본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Articulating and Silencing “Misery”: Against the Insensitive Culture of Sensibility in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류영어와문학

초록

Despite the rich history of the employment of the term “misery” in literary representation, authors of novels of sensibility have conveyed the term restricted to the demonstration of misfortune of sentimental heroines. As the eligibility of women writers was contested in the 1790s when the cult of sensibility began to wane after the French Revolution, however, the term began to be resorted to in more periphrastic ways, often in separation from the broken-hearted heroines. This article rethinks the gendered use of the term in the later novels of sensibility, revealing how the nuanced use of it can pave the way for the articulation of female narrative authority by tracing how the term is explored in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. The exploration of the novel’s engagement with the term provides insight into the way Austen establishes her narrative authority in the period when the culture of sensibility was contested, illuminating the ways in which Austen’s free indirect style shapes a particular kind of vigilant narrative voice that has a vision of sensible community. The sensible community explored in Sense and Sensibility attempts to strike a balance between variable sentiments of different bodies to resolve disparity of power distributed among genders created through conventional spectatorship. The novel locates the source of one’s sensibility in each specific body and questions the mechanism of watching and appropriating the feelings of other bodies rooted in the culture of spectatorship. Sense and Sensibility predicates sensibility on the individual body’s awakening to its leverage to produce or shatter spectacles.

Abstract

Despite the rich history of the employment of the term “misery” in literary representation, authors of novels of sensibility have conveyed the term restricted to the demonstration of misfortune of sentimental heroines. As the eligibility of women writers was contested in the 1790s when the cult of sensibility began to wane after the French Revolution, however, the term began to be resorted to in more periphrastic ways, often in separation from the broken-hearted heroines. This article rethinks the gendered use of the term in the later novels of sensibility, revealing how the nuanced use of it can pave the way for the articulation of female narrative authority by tracing how the term is explored in Jane Austen’s Sense and Sensibility. The exploration of the novel’s engagement with the term provides insight into the way Austen establishes her narrative authority in the period when the culture of sensibility was contested, illuminating the ways in which Austen’s free indirect style shapes a particular kind of vigilant narrative voice that has a vision of sensible community. The sensible community explored in Sense and Sensibility attempts to strike a balance between variable sentiments of different bodies to resolve disparity of power distributed among genders created through conventional spectatorship. The novel locates the source of one’s sensibility in each specific body and questions the mechanism of watching and appropriating the feelings of other bodies rooted in the culture of spectatorship. Sense and Sensibility predicates sensibility on the individual body’s awakening to its leverage to produce or shatter spectacles.

참고문헌 (22)

  1. Austen, Jane, "Mansfield Park" (2004), Barnes & Noble
  2. Austen, Jane, "Persuasion. 1818" (2008), Oxford UP
  3. Austen, Jane, "Pride and Prejudice. 1813" (1996), Signet
  4. Austen, Jane, "Sense and Sensibility. 1811" (2014), Vintage
  5. Barker-Benfield, G. J., "The Culture of Sensibility : Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain" (1992), U of Chicago P
  6. Benedict, Barbara M., "Framing Feeling: Sentiment and Style in English Prose Fiction 1745-1800" (1994), AMS
  7. Boyd, Brian, "Does Austen Need Narrators? Does Anyone?", New Literary History, 48, pp.285~308 (2017)
  8. Burney, Frances, "Camilla" (2009), Oxford UP
  9. Davidson, Jenny, "Reading Jane Austen" (2017), Cambridge UP
  10. Johnson, Claudia L., "Equivocal Beings: Politics, Gender, and Sentimentality in the 1790s" (1995), U of Chicago P
  11. Johnson, Claudia L., "A “Sweet Face as White as Death”: Jane Austen and the Politics of Female Sensibility", Novel: A Forum on Fiction, 22(2), pp.159~174 (1989)
  12. Lanser, Susan Sniader, "Fictions of Authority: Women Writers and Narrative Voice" (1992), Cornell UP
  13. Le Faye, Deirdre, "Jane Austen: The World of Her Novels" (2003), Frances Lincoln
  14. Milton, John, "Paradise Lost" (2004), Oxford UP
  15. O’Farrell, Mary Ann, "Telling Complexions: The Nineteenth-Century English Novel and the Blush" (1997), Duke UP
  16. Pinch, Adela, "Strange Fits of Passion: Epistemologies of Emotion, Hume to Austen" (1996), Stanford UP
  17. Richardson, Rebecca, "Dramatizing Intimacy: Confessions and Free Indirect Discourse in Sense and Sensibility", ELH, 81(1), pp.225~244 (2014)
  18. Richardson, Samuel, "Clarissa: Or the History of a Young Lady" (1986), Penguin
  19. Sedgwick, Eve Kosofsky, "Jane Austen and the Masturbating Girl", Critical Inquiry, 17, pp.818~837 (1991)
  20. Shakespeare, William, "The Tempest" (2002), Cambridge UP
  21. Wallace, Tara Ghoshal, "Jane Austen and Narrative Authority" (1995), Palgrave
  22. Wollstonecraft, Mary, "A Vindication of the Rights of Woman" (2009), Norton

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)