과업 중 압박과 비압박 계획이 영어 말하기와 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향
The effects of on-line pressured and unpressured planning on speaking and writing task performance
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study aimed to investigate the effects of on-line pressured and unpressured planning on the performance of speaking and writing tasks. Fifty Korean university students, who were learning English as a foreign language, were required to complete both oral and written tasks under pressured and unpressured planning conditions. In the pressured planning condition, participants were given 1 minute for the speaking task and 8 minutes for the writing task, while they could take as much time as they wanted in the unpressured condition. The main findings revealed that, unlike pressured planning time, unpressured planning time resulted in increased complexity in the performance of the writing task, but it did not have a significant effect on the speaking task performance. Furthermore, the unpressured planning time generally had a more positive impact on writing performance compared to speaking performance. The findings suggest that both pressured and unpressured planning conditions can influence English speaking and writing performance, and this influence may be vary depending on the language mode (speaking or writing).(168 words)
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of on-line pressured and unpressured planning on the performance of speaking and writing tasks. Fifty Korean university students, who were learning English as a foreign language, were required to complete both oral and written tasks under pressured and unpressured planning conditions. In the pressured planning condition, participants were given 1 minute for the speaking task and 8 minutes for the writing task, while they could take as much time as they wanted in the unpressured condition. The main findings revealed that, unlike pressured planning time, unpressured planning time resulted in increased complexity in the performance of the writing task, but it did not have a significant effect on the speaking task performance. Furthermore, the unpressured planning time generally had a more positive impact on writing performance compared to speaking performance. The findings suggest that both pressured and unpressured planning conditions can influence English speaking and writing performance, and this influence may be vary depending on the language mode (speaking or writing).(168 words)
참고문헌 (27)
- 박영목, "작문의 인지적 과정에 영향을 미치는 요인", 작문연구, (16), pp.231~257 (2012), 한국작문학회
- 주미진, "과업 계획이 EFL 학습자의 쓰기 수행에 미치는 영향", 영어교육연구, 33(3), pp.103~117 (2021), 팬코리아영어교육학회[DOI]
- Ahmadian, M. J., "The effects of simultaneous use of careful online planning and task repetition on accuracy, fluency, and complexity of EFL learners’ oral production", Language Teaching Research, 15, pp.35~59 (2011)
- Ahmadian, M. J., "The combined effects of online planning and task structure on complexity, accuracy, and fluency of L2 speech", Language Learning Journal, 43(1), pp.41~56 (2015)
- Bygate, M., "Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching and testing", pp.1~20 (2001), Pearson Education Limited
- Crookes, G., "Planning and interlanguage variation", Studies Language Acquisition, 11(4), pp.367~383 (1989)
- Ellis, R., "Planning and task performance in a second language", pp.167~192 (2005), John Benjamins
- Ellis, R., "The effects of planning and fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26(1), pp.59~84 (2004)
- Foster, P., "The influence of planning and task type on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18(3), pp.299~323 (1996)
- Ghavamnia, M., "The effect of pre-task and online planning conditions on complexity, accuracy, and fluency on EFL learners’ written production", Porta Linguarum, 20, pp.31~43 (2012)
- Hulstijn, J., "Grammatical errors as a function of processing constraints and explicit knowledge", Language Learning, 34, pp.23~43 (1984)
- 주미진, "Effects of Pre-task and On-line Planning on Complexity, Fluency, and Accuracy in Computer-based English Speaking and Writing Tests", 영어학, 22, pp.938~956 (2022), 한국영어학회[DOI]
- 김나영, "The Effects of Online Planning on CAF in L2 Spoken and Written Performance", 영어교육, 73(3), pp.3~28 (2018), 한국영어교육학회[DOI]
- Ochs, E., "Syntax and semantics 12: Discourse and syntax", pp.51~80 (1979), Academic Press
- Ortega, L., "Planning and focus on form in L2 oral performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21(1), pp.108~148 (1999)
- Skehan, P., "Modelling second language performance : Integrating complexity, accuracy, fluency, and lexis", Applied Linguistics, 30(4), pp.510~532 (2009)
- Skehan, P., "The influence of task structure and processing conditions on narrative retellings", Language Learning, 49(1), pp.93~120 (1999)
- Skehan, P., "Planning and task performance in a second language", pp.239~273 (2001), John Benjamins
- Skehan, P., "Cognition and second language instruction", pp.183~205 (2005), Cambridge University Press
- Tarone, E., "Variability in interlanguage use : A study of style-shifting in morphology and syntax", Language Learning, 35(3), pp.373~405 (1985)
- Levelt, W., "Neurocognition of language", pp.83~122 (1999), Oxford University Press
- Levelt, W. J., "Speaking: From intention to articulation" (1989), The MIT press
- Mehnert, U., "The effects of different lengths of time for planning on second language performance", Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20(1), pp.83~108 (1998)
- Wendel, J. N., "Planning and second language narrative production", doctor, pp.1997
- Wigglesworth, G., "An investigation of the effectiveness and validity of planning time in speaking test tasks", Language Assessment Quarterly, 7(1), pp.1~24 (2010)
- Wolfe-Quintero, K., "Second language development in writing: measures of fluency, accuracy, and complexity" (1998), University of Hawaii Press
- Yuan, F., "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production", Applied Linguistics, 24(1), pp.1~27 (2003)