본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Structure of Causative Verb Complements in English

1

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Abstract

The Structure of Causative Verb Complements in EnglishHwang, Kyu-HongGiven that little attention has been paid to the syntactic aspects of Causative Verb Complements (CVCs) in English, this paper aims to examine various syntactic phenomena of such CVCs from a generative perspective. In particular, it lays focus on their constituency, category, and case valuation of their DP subjects.It has been claimed that the CVC of [DP, VP] is a single unit and the DP is the subject of the CVC. Supporting evidence for this claim comes from many syntactic facts: coordination facts, binding phenomena, the behaviors of subject-oriented idioms and adjuncts, the occurrence of expletives, facts about the floating emphatic reflexive, not-initial DPs, and alone-final DPs. After arguing against previous CP and VP analyses of the CVC, I have proposed that CVCs are clausal constituents with the category of TP whose head T is defective, laking ∮-complete in the sense of minimalist syntax. With respect to the case valuation of the CVC subject, it has been stressed that the overt subject is an active Goal but cannot be valued by the Tdef of the CVC under Chomsky’s (1995, 2000, 2001, 2005) Agree Theory. Then, the subject has been said to agree with the matrix light verb v and receive an accusative case value, as in typical ECM constructions.

참고문헌 (25)

  1. Berlin, "Small Clauses in English", the(n-verbal types) (1992), Aarts
  2. Baker, "A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing The University of Chicago Press" (1988), Incorporation
  3. Chomsky,N, "Lectures on Government and Binding" (1981), Foris
  4. "The Minimalist Program" (1995), MIT Press
  5. Martin, "Minimalist Inquiries: The Framework.Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik", pp.89~156 (2000), MIT Press
  6. Kenstowicz, M, "Derivation by Phase: A Life in Language", pp.1~52 (2001), MIT Press
  7. "On Phase" (2005), MIT
  8. Dixon, "A New Approach to English Grammar" (1991), On Semantic Principles Calrendon Press
  9. Emonds,J, "A Transformational Approach to English Syntax" (1976), Academic Press
  10. Felser, C, "Verbal Complement Clauses: A Minimalist Study of Direct Perception Constructions" (1999), John Benjamins
  11. Gee, "Comments on the Paper by Akmajian", pp.461~481 (1977), In Culicover et al Academic Press
  12. Gilquin,G, "Causative get and have", 31, pp.125~148 (2003)
  13. Giv, "English Grammar" (1993), John Benjamins
  14. Hwang, K.-H, "Small Clauses in English: Their Constituency and Category", 5, pp.111~129 (2001)
  15. "The Syntax of the Infinitival Perception Verb Complement in English", 44, pp.705~730 (2002)
  16. "The Syntax of the Participial Perception Verb Complement in English", 35, pp.141~165 (2004)
  17. Marantz, "On the Nature of Grammatical Relations" (1984), MIT Press
  18. Mittwoch,A, "On the Distribution of Bare Infinitive Complements in English", 26, pp.103~131 (1990)
  19. Napoli, "A Case Study of Indexing Theory" (1989), Cambridge University Press
  20. Radford,A, "Transformational Grammar" (1988), Cambridge University Press
  21. "Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach" (1997), Cambridge University Press
  22. "English Syntax: An Introduction" (2004), Cambridge University Press
  23. "The Function of Have", 101, pp.295~321 (1997)
  24. Stowell,T, "Subject Across Categories", 2, pp.285~312 (1983)
  25. Wierzbicka,A, "The Semantics of Grammar" (1988), John Benjamins

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)