from positive cultures were centrifuged and the pellets were tested for direct identification of mycobacteria by PCR-RFLP using Myco-ID (M&D Inc., Korea). Results: A total of 518 isolates, including 215 M. tuberculosis (MTB) and 303 non-tuberculosis mycobacteria (NTM), were recovered. The liquid media detected 492 isolates (16.2%), including 195 MTB and 297 NTM), whereas the solid media detected 416 isolates (13.7%), including 187 MTB and 229 NTM (P<0.001); 102 isolates (28 MTB and 74 NTM) were recovered only by the liquid media, while 26 (20 MTB and 6 NTM) isolates were recovered only by the solid media. The mean time to detection was 18.1 days by the liquid media and 29.3 days by the solid media (P<0.001). The overall time to species identification from inoculation was 21.8 days. Direct PCR-RFLP from the liquid media identified 39.1% of MTB, 6.3% of M. avium, 19.05 of M. abscessus, and 12.6% of M. intracellulare respectively. Conclusion: Combined use of a liquid culture system and PCR-RFLP improved the recovery rate and shortened the detection time. However, solid media is still necessary to maximize the diagnostic efficiency.

참고문헌 (31)

  1. Shinnick TM, "National plan for reliable tuberculosis laboratory services using a systems approach. Recommendations from CDC and the Association of Public Health Laboratories Task Force on Tuberculosis Laboratory Services", MMWR Recomm Rep, 54, pp.1~12 (2005)
  2. Griffith DE, "An official ATS", IDSA statement: diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of nontuberculous mycobacterial diseases, 2007, pp.175, 367~416
  3. Global tuberculosis control: surveillance, planning, financing. WHO report 2007, , World Health Organization, ~, pp.WHO (2007), HTM[DOI]
  4. Hwang EJ, "Evaluation of a tuberculosis control program at community health centers", J Korean Acad Public Health Nurs, 21, pp.241~251 (2007)
  5. Della-Latta P, "Mycobacteriology and Antimycobacterial Susceptibility Testing. in: Clinical Microbiology Proce. dures Handbook. 2nd ed", pp.71~78 (2004), ASM Press
  6. Pfyffer GE, "Mycobacterium: General Characteristics, Laboratory Detection, and Staining Procedures. In: Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 9th ed", pp.543~572 (2007), ASM Press
  7. "New WHO Policies: Liquid culture backgroud document"[URL]
  8. Laboratory detection and identification of mycobacteria; proposed guideline, "Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute", CLSI, ~, pp.CLSI document M48-P (2007)
  9. "CAP Microbiology Checklists"[URL]
  10. Chang CL, "Survey on changes in mycobacterial testing practicies in Korean laboratories", Korean J Cin Microbiol, 4, pp.108~114 (2001)
  11. Gil-Setas A, "Evaluation of the MB", BacT system compared with Middlebrook 7H11 and Lowenstein-Jensen media for detection and recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens, 2004, pp.10, 224~228
  12. Mirovic V, "Evaluation of the MB", BacT system for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens in comparison to Lowenstein-Jensen medium, 2002, pp.8, 709~714
  13. Abe C, "Comparison of MB-Check, BACTEC, and egg-based media for recovery of mycobacteria", J Clin Microbiol, 30, pp.878~881 (1992)
  14. Alcaide F, "Evaluation of the BACTEC MGIT 960 and the MB", BacT systems for recovery of mycobacteria from clinical specimens and for species identification by DNA AccuProbe, 2000, pp.38, 398~401
  15. Harris G, "Comparison of three isolation systems for the culture of mycobacteria from respiratory and non-respiratory samples", J Clin Pathol, 53, pp.615~618 (2000)
  16. Piersimoni C, "Comparison of MB", Bact alert 3D system with radiometric BACTEC system and Lowenstein-Jensen medium for recovery and identification of mycobacteria from clinical specimens: a multicenter study, 2001, pp.39, 651~657
  17. Adler H, "Comparison of BacT", ALERT 3D, Lowenstein-Jensen medium and Middlebrook 7H10, Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis, pp.2005, 24[DOI]
  18. Crump JA, "Controlled comparison of BACTEC 13A, MYCO", F LYTIC, BacT, J Clin Microbiol, pp.2003, 41[DOI]
  19. Koh WJ, "Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens in Korea", Chest, 129, pp.341~348 (2006), 대한임상미생물학회
  20. 이정연, "한 대학병원에서 비결핵항산균의 분리 및 동정실태", Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases, 58(4), pp.385~391 (2005), 대한결핵및호흡기학회
  21. Koh WJ, "Clinical significance of nontuberculous mycobacteria isolated from respiratory specimens", Korean J Med, 65, pp.10~21 (2003)
  22. Won-Jung Koh, "Diagnosis and Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacterial Pulmonary Diseases: A Korean Perspective", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 20(6), pp.913~925 (2005), 대한의학회
  23. Lew WJ, "Clinical experience on mycobacterial diseases other than tuberculosis", Tuberc Respir Dis, 39, pp.425~432 (1992)
  24. Bai GH, "Clinically isolated mycobacteria other than mycobacterium tuberculosis from 1980 to 1990 in Korea", J Korean Soc Microbiol, 28, pp.1~5 (1993)
  25. Kim YS, "Comparison of MGIT (Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube) with Ogawa media for recovery of mycobacteria", Korean J Cin Microbiol, 4, pp.58~61 (2001)
  26. Choi YM, "Evaluation of MGIT 960 system for recovery of mycobacteria from body fluids", Korean J Cin Microbiol, 6, pp.69~73 (2003)
  27. Choi YM, "Evaluation of BACTEC MGIT 960 system for recovery of mycobacteria", Korean J Clin Pathol, 20, pp.56~61 (2000)
  28. Lee JY, "Detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis using BACTEC Mycobacteria Growth Indicator Tube (MGIT) 960 system-Comparision with BACTEC 460 TB system and Ogawa media", Korean J Lab Med, 20, pp.384~391 (2000)
  29. 이기은, "항산균 배양 및 동정방법의 변화에 따른 양성률과 보고시간 변화", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 25(1), pp.46~52 (2005), 대한진단검사의학회
  30. 박철민, "중합효소연쇄반응-제한절편길이다형성을 이용한 비결핵항산균의 분리", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 26(3), pp.161~167 (2006), 대한진단검사의학회
  31. 양희영, "결핵 진단에 있어서 In-house 중합효소연쇄반응법과 전통적인 진단 방법간의 비교검토", The Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 26(3), pp.174~178 (2006), 대한진단검사의학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)