본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

A Corpus-Based Analysis of Scientific Writing in L2 College Students

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

In Korea, a growing number of colleges have mandated ‘English-only lectures.’ With the expanding interests of using English in college lectures, it is necessary not only to evaluate usefulness of maintaining such a policy, but also to assess students’ works to provide better English-mediated instruction in higher educational institutions. Therefore, the current research investigates how Korean undergraduate students at a science and technology focused university use English in their laboratory reports. To this end, 171 chemistry lab reports and 110 biology lab reports were collected, and the collected reports were compiled into a study corpora. The corpora were compared against the academic reports of an upper-level students’ corpus, MICUSP, to investigate the typical linguistic characteristics of the lab reports. It was found that the lab reports contain some traits of general academic reports, such as the use of auxiliary verbs for representing the degree of certainty. However, there are also traits signaling non-canonical features of the lab report genre in debriefing results. With the results of the current study, it is expected that the coverage of EAP and ESP for specific academic fields can be expanded so that customized English programs and materials can be developed.

Abstract

In Korea, a growing number of colleges have mandated ‘English-only lectures.’ With the expanding interests of using English in college lectures, it is necessary not only to evaluate usefulness of maintaining such a policy, but also to assess students’ works to provide better English-mediated instruction in higher educational institutions. Therefore, the current research investigates how Korean undergraduate students at a science and technology focused university use English in their laboratory reports. To this end, 171 chemistry lab reports and 110 biology lab reports were collected, and the collected reports were compiled into a study corpora. The corpora were compared against the academic reports of an upper-level students’ corpus, MICUSP, to investigate the typical linguistic characteristics of the lab reports. It was found that the lab reports contain some traits of general academic reports, such as the use of auxiliary verbs for representing the degree of certainty. However, there are also traits signaling non-canonical features of the lab report genre in debriefing results. With the results of the current study, it is expected that the coverage of EAP and ESP for specific academic fields can be expanded so that customized English programs and materials can be developed.

참고문헌 (48)

  1. Archer, D., "What’s in a Word-list?", pp.1~16 (2008), England, UK
  2. Baker, P., "Using corpora in discourse analysis" (2006), Continuum
  3. Barber, C. L., "Episodes in ESP", pp.1~16 (1985), Pergamon
  4. Basturkmen, H., "Ideas and options in English for specific purposes" (2006), Lawrence Erlbaum
  5. Belcher, D., "English for specific purposes in theory and practice" (2009), University of Michigan Press
  6. Belcher, D., "New directions in English for specific purposes research" (2011), University of Michigan Press
  7. Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  8. Biber, D., "Longman student grammar of spoken and written English" (2002), Longman
  9. Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" (1999), Longman
  10. Dudley-Evans, T., "Developments in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  11. Fetzer, A., "Cognitive verbs in context : A contrastive analysis of English and French argumentative discourse", International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 15(2), pp.240~266 (2010)
  12. Firth, J. R., "Studies in linguistic analysis", pp.1~32 (1957), Basil Blackwell
  13. Flowerdew, J., "Research perspectives on English for academic purposes" (2001), Cambridge University Press
  14. Gledhill, C., "Collocations in science writing" (2000), Gunter Narr
  15. Groom. N., "Keyness in texts", pp.59~78 (2010), John Benjamins
  16. Hinkel, E., "Second language writers’ text: Linguistics and rhetorical features" (2002), Lawrence Erlbaum
  17. Hirose, K., "Comparing L1 and L2 organizational patterns in the argumentative writing of Japanese EFL students", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, pp.181~209 (2003)
  18. 홍신철, "A Descriptive Analysis of Key N-grams in Korean English Learners’ Writing", 영어교육연구, 25(3), pp.1~19 (2013), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  19. Hunston, S., "Corpora in applied linguistics" (2002), Cambridge University Press
  20. Hutchinson, T., "English for specific purposes: A learning-centered approach" (1987), Cambridge University Press
  21. Hyland, K., "A genre description of the argumentative essay", RELC Journal, 21, pp.66~78 (1990)
  22. Hyland, K., "Directives : Argument and engagement in academic writing", Applied Linguistics, 23(2), pp.215~239 (2002)
  23. Hyland, K., "Genre and second language writing" (2004), University of Michigan Press
  24. Ivanič, R., "Writing and identity: The discoursal construction of identity in academic writing" (1997), John Benjamins
  25. Johns, T., "Perspectives on pedagogical grammar", pp.293~313 (1993), Cambridge University Press
  26. Jordan, R. R., "English for academic purposes: A guide and resource book for teachers" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  27. 정미애, "중학교 2학년 영어 교과서 코퍼스 분석", 인문논총, 23, pp.135~157 (2009), 인문과학연구소
  28. 강범모, "언어 기술을 위한 코퍼스의 구축과 빈도(통계) 활용", 한국사전학, (12), pp.7~40 (2008), 한국사전학회
  29. 강현석, "한국인의 영어 논문과 작문에 나타나는 관계사 사용의 변이", 사회언어학, 16(2), pp.1~28 (2008), 한국사회언어학회
  30. Lewis, M., "The lexical approach: The state of ELT and a way forward" (1993), Language Teaching Publications
  31. Liu, M., "Cohesive features in argumentative writing produced by Chinese undergraduates", System, 33, pp.623~636 (2005)
  32. Matsuda, P. K., "Voice in academic writing : The rhetorical construction of author identity in blind manuscript review", English for Specific Purposes, 26(2), pp.235~249 (2007)
  33. Mauranen, A., "New directions in English for specific purposes research", pp.94~117 (2011), University of Michigan Press
  34. 남대현, "A Corpus-Based Contrastive Analysis of Korean College Students’ English Composition", 영어교육연구, 25(4), pp.67~85 (2013), 팬코리아영어교육학회
  35. Nesi, H., "New trends in corpora and language learning", pp.213~228 (2011), Continuum
  36. 박선옥, "한국인 영어교사와 학생들의 작문에 나타난 관사사용의 분포와 오류유형 분석", 언어과학연구, 38(38), pp.161~185 (2006), 언어과학회
  37. Park, Y., "An analysis of errors in second language writing by English learners at university", Studies in Language, 15(2), pp.73~89 (1999)
  38. Römer, U., "How to use corpora in language teaching", pp.185~199 (2004), John Benjamins
  39. Römer, U., "Applying corpus methods to written academic texts: Explorations of MICUSP", Journal of Writting Research, 2(2), pp.99~127 (2010)
  40. Scott, M., "Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis: Proceedings from the forth international conference on teaching and language corpora", pp.43~50 (2002), Rodopi
  41. Scott, M., (2008), Lexical Analysis Software
  42. Scott, M., "Keyness in texts", pp.43~78 (2010), John Benjamins
  43. Scott, M., "Textual patterns: Key words and corpus analysis in language education" (2006), John Benjamins
  44. Stubbs, M., "Keyness in texts", pp.21~42 (2010), John Benjamins
  45. Swales, J., "Writing specific English" (1971), Thomas Nelson and Sons Ltd
  46. Swales, J., "Episodes in ESP" (1985), Pergamon
  47. 윤현숙, "개정 교육과정 중학교 1학년 영어교과서에 나타난 어휘의 코퍼스 기반 분석", 현대영어교육, 10(2), pp.87~107 (2009), 현대영어교육학회
  48. 윤현숙, "한국 학생들의 영어 작문에 나타난 생산적 어휘에 관한 분석", 영어학, 10(1), pp.86~104 (2010), 한국영어학회

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)