본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

An Empirical Analysis of Auditory Interfaces in Human-computer Interaction

0

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류컴퓨터학

초록

This study attempted to compare usability of auditory interfaces, which is a comprehensive concept that includes safety, utility, effectiveness, and efficiency, in personal computing environments: verbal messages (speech sounds), earcons (musical sounds), and auditory icons (natural sounds). This study hypothesized that verbal messages would offer higher usability than earcons and auditory icons, since the verbal messages are easy to interpret and understand based on semiotic process. In this study, usability was measured by a set of seven items: ability to inform what the program is doing, relevance to visual interfaces, degree of stimulation, degree of understandability, perceived time pressure, clearness of sound outputs, and degrees of satisfaction. Through the experimental research, the results showed that verbal messages provided the highest level of usability. On the contrary, auditory icons showed the lowest level of usability, as they require users to establish new coding schemes, and thus demand more mental effort from users.

Abstract

This study attempted to compare usability of auditory interfaces, which is a comprehensive concept that includes safety, utility, effectiveness, and efficiency, in personal computing environments: verbal messages (speech sounds), earcons (musical sounds), and auditory icons (natural sounds). This study hypothesized that verbal messages would offer higher usability than earcons and auditory icons, since the verbal messages are easy to interpret and understand based on semiotic process. In this study, usability was measured by a set of seven items: ability to inform what the program is doing, relevance to visual interfaces, degree of stimulation, degree of understandability, perceived time pressure, clearness of sound outputs, and degrees of satisfaction. Through the experimental research, the results showed that verbal messages provided the highest level of usability. On the contrary, auditory icons showed the lowest level of usability, as they require users to establish new coding schemes, and thus demand more mental effort from users.

참고문헌 (24)

  1. S.A. Brewster, "Providing a structured Method for integrating Non-speech Audio into Human-computer interfaces", 박사, pp.1994
  2. W. Buxton, "Tutorial number 8: The use of mon-speech audio at the interface", Processing of CHI’ 91. New orleans (1991), ACM Press: Addison-Wesley
  3. J. Preece, "Human-computer interaction" (1994), Addoson-Wesley
  4. C. Nass, "Does computer-generated speech manifest personality? An experimental test of similarityattraction", Proceedings of the CHI 2000 conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp.329~336 (2000)
  5. A. PappⅢ, "Dynamic presentation of Asynchronous auditory output", ACM Multimedia 96, pp.109~116 (1996)
  6. M. Blattner, "Earcon and icons: Their structure and common design principles", Human computer interaction, 4(1) (1989)
  7. S.A. Brewster, "Using compound earcons to represent hierarchies", HCI Letters, 1(1), pp.6~8 (1998)
  8. D.K. McGookin, "Understanding concurrent earcons: Applying auditory scene analysis principles to concurrent earcon recognition", ACM Transactions on Applied Perception (TAP) archive, 1(2), pp.130~155 (2004)
  9. S.A. Brewster, "The design and evaluation of an auditory-enhanced scrollbar", Proceedings of CHI'94, Boston, pp.173~179 (1994), ACM Press, Addison-Wesley
  10. S.A. Brewster, "The design and evaluation of a sonically enhanced tool palette", ACM Transactions on Applied Perception, 2(4), pp.455~461 (2005)
  11. M.G. Crease, "Making Progress With Sounds-The Design and Evaluation Of An Audio Progress Bar", Proceedings of ICAD'98 (1998), British Computer Society
  12. A.B. Barreto, "Impact of spatial auditory feedback on the efficiency of iconic human-computer interfaces under conditions of visual impairment", Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), pp.1211~1231 (2007)
  13. Providing a model for the use of sound in user interfaces, "S.A. Brewster", University of York, Department of Computer Science, ~, pp.Technical Report No. YCS 169 (1991)
  14. A. Dix, "Human- Computer Interaction" (1993), Prentice-Hall
  15. J. A. Jacko, "The identifiability of auditory icons for use in educational software for children", Interacting with Computers, 8(2), pp.121~133 (1996)
  16. D.K. Palladino, "Learning rates for auditory menus enhanced with spearcons versus earcons", Proceedings of the International Conference on Auditory Display (ICAD2007), pp.274~279 (2007)
  17. D. I. Rigas, "Communicating spatial information via a multimediaauditory interface", EUROMICRO Conference 1999, Proceedings 25th, 2, pp.398~405 (1999)
  18. E.D. Mynatt, "Designing with Auditory Icons", Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Auditory Display ICAD 94 (1994), Santa Fe Institute
  19. C. Peirce, "Philosophical Writings of Peirce" (1955), Dover
  20. U. Eco, "A theory of Semiotics" (1979), Indiana University Press
  21. F. Rossi-Landi, "Linguistics and economics" (1975), Mouton
  22. Y. Nam, "Semiotic analysis of sounds in personal computers: Toward a semiotic model of humancomputer interaction", Semiotica, 182(1, pp.4) (2010), 269~284
  23. B. Reeves, "The Media Equation" (1996), Cambridge University Press
  24. NASA Human performance research Group, "Task load index. V 1.0 Computerized version", NASA Arnes Resarch Center, ~ (1987)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)