본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Investigating Underlying Factors in Measuring Lexical- Grammatical Knowledge for English Tests

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study investigates how the English tests, the English Test for Certified Public Tax Accountants (ETCPTA) and the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC),assess lexical-grammatical knowledge and confirms whether they share task characteristics in measuring lexical-grammatical knowledge as a means of screening Certified Public Tax Accountants (CPTA) in Korea. First, this study examines the extent to which lexicalgrammatical knowledge factors explain the variance of the observed test results for each test. Hypothesized factor models, including three single-factor models of structure, vocabulary, and structure and vocabulary knowledge, and a two-factor model of structure and vocabulary, were estimated to discover the most appropriate fit model for each test. Second, the study questions whether ETCPTA and TOEIC would be possibly interchangeable in their test design when assessing lexical-grammatical knowledge. CFA results confirmed that ETCPTA and TOEIC were characterized by the different factor structure when assessing lexical-grammatical knowledge. Firstly, judging from the Item-Level CFA results for ETCPTA, three hypothesized models were proved to be acceptable (the Single-Factor Model of Structure, the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary, and the Two-Factor Model of Vocabulary and Structure). For TOEIC,however, two hypothesized models fit the data (the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary and the Single-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary Knowledge). Secondly, one notable point in TOEIC’s favor is that the Single-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary Knowledge fits the data, suggesting that parts 5 and 6 can be combined into a single section depending on the CFA results. This indicated that for TOEIC, lexical-grammatical knowledge as a comprehensive term was perceived as being an underlying factor, while the ETCPTA test data were accounted for by the Single-Factor Model of Structure, the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary, and the Two-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary, respectively, suggesting that independent structure and vocabulary knowledge were underlying factors on the ETCPTA data.

