율과 청규의 관계에 대한 고찰
A Study on the relationship between rules of the Buddhist order and Chunggyu
1
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Chogye Order, the authentic traditional Korean Buddhist Order, has the problem of how to set up the three kinds of rules within their categories; Vinaya(律, rules of Buddha) which has been passed down since the period of Buddha, Chunggyu(淸規, rules of discipline) which have settled down in the image of Zen Buddhism, and Jonghun Jongbup(宗憲宗法, the prime laws and regulations of the Order) which was established for the practical administration of the Order. It is focused on the matter whether to overcome the difference of the both historical and cultural traits between vinaya established in India and Chunggyu organized in China. In the current process of Buddhist Initiation Rituals『 The Vinaya in Four Parts』(四分律) is regard as the essence. And in the various types of practicing places, the process is accomplished according to the basis of Cheonggyu, the rule which is made on special purpose. In addition, all about the operation and the bylaw of a temple are based on Jonghun Jongbup. In the situation that Vinaya, Chunggyu and Jonghun Jongbup make the threefolded structure, how to establish the relationship among them is a very important matter. We can see the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu as independent On the other hand, as Vinaya and Chunggyu are regarded as having independent relationships, different cultures and historic traits, they are established to meet the realistic point of view. In this way, in establishing the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu two different aspects are included, one is the viewpoint that Chunggyu followed the spirit of Vinaya and the other is that they have independent and legislative nature. This is a different problem in that the relationships of the three should be established not by the simple succession or independence but by the hierarchically superior and inferior. However, as far as I am concerned, although Vinaya and Chunggyu have been developed in the different situation of time and historical background, they have the nature of both independent and legislative. Above all, the common point of the two is that they were practiced to make the harmonious Order and to lead a suitable and smooth life in Zen Center. Judging from these points, the opinions that Chunggyu succeeds Vinaya or Vinaya and Chunggyu should be viewed from the different point of view are not fair in the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu . All rules and regulations inevitably made based on the situation of the time. The on going Chunggyu should also be established within the category of these frame. The spirit of the rules set up in those days of Buddha should not be excluded nor should they be the unrealistic system and rules for the life in Zen Center. When a new Chunggyu which is based on the current situation of Chogye Order and the spirit of the Vinaya, a new standard making the tradition of the religious Order will be made.
Abstract
The Chogye Order, the authentic traditional Korean Buddhist Order, has the problem of how to set up the three kinds of rules within their categories; Vinaya(律, rules of Buddha) which has been passed down since the period of Buddha, Chunggyu(淸規, rules of discipline) which have settled down in the image of Zen Buddhism, and Jonghun Jongbup(宗憲宗法, the prime laws and regulations of the Order) which was established for the practical administration of the Order. It is focused on the matter whether to overcome the difference of the both historical and cultural traits between vinaya established in India and Chunggyu organized in China. In the current process of Buddhist Initiation Rituals『 The Vinaya in Four Parts』(四分律) is regard as the essence. And in the various types of practicing places, the process is accomplished according to the basis of Cheonggyu, the rule which is made on special purpose. In addition, all about the operation and the bylaw of a temple are based on Jonghun Jongbup. In the situation that Vinaya, Chunggyu and Jonghun Jongbup make the threefolded structure, how to establish the relationship among them is a very important matter. We can see the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu as independent On the other hand, as Vinaya and Chunggyu are regarded as having independent relationships, different cultures and historic traits, they are established to meet the realistic point of view. In this way, in establishing the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu two different aspects are included, one is the viewpoint that Chunggyu followed the spirit of Vinaya and the other is that they have independent and legislative nature. This is a different problem in that the relationships of the three should be established not by the simple succession or independence but by the hierarchically superior and inferior. However, as far as I am concerned, although Vinaya and Chunggyu have been developed in the different situation of time and historical background, they have the nature of both independent and legislative. Above all, the common point of the two is that they were practiced to make the harmonious Order and to lead a suitable and smooth life in Zen Center. Judging from these points, the opinions that Chunggyu succeeds Vinaya or Vinaya and Chunggyu should be viewed from the different point of view are not fair in the relationship between Vinaya and Chunggyu . All rules and regulations inevitably made based on the situation of the time. The on going Chunggyu should also be established within the category of these frame. The spirit of the rules set up in those days of Buddha should not be excluded nor should they be the unrealistic system and rules for the life in Zen Center. When a new Chunggyu which is based on the current situation of Chogye Order and the spirit of the Vinaya, a new standard making the tradition of the religious Order will be made.
