Recommended Auditory Brainstem Responses to Stimulation and Recording Parameters for Hidden Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Although a lesion of hidden hearing loss (HHL) has focused on the sprial ganglion, stimulation and recording parameters for auditory brainstem response (ABR) are not yet specific enough to confirm its dysfunction. In the current review, we identify ABR parameters, especially Wave I, for diagnosing HHL through both a systemic review and meta-analysis of 14 articles retrieved from seven journal data bases. The most commonly used parameters were a click or 4 kHz tone burst as the stimulus at a rate of less than 11/sec at more than 80 dB intensity levels with alternating polarity through the ear canal. For quantitative results, our meta-analysis from eight articles demonstrated a significant difference in the overall effect size for amplitude between HHL patients and their counterparts with normal hearing. For the subgroup and its analysis, tone burst and high intensity level revealed significantly lower effect size in HHL patients compared to the control group, whereas the stimuli rate and electrode montage statstically were not statistical significance. Although we examined a small number of studies and their heterogenity, obtaining ABR Wave I was clinically differentiated when noise-induced HHL was considered. We thus suggest that stimulation and recording parameters should be applied to a large number of patients and thereby standardized as sensitive features for Wave I in the clinic.
Abstract
Although a lesion of hidden hearing loss (HHL) has focused on the sprial ganglion, stimulation and recording parameters for auditory brainstem response (ABR) are not yet specific enough to confirm its dysfunction. In the current review, we identify ABR parameters, especially Wave I, for diagnosing HHL through both a systemic review and meta-analysis of 14 articles retrieved from seven journal data bases. The most commonly used parameters were a click or 4 kHz tone burst as the stimulus at a rate of less than 11/sec at more than 80 dB intensity levels with alternating polarity through the ear canal. For quantitative results, our meta-analysis from eight articles demonstrated a significant difference in the overall effect size for amplitude between HHL patients and their counterparts with normal hearing. For the subgroup and its analysis, tone burst and high intensity level revealed significantly lower effect size in HHL patients compared to the control group, whereas the stimuli rate and electrode montage statstically were not statistical significance. Although we examined a small number of studies and their heterogenity, obtaining ABR Wave I was clinically differentiated when noise-induced HHL was considered. We thus suggest that stimulation and recording parameters should be applied to a large number of patients and thereby standardized as sensitive features for Wave I in the clinic.
참고문헌 (28)
- Bhatt, I. S., "Evaluation of dichotic listening performance in normal-hearing, noise-exposed young females", Hearing Research, 380, pp.10~21 (2019)
- Borg, E., "Noise-induced hearing loss. Literature review and experiments in rabbits. Morphological and electrophysiological features, exposure parameters and temporal factors, variability and interactions", Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum, 40, pp.1~147 (1995)
- Bramhall, N. F., "Tinnitus and auditory perception after a history of noise exposure : Relationship to auditory brainstem response measures", Ear and Hearing, 39(5), pp.881~894 (2018)
- Bramhall, N. F., "Auditory brainstem response altered in humans with noise exposure despite normal outer hair cell function", Ear and Hearing, 38(1), pp.e1~e12 (2017)
- Fulbright, A. N. C., "Effects of recreational noise on threshold and suprathreshold measures of auditory function", Seminars in Hearing, 38(4), pp.298~318 (2017)
- GRADE Working Group, "Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations", British Medical Journal, 328(7454), pp.1490~ (2004)
- Grinn, S. K., "Hidden hearing loss? No effect of common recreational noise exposure on cochlear nerve response amplitude in humans", Frontiers in Neuroscience, 11, pp.465~ (2017)
- Grose, J. H., "Loud music exposure and cochlear synaptopathy in young adults : Isolated auditory brainstem response effects but no perceptual consequences", Trends in Hearing, 21, pp.2331216517737417~ (2017)
- Guest, H., "Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram : No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure", Hearing Research, 364, pp.142~151 (2018)
- Henshaw, H., "Efficacy of individual computerbased auditory training for people with hearing loss : A systematic review of the evidence", PLoS One, 8(5), pp.e62836~ (2013)
- Hu, N., "Protection of cochlear synapses from noise-induced excitotoxic trauma by blockade of Ca2+-permeable AMPA receptors", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 117(7), pp.3828~3838 (2020)
- Kujawa, S. G., "Synaptopathy in the noiseexposed and aging cochlea : Primary neural degeneration in acquired sensorineural hearing loss", Hearing Research, 330(Pt B), pp.191~199 (2015)
- Liberati A., "The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions : Explanation and elaboration", PLoS Medicine, 6(7), pp.e1000100~ (2009)
- Liberman, L. D., "Dynamics of cochlear synaptopathy after acoustic overexposure", Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 16(2), pp.205~219 (2015)
- Liberman, M. C., "Hidden hearing loss", Scientific American, 313(2), pp.48~53 (2015)
- Liberman, M. C., "Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans", PLoS One, 11(9), pp.e0162726~ (2016)
- Lin, H. W., "Primary neural degeneration in the Guinea pig cochlea after reversible noise-induced threshold shift", Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 12(5), pp.605~616 (2011)
- Lobarinas, E., "Evidence of"hidden hearing loss"following noise exposures that produce robust TTS and ABR Wave-I amplitude reductions", Hearing Research, 349, pp.155~163 (2017)
- Plack, C. J., "Perceptual consequences of"hidden"hearing loss", Trends in Hearing, 18, pp.2331216514550621~ (2014)
- Prendergast, G., "Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I : Electrophysiology", Hearing Research, 344, pp.68~81 (2017)
- Prendergast, G., "Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure", Hearing Research, 364, pp.38~47 (2018)
- Shi, L., "Cochlear synaptopathy and noise-induced hidden hearing loss", Neural Plasticity, 2016, pp.6143164~ (2016)
- Skoe, E., "Evidence of noise-induced subclinical hearing loss using auditory brainstem responses and objective measures of noise exposure in humans", Hearing Research, 361, pp.80~91 (2018)
- Spankovich, C., "Noise history and auditory function in young adults with and without type 1 diabetes mellitus", Ear and Hearing, 38(6), pp.724~735 (2017)
- Stamper, G. C., "Auditory function in normal-hearing, noise-exposed human ears", Ear and Hearing, 36(2), pp.172~184 (2015)
- Stephens, D., "Is there an association between noise exposure and King Kopetzky syndrome?", Noise and Health, 5(20), pp.55~62 (2003)
- Valderrama, J. T., "Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middleage human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-innoise intelligibility", Hearing Research, 365, pp.36~48 (2018)
- "1.1 Billion People at Risk of Hearing Loss" (2015)[URL]