The effects of direct error correction and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English article in EFL Contexts.
1
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) has long been a center of discussion inthe field of second language (L2) learning and there is now growing evidence which shows thatWCF contributes to the improvement of L2 accuracy. However, whether this improvementcomes from the acquisition of explicit knowledge (i.e., conscious and declarative knowledge)and/or implicit knowledge (i.e., intuitive and procedural knowledge) has been understudied. Forthis reason, the present study examined the effects of two types of WCF, direct correctivefeedback (DCF) and metalinguistic explanation (ME), on developing explicit and implicitknowledge of the English article. Fifty-four adult intermediate learners of English were dividedinto three groups (i.e., DCF, ME, and control groups) and the learners in the experimentalgroups received either DCF or ME during the treatment sessions. Error correction tests andpicture description tasks were employed to measure learners’ explicit and implicit knowledgerespectively. The study found that the learners in the experimental groups outperformed thecontrol group in both tests and the learners in the ME group surpassed the learners in the DCF. These findings highlight the role of WCF on the development of both explicit and implicitknowledge of the English article.
Abstract
The effectiveness of written corrective feedback (WCF) has long been a center of discussion inthe field of second language (L2) learning and there is now growing evidence which shows thatWCF contributes to the improvement of L2 accuracy. However, whether this improvementcomes from the acquisition of explicit knowledge (i.e., conscious and declarative knowledge)and/or implicit knowledge (i.e., intuitive and procedural knowledge) has been understudied. Forthis reason, the present study examined the effects of two types of WCF, direct correctivefeedback (DCF) and metalinguistic explanation (ME), on developing explicit and implicitknowledge of the English article. Fifty-four adult intermediate learners of English were dividedinto three groups (i.e., DCF, ME, and control groups) and the learners in the experimentalgroups received either DCF or ME during the treatment sessions. Error correction tests andpicture description tasks were employed to measure learners’ explicit and implicit knowledgerespectively. The study found that the learners in the experimental groups outperformed thecontrol group in both tests and the learners in the ME group surpassed the learners in the DCF. These findings highlight the role of WCF on the development of both explicit and implicitknowledge of the English article.
참고문헌 (43)
- Bitchener, J., "A reflection on"the language-learning-potential"of written CF", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, pp.348~363 (2012)
- Bitchener, J., "Evidence in support corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 17, pp.102~118 (2008)
- Bitchener, J., "Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing" (2012), Routledge
- Bitchener, J., "The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback", System, 37(2), pp.322~329 (2009)
- Bitchener, J., "The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development : A ten month investigation", Applied Linguistics, 31, pp.193~214 (2010)
- Bitchener, J., "Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2writers with written corrective feedback", Journal of Second Language Writing, 19, pp.207~217 (2010)
- Bitchener, J., "The effectiveness of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 14, pp.191~205 (2005)
- Chandler, J., "The efficacy of various kinds of error correction for improvement of the accuracy and fluency of L2 student writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, pp.267~296 (2003)
- Carroll, S., "Input and evidence : The raw material of second language acquisition" (2000), John Benjamins
- 조혜원, "Relative Effects of Prompts and Recasts on the Development of Implicit and Explicit L2 Knowledge", 영어교육, 67(4), pp.57~79 (2012), 한국영어교육학회
- DeKeyser, R., "Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition" (1998), Cambridge University Press
- Ellis, N., "Implicit and explicit learning of language", pp.1~31 (1994), Academic Press
- Ellis, R., "Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency : The differential contribution of implicit and explicit knowledge", Applied Linguistics, 27, pp.431~463 (2006)
- Ellis, R., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.31~64 (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Ellis, R., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.303~332 (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Ellis, R., "The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context", System, 36, pp.353~371 (2008)
- Erlam, R., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.65~94 (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Erlam, R., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.241~261 (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Ferris, D. R., "Feedback in second language writing: Contexts and issues", pp.81~104 (2006), Cambridge University Press
- Ferris, D. R., "Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be?", Journal of Second Language Writing, 10, pp.161~184 (2001)
- Heyer, S., "All new very easy true stories" (2006), Longman
- Hulstijn, J. H., "Attention and awareness in foreign language learning", pp.359~386 (1995), University of Hawaii
- 장성수, "Types of Information in Written Corrective Feedback and Its Efficacy on L2 Acquisition", 영어교육, 67(3), pp.3~25 (2012), 한국영어교육학회
- 김지현, "Learner Uptake and Perception of Recasts", 영어교육, 66(2), pp.3~21 (2011), 한국영어교육학회
- Krashen, S., "Principles and practice in second language acquisition" (1982), Pergamon
- Loewen, S., "Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching", pp.262~280 (2009), Multilingual Matters
- Master, P., "Information structure and English article pedagogy", System, 30, pp.331~348 (2002)
- Pica, T., "Methods of morpheme qualification : Their effect on the interpretation of second language data", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, pp.69~78 (1983)
- Robb, T., "Salience of feedback on error and its effect on EFL writing quality", TESOL Quarterly, 20, pp.83~93 (1986)
- Schmidt, R., "The role of consciousness in second language learning", Applied Linguistics, 11, pp.129~158 (1990)
- Schmidt, R., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.3~32 (2001), Cambridge University Press
- Semke, H., "The effects of the red pen", Foreign Language Annals, 17, pp.195~202 (1984)
- Sheen, Y., "The effect of focused written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles", TESOL Quarterly, 41, pp.255~283 (2007)
- Shintani, N., "The comparative effect of direct written corrective feedback and metalinguistic explanation on learners’ explicit and implicit knowledge of the English indefinite article", Journal of Second Language Writing, 22, pp.286~306 (2013)
- Kormos, J., "The role of individual differences in L2 writing", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21, pp.390~403 (2012)
- Truscott, J., "The case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes", Language Learning, 46, pp.327~369 (1996)
- Truscott, J., "The case for ‘the case against grammar correction in L2 writing classes’ : A response to Ferris", Journal of Second Language Writing, 8, pp.111~122 (1999)
- Truscott, J., "The effect of error correction on learners’ ability to write accurately", Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), pp.255~272 (2007)
- Truscott, J., "Some thoughts on Anthony Bruton’s critique of the correction debate", System, 38(2), pp.329~335 (2010)
- van Beuningen, C., "The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learners’ written accuracy", ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156, pp.279~296 (2008)
- van Beuningen, C., "Evidence on the effectiveness of comprehensive error correction in second language writing", Language Learning, 62(1), pp.1~41 (2012)
- Williams, J., "The potential role(s)of writing in second language development", Journal of Second Language Writing, 21(4), pp.321~331 (2012)
- Young, R., "Second language acquisition and linguistic variation", pp.135~175 (1996), John Benjamins