본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Teaching Second Language Grammar: Deductive versus Inductive Instruction

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

This study investigates differential effects of deductive versus inductive form-focusedinstruction (FFI) onthe acquisition of a generalization ability of L2 target rule when the FFI isprovided within a context of primarily meaning-focused instruction (MFI). Sixty-threeKorean-speaking adult learners of English participated in the study and were randomly assignedto one of the fourgroups, such as (1) a group who received deductive FFI and MFI; (2) a groupwho received inductive FFI and MFI; (3) a group who received MFI only; or (4) a control group,who received no instruction.Learning was measured by an auditory grammaticality judgmenttask and a metalinguistic knowledge task. The results indicate that both deductive and inductivetypes of FFI are equally effective in immediately developing the rule generalization ability;however, the deductive FFI promotes retention of the generalization ability in the long term.

Abstract

This study investigates differential effects of deductive versus inductive form-focusedinstruction (FFI) onthe acquisition of a generalization ability of L2 target rule when the FFI isprovided within a context of primarily meaning-focused instruction (MFI). Sixty-threeKorean-speaking adult learners of English participated in the study and were randomly assignedto one of the fourgroups, such as (1) a group who received deductive FFI and MFI; (2) a groupwho received inductive FFI and MFI; (3) a group who received MFI only; or (4) a control group,who received no instruction.Learning was measured by an auditory grammaticality judgmenttask and a metalinguistic knowledge task. The results indicate that both deductive and inductivetypes of FFI are equally effective in immediately developing the rule generalization ability;however, the deductive FFI promotes retention of the generalization ability in the long term.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. Alanen, R., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.259~302 (1995), University of Hawai'i Press
  2. Allen, J. F., "Readings in planning" (1990), Morgan Kaufmann Publishers
  3. Bygate, M., "Challenge and change in language teaching", pp.136~146 (1996), Heinemann
  4. Carr, T. H., "Cognitive factors in learning about structured sequences", Studies in second language acquisition, 16(2), pp.205~230 (1994)
  5. Carroll, S., "Explicit and implicit negative feedback : An empirical study of the learning of linguistic generalizations", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15(3), pp.357~386 (1993)
  6. De Graaff, R., "The experanto experiment : Effects of explicit instruction on second language acquisition", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.249~276 (1997)
  7. DeKeyser, R. M., "Learning second language grammar rules : An experiment with a miniature linguistic system", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 17(3), pp.397~410 (1995)
  8. Doughty, C., "Second language instruction does make a difference; Evidence from an empirical study of SL relativization", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, pp.431~469 (1991)
  9. Doughty, C., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
  10. Ellis, N. C., "Rules and instances in foreign language learning : Interactions of explicit and implicit knowledge", European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 5(3), pp.289~318 (1993)
  11. Ellis, R., "Current issues in the teaching of grammar : An SLA perspective", TESOL Quarterly, 40, pp.83~107 (2006)
  12. Erlam, R., "Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and ouput-based instruction in foreign language learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, pp.559~582 (2003)
  13. Fotos, S., "The cloze test as an integrative measure of EFL proficiency: A substitute for essays on college entrance examinations?", Language Learning, 41, pp.313~336 (1991)
  14. Fotos, S., "Consciousness-raising and noticing through focus on form : Grammar task performance versus formal instruction", Applied Linguistics, 14, pp.385~407 (1993)
  15. Fotos, S., "Communicating about grammar : A task-based approach", TESOL Quarterly, 25, pp.605~628 (1991)
  16. Hama, M., "Learning without awareness" (2010), Extending
  17. Williams, , Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32(3), pp.465~491 (2005)
  18. Harley, B., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.156~173 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  19. Herron, C., "Acquiring grammatical structures by guided induction", The French Review, 65, pp.708~718 (1992)
  20. Juffs, A., "The influence of the first language on the processing of wh-movement in English as a second language", Second Language Research, 21, pp.121~151 (2005)
  21. Knowlton, B. J., "The information acquired during artificial grammar learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning", Memory and Cognition, 20, pp.79~91 (1994)
  22. Knowlton, B. J., "Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning", Memory and Cognition, 22, pp.169~181 (1996)
  23. Larsen-Freeman, D., "An introduction to second language acquisition research" (1991), Longman
  24. Leow, R. P., "Attention, awareness, and foreign language behavior", Language Learning, 47, pp.467~506 (1997)
  25. Leow, R. P., "A study of the role of awareness in foreign language behavior : Aware vs. unaware learners", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, pp.557~584 (2000)
  26. Lightbown, P. M., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition", pp.114~138 (1998), Cambridge University Press
  27. Lightbown, P. M., "Focus on form and corrective feedback in communicative language teaching : Effects on second language learning", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12, pp.429~446 (1990)
  28. Nagata, N., "Intelligent computer feedback for second language instruction", The Modern Language Journal, 77, pp.330~339 (1993)
  29. Norris, J., "Effectiveness of L2 Instruction : A research synthesisand quantitative meta-analysis", Language Learning, 50, pp.417~428 (2000)
  30. Reber, A. S., "Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious" (1993), Oxford University Press
  31. Robinson, P., "Generalizability and automaticity of second language learning under implicit, incidental, enhanced, and instructed conditions", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, pp.223~247 (1997)
  32. Rosa, E. M., "Awareness, different learning conditions, and second language development", Applied Psycholinguistics, 17, pp.269~292 (2004)
  33. Rosa, E. M., "Explicitness, intake, and the issue of awareness", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, pp.551~556 (1999)
  34. Schachter, J., "Grammaticality judgments: Why does anyone object to subject extraction?", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 12(4), pp.379~392 (1990)
  35. Shaffer, C., "A comparison of inductive and deductive approaches to teaching foreign languages", Modern Language Journal, 73, pp.395~403 (1989)
  36. Skehan, P., "A framework for implementation of task-based instruction", Applied Linguistics, 17(1), pp.38~62 (1996)
  37. Spada, N., "Instruction and the development of questions in L2classrooms", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, pp.205~224 (1993)
  38. Spada, N., "Interactions between type of instruction and type of language feature : A meta-analysis", Language Learning, 60, pp.263~308 (2010)
  39. Vokey, J. R., "Salience of item knowledge in learning artificial grammars. Journal of Experimental Psychology : Learning", Memory and Cognition, 18, pp.328~344 (1992)
  40. Willis, J., "A framework for task-based learning" (1996), Longman

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)