성과 성역할 정체감 및 성격특성이 의사소통 어려움 지각에 미치는 영향
The effects of gender, gender role identity, and personality characteristics on the perceived communication difficulty
0
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
이 연구는 남녀 대학생(405명)을 대상으로 개인의 성과 성역할 정체감 및 성격특성(정서적 불안정성과 외향성)이 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에 어떤 영향을 주는지를 검증하였다. 연구대상자들에게 성역할 정체감 척도와 의사소통 어려움 지각 척도, 정서적 불안정성 척도 및 외향성 척도를 실시하여 연구한 결과, 여성들이 남성들보다 동성과의 의사소통을 더 어렵다고 지각하였으나 이성과의 의사소통 지각에서는 성차가 나타나지 않았다. 그러나 성역할 정체감은 동성과는 물론 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에도 유의한 영향을 주어, 양성적 및 남성적 성역할 정체감을 지니고 있는 사람들이 여성적 혹은 미분화의 성역할 정체감 소유자들보다 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움을 더 적게 지각하였다. 또한 정서적 불안정성이 높은 사람들이 낮은 사람들보다 그리고 외향성이 낮은 사람들이 높은 사람들보다 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통을 더 어렵다고 지각하였다. 성역할 정체감과 성격특성이 동성 및 이성과의 의사소통 어려움 지각에 미치는 상대적 영향을 비교한 결과, 남녀 구분없이 외향성이 가장 큰 영향을 미치고 그 다음이 정서적 불안정성이었으며, 남성성과 여성성은 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하였다.
Abstract
This study examined the effects of gender, gender role identity and two personality characteristics on the perceived communication difficulty with male and female college students. Statistical analysis revealed in the same-sex communication female perceived more communication difficulty than male, but in the opposite-sex communication no gender effect was found. Gender role identity had significant effects on the same- and opposite-sex communication. That is, the person with the androgynous and masculine gender role identity perceived the lower level of communication difficulty than feminine and undifferentiated the one in the same- and opposite-sex communication. Also the person with the low level of neuroticism and high level of extraversion has low level of perceived communication difficulty. And regression analysis revealed extraversion has the greatest effect, which is followed by neuroticism, but the masculinity and femininity has no effects on the perceived communication difficulty in male and female.
참고문헌 (27)
- 노동부, "직업선호도검사 실시요람", 노동부 중앙고용정보관리소, ~ (2000)
- 장휘숙, "개인의 성과 성역할 정체감이 대화의 중단과 대화량에 미치는 영향", 한국심리학회지: 발달, 17(4), pp.107~120 (2004)
- 정진경, "한국 성역할 검사", 한국심리학회지: 사회, 5(1), pp.82~92 (1990)
- Basow, S, "Troubles talk: Effects of gender and gender-typing", Sex Roles, 48(3), pp.183~187 (2003)
- Bem, S. L, "The measurement of psych- ological androgyny", Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, pp.155~162 (1974)
- Broverman, I. K, "Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal", Journal of Social Issues, 28, pp.59~78 (1972)
- Burke, P. J, "The link between identity and role performance.", Social Psychology Quarterly, 44, pp.83~92 (1981)
- Drass, K. A, "The effect of gender identity on conversation", Social Psychology Quarterly, 49(4), pp.294~301 (1986)
- Eagly, A. H, "Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation" (1987), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
- Edwards, R, "The effects of gender, gender role, and values on the interpretation of messages", Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 17(1), pp.52~71 (1998)
- Interpreting relational meanings: The influence of sex and gender- role. Vol. 17(1), "Edwards, R", Communication Research Reports, 13~21 (2000)
- Edwards, R, "You need to understand my gender role: An empirical test of Tannen's model of gender and communication", Sex Roles, 50(7), pp.491~504 (2004)
- Edwards, R, "The effects of loneliness and verbal aggressiveness on message interpretation", Southern communication Journal, 66, pp.139~150 (2001)
- Gilbert, L. A., "Toward mental health: The benefits of psychological androgyny", Professional Psychology, 12(1), pp.29~38 (1981)
- Keaten, J, "Development of an instrument to measure reticence", Paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Speech Communication Association (1993), Miami Beach, FL, USA.
- Knapp, M. L, "Perceptions of communication behavior associated with relationship terms", Communication Monographs, 47, pp.262~278 (1980)
- MacLeod, C, "Anxiety and the interpretation of ambiguity: A text comprehension study", Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 102, pp.238~247 (1993)
- Maltz, D. N, "A cultural approach to male-female miscommunication; Language and social identity", pp.196~216 (1982), Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press
- McCall, G. J, "Identities and interactions" (1966), New York: The Free Press
- McCroskey, J. C, "The effect of systematic desensitization on speech anxiety", Speech Teacher, 19, pp.32~36 (1970)
- Spence, J. T, "Achievement-related motives and behaviors ; Achievement and achievement motives" (1983), San Francisco: Freeman
- Stryker, S, "Symbolic interactionism: A social structural version", Menlo Park: The Benjamin
- Tannen, D., "You just don't understand: Women and men in conversation" (1990), New York: Morrow
- Tannen, D., "The relativity of linguistic strategies: Rethinking power and solidarity in gender and dominance ; Gender and conversational interaction", pp.165~180 (1993), New York: Oxford University Press
- Thorne, B, "Language and Sex: Difference and dominance" (1975), Rowley, MA: Newbury House
- West, C, "Women's place in everyday talk: Reflections on parent-child interactions", Social Problems, 24, pp.521~528 (1977)
- Zimmerman, D. H, "Sex roles, interruptions and silences in conversation; Language and sex: Difference and dominance" (1975), Rowley, MA: Newbury House