본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Economic Crisis, Public Administration, and Governance

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정책학

초록

The global financial crisis that began in 2008 has had a significant impact on public administration in most countries in the world. This paper explores several dichotomies in which each of two opposing approaches to public management are frequently advocated and may be appropriate in different circumstances: path dependence (adhering to existing policies or changing course), centralization or decentralization, politicization (reliance on political appointees or the permanent bureaucracy), coordination and coherence or retention of power by individual ministries or agencies, and time perspective (the search for quick relief or long-term solutions). The crisis has disrupted the stability of public administration in many countries. At the same time, it has facilitated policy and institutional changes that otherwise might not have been possible to implement. Different countries, experiencing the current economic crisis in different ways, have chosen different options within these dichotomies, with varying levels of success.

Abstract

The global financial crisis that began in 2008 has had a significant impact on public administration in most countries in the world. This paper explores several dichotomies in which each of two opposing approaches to public management are frequently advocated and may be appropriate in different circumstances: path dependence (adhering to existing policies or changing course), centralization or decentralization, politicization (reliance on political appointees or the permanent bureaucracy), coordination and coherence or retention of power by individual ministries or agencies, and time perspective (the search for quick relief or long-term solutions). The crisis has disrupted the stability of public administration in many countries. At the same time, it has facilitated policy and institutional changes that otherwise might not have been possible to implement. Different countries, experiencing the current economic crisis in different ways, have chosen different options within these dichotomies, with varying levels of success.

참고문헌 (18)

  1. Baumgartner, F. R., "Agendas and instability in American politics, 2nd ed" (2009), University of Chicago Press
  2. Boin, A., "Governing after crisis: The politics of investigation, accountability and learning" (2008), Cambridge University Press
  3. Braun, D., "Political ideas and public policies" (1999), Edward Elgar
  4. Calmes, J., "Obama vows swift action on vast stimulus program", New York Times, ~ (2008)
  5. Fleischer, J., "Steering from the German center: More policy coordination and fewer policy initiatives, in: Steering from the center" (2010), University of Toronto Press
  6. Hood, C., "Blame avoidance in government" (2010), Princeton University Press
  7. Kingdon, J. W., "Agendas, alternatives and public policies" (2003), Longman
  8. Krasner, S., "Approaches to the state: Alternative conceptions and historical dynamics. Comparative Politics 16:223-46", Comparative Poli, 16, pp.223~246 (1984)
  9. Light, P. C., "Thickening government" (1995), The Brookings Institution
  10. Committee on Public Governance. 2009. Governance responses to economic crises: Country reports, "OECD", OECD, ~ (2009)
  11. Painter, M. A., "Administrative traditions and administrative reforms" (2010), Macmillan
  12. Peters, B. G., "What works?: The antiphons of administrative reform, in: Taking stock: Assessing public sector reforms" (1998), McGill-Queens University Press
  13. Peters, B. G., "Politicization of the civil service: The quest for control" (2004), Routledge
  14. Pollitt, C., "Unbundled government: A critical analysis of the global trend to agencies, quangos and contractualisation" (2003), Routledge
  15. Simon, H. A., "Administrative behavior" (1947), The Free Press
  16. Thelen, K., "Historical institutionalism in comparative politics, in: Structuring politics: Historical institutionalism in comparative analysis", Cambridge University Press, pp.1~32 (1992)
  17. Weaver, R. K., "Do institutions matter?" (1993), Brookings Institution
  18. Wildavsky, A., "The politics of the budgetary process, 4th ed" (1984), Little, Brown

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)