참고문헌 (31)
- 강문선, "계율과 청규의 관계에서 본 현대 한국의 선원청규", 한국불교학, 46, pp.221~247 (2006), 한국불교학회
- 宗眞, "율장과 청규『」禪院淸規 편찬을 위한 학술세미나", pp.57~68 (2007), 조계종교육원 불학연구소
- 최법혜는, "선종청규에 대한 총설", 승가교육, 5 (2004), 대한불교조계종 교육원
- 향해, "청규는 제2의 율장인가", 불교평론, 32, pp.187~207 (2007), 불교시대사
- "『 佛垂般涅槃略說敎誡經』 『( 大正藏』 12, 120c), “…… 戒爲第一安穩功德之所住處”", ~
- 이자랑, "율장을 통해 본 승단과 현대사회의 조화", 한국불교학, 45, pp.165~ (2006), 한국불교학회
- "『 四分律』 권1『( 大正藏』22, 567b), “稽首禮諸佛 及法比丘僧 今演毘尼法 令正法久住”", ~
- 허훈, "청규에서의 생활문화연구", 박사
- "『 勅修百丈淸規』 권8『( 大正藏』48, 1157c), “百丈大智禪師以禪宗肇 自少室至曹溪以來多居律寺 雖別院然於 說法住持 未合規度”", ~
- "『 祖庭事苑』 권8『( 卍續藏經』113, 117c), “自達磨來梁隱居魏地 六祖相?至於大寂之世凡二百五十餘年末有 禪居洪州百丈大智禪師懷海方?意 不拘大小乘折中於經律法以設制範”", ~
- 정성본, "禪의 역사와 禪思想", pp.335~ (1994), 삼원사
- "「 禪門規式『」景德傳燈錄』 권6『( 大正藏』48, 18a), “師曰吾所宗 非局大小乘 非異大小乘 當搏約折中 設於制範 務其宜也 於是創意 別立禪居”", ~
- "『 四分律』권54『( 大正藏』22, 9671b), “若佛先所不制 今不應制 佛先所制 今不應却 應隨佛所制而學 時卽共 立如此制限”", ~
- "『 百丈淸規證義記』卷首 『( 卍續藏經』111, 591a), “四分律云 是佛所制者不應却 非佛所制者不應却 凡此皆淸 規之義 百丈重集之義”", ~
- "『 四分律』권12『( 大正藏』22, 641b), “若比丘自手掘地若敎人掘者波逸提”", ~
- "「 禪門規式『」景德傳燈錄』 권6 『( 大正藏』51, 251a), “行普請法 上下均力也”", ~
- 정성, "중국선종의 성립사연구", pp.787~ (1993), 민족사
- 伽山智冠 著, "한국불교계율전통", pp.121~ (2005), 가산불교문화연구원
- 鏡島元隆, "百丈淸規の成立とその意義, 禪硏究所紀要", pp.123~ (1976), 愛知學院禪硏究所
- 伽山智冠 著, "한국불교계율전통", pp.124~ (2005)
- "「 古淸規序『」勅修百丈淸規』권8 『( 大正藏』48, 1157c),“茶居律寺 雖別院然於說法住持未合規度 故常 爾介懷", ~
- "『 禪苑淸規』『( 卍續藏經』111권, 875a), “夫禪門事例 雖無兩樣毘尼 衲子家風 別是一般規範”", ~
- 黃奎, "禪宗淸規: 中國佛敎의 制度倫理『」불교계단의 성립과 전개", pp.83~ (2007), 동아시아불교문화학회
- 최법혜, "선종청규에 대한 총설", 승가교육, 5, pp.160~ (2004), 대한불교조계종 교육원
- 宗眞, "律藏과 淸規", 禪院淸規 편찬을 위한 학술 세미나, pp.61~ (2007), 대한불교조계종 교육원
- "『 五分律』권22 『( 大正藏』22권, 153a), “雖是我所制 而於餘方不以爲淸淨者 皆不應用雖非我 所制 而於餘方必應行者 皆不得不行”", ~
- "『 百丈淸規證義記』권1, 『( 卍續藏經』111권, 591c-592a),“", ~
- 향해, "청규는 제2의 율장인가", 불교평론, 9(3), pp.190~ (2007)
- "「 古淸規序『」勅修百丈淸規』권8, 『( 大正藏』48, 1158a), “不立佛殿 唯樹法堂者”", ~
- 신공, "율장과 청규에서의 육식과 채식의 문제", 보조사상, 28, pp.20~ (2007), 보조사상연구원
- "『 佛祖統紀』권33 『( 大正藏』49, 323a), “此方言五辛 當云???大蒜小蒜”", ~