Abstract

This study investigates how the English tests, the English Test for Certified Public Tax Accountants (ETCPTA) and the Test of English for International Communication (TOEIC),assess lexical-grammatical knowledge and confirms whether they share task characteristics in measuring lexical-grammatical knowledge as a means of screening Certified Public Tax Accountants (CPTA) in Korea. First, this study examines the extent to which lexicalgrammatical knowledge factors explain the variance of the observed test results for each test. Hypothesized factor models, including three single-factor models of structure, vocabulary, and structure and vocabulary knowledge, and a two-factor model of structure and vocabulary, were estimated to discover the most appropriate fit model for each test. Second, the study questions whether ETCPTA and TOEIC would be possibly interchangeable in their test design when assessing lexical-grammatical knowledge. CFA results confirmed that ETCPTA and TOEIC were characterized by the different factor structure when assessing lexical-grammatical knowledge. Firstly, judging from the Item-Level CFA results for ETCPTA, three hypothesized models were proved to be acceptable (the Single-Factor Model of Structure, the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary, and the Two-Factor Model of Vocabulary and Structure). For TOEIC,however, two hypothesized models fit the data (the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary and the Single-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary Knowledge). Secondly, one notable point in TOEIC’s favor is that the Single-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary Knowledge fits the data, suggesting that parts 5 and 6 can be combined into a single section depending on the CFA results. This indicated that for TOEIC, lexical-grammatical knowledge as a comprehensive term was perceived as being an underlying factor, while the ETCPTA test data were accounted for by the Single-Factor Model of Structure, the Single-Factor Model of Vocabulary, and the Two-Factor Model of Structure and Vocabulary, respectively, suggesting that independent structure and vocabulary knowledge were underlying factors on the ETCPTA data.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. Alderson, J. C., "The relationship between grammar and reading in an English for academic purposes test battery, In A new decade of language testing research: Selected papers from the 1990 language testing research colloquium", pp.203~219 (1993), TESOL
  2. Bachman, L. F., "Language testing in practice" (1996), Oxford University Press
  3. Barnett, M. A., "Syntactic and lexical", semantic skill on foreign language reading : Importance and interaction, 1986, pp.70, 343~349
  4. Berry, M. T., "The relationship between analyzed knowledge of grammar and reading comprehension of authentic text at four levels of secondary school French", Dissertation Abstracts International, 51, pp.2295~ (1991)
  5. Biemiller, A., "Vocabulary : Needed if more children are to read well", Reading Psychology, 24, pp.323~335 (2003)
  6. Bolinger, D., "Meaning and form" (1977), Longman
  7. Brisbois, J. E., "Connections between first-and second-language reading", Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, pp.565~584 (1995)
  8. Burt, M., "Reading and adult English language learners: A review of the research" (2003), Center for Applied Linguistics
  9. EFL teacher’s course, "The grammar book: An ESL", pp.1999, Celce-Murcia, M.
  10. Chomsky, N., "Aspects of the theory of syntax" (1965), MIT Press
  11. Coady, J., "High frequency vocabulary and reading proficiency in ESL readers, In Second language reading and vocabulary learning", pp.217~228 (1993), Ablex Publishing Corporation
  12. Doughty, C, "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  13. Ellis, R., "Investigating form-focused instruction", Language Learning, 5, pp.1~46 (2001)
  14. Goldberg, R., "Deconstructing the great wall of print", Connections : A Journal of Adult Literacy, 7, pp.8~13 (1997)
  15. Guarino, R., "Awareness of form class as a factor in ESL reading comprehension", Language Learning, 36, pp.77~83 (1986)
  16. Haarman, L., "Some considerations on the role of grammar in L2 reading", Studi italiani di linguistica teorica ed applicata, anno XVII, numero 1, ~ (1988)
  17. Halliday, M. A. K., "An introduction to functional grammar" (1994), Edward Arnold
  18. Hu, L., "Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?", Psychological Bulletin, 112, pp.351~362 (1992)
  19. Hu, L. T., "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural Equation Modeling : A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, pp.1~55 (1999)
  20. Khaldieh, S. A., "The relationship between knowledge of fraab, lexical knowledge, and reading comprehension of nonnative readers of Arabic", Modern Language Journal, 55, pp.416~431 (2001)
  21. Kim, H. J, "Investigating the effects of context and task type on second language speaking ability", 박사, pp.2009
  22. Koda, K., "The effects of transferred vocabulary knowledge on the development of L2 reading proficiency", Foreign Language Annals, 22, pp.529~42 (1989)
  23. Laufer, B., "Reading in a foreign language: How does L2 lexical knowledge interact with readers’ general academic ability?", Journal of Research in Reading, 15, pp.95~103 (1992)
  24. Leong, C. K., "Learning to read and spell English words by Chinese students", Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, pp.63~84 (2005)
  25. Levine, A., "Does the method of vocabulary and presentation make a difference?", TESL Canada Journal, 8, pp.37~51 (1990)
  26. Long, M., "Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice, In Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.15~41 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  27. Mecartty, F. H., "Lexical and grammatical knowledge in reading and listening comprehension by foreign language learners of Spanish", Applied Language Learning, 11, pp.323~48 (2000)
  28. Purpura, J. E., "An analysis of the relationships between test takers’ cognitive and metacognitive strategy use and second language test performance", Language Learning, 47, pp.289~294 (1997)
  29. Purpura, J. E., "Investigating the effects of strategy use and second language test performance with high-and low-ability test takers : A structural equation modeling approach", Language Testing, 15, pp.333~379 (1998)
  30. Purpura, J. E., "Assessing grammar" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  31. Qian, D. D., "Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective", Language Learning, 52, pp.513~536 (2002)
  32. Qian, D. D., "Evaluation of an in-depth vocabulary knowledge measure for reading performance", Language Testing, 21, pp.28~52 (2004)
  33. Radford, A., "Syntactic theory and the structure of English: A minimalist approach" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  34. Radwan, A. A., "The effectiveness of explicit attention to form in language learning", System, 33, pp.69~87 (2005)
  35. Rea-Dickins, P., "The relationship between grammatical abilities and aspects of communicative competence: With specific reference to the testing of grammar", 박사, pp.1987
  36. Investigating the construct validity of the cloze section in the Examination for the Certificate of Proficiency in English, "Saito, Y.", 39~82, pp.Spaan Fellow Working Papers in Second or Foreign Language Assessment, 1 (2003)
  37. Shiotsu, T., "The relative significance of syntactic knowledge and vocabulary breadth in the prediction of reading comprehension test performance", Language Testing, 24, pp.99~128 (2007)
  38. Skehan, P., "A cognitive approach to language learning" (1998), Oxford University Press
  39. Ulijn, J. M., "The effect of syntactic simplification on reading EST texts as LI and L2", Journal of Research in Reading, 13, pp.38~54 (1990)
  40. van Gelderen, A., "Roles of linguistic knowledge, metacognitive knowledge and processing speed in L3, L2 and LI reading comprehension : A structural equation modeling approach", International Journal of Bilingualism, 7, pp.7~25 (2003)
  41. Williams, J., "Learner-generated attention to form", Language Learning, 5(Suppl.1), pp.303~346 (2001)
  42. Yen-fen, Liao., "A construct validation study of the GEPT reading and listening sections: Re-examining the models of L2 reading and listening abilities and their relations to lexical-grammatical knowledge", 박사, pp.2009

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)