Text Classification for Patents: Experiments with Unigrams, Bigrams and Different Weighting Methods
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Patent classification is becoming more critical as patent filings have been increasing over the years. Despite comprehensive studies in the area, there remain several issues in classifying patents on IPC hierarchical levels. Not only structural complexity but also shortage of patents in the lower level of the hierarchy causes the decline in classification performance. Therefore, we propose a new method of classification based on different criteria that are categories defined by the domain’s experts mentioned in trend analysis reports, i.e. Patent Landscape Report (PLR). Several experiments were conducted with the purpose of identifying type of features and weighting methods that lead to the best classification performance using Support Vector Machine (SVM). Two types of features (noun and noun phrases) and five different weighting schemes (TF-idf, TF-rf, TF-icf, TF-icf-based, and TF-idcef-based) were experimented on.
Abstract
Patent classification is becoming more critical as patent filings have been increasing over the years. Despite comprehensive studies in the area, there remain several issues in classifying patents on IPC hierarchical levels. Not only structural complexity but also shortage of patents in the lower level of the hierarchy causes the decline in classification performance. Therefore, we propose a new method of classification based on different criteria that are categories defined by the domain’s experts mentioned in trend analysis reports, i.e. Patent Landscape Report (PLR). Several experiments were conducted with the purpose of identifying type of features and weighting methods that lead to the best classification performance using Support Vector Machine (SVM). Two types of features (noun and noun phrases) and five different weighting schemes (TF-idf, TF-rf, TF-icf, TF-icf-based, and TF-idcef-based) were experimented on.
참고문헌 (32)
- "Guidelines for preparing patent landscape reports" (2015)[URL]
- K. Benzineb, "Automated patent classification, in ‘Current challenges in patent information retrieval’", pp.239~261 (2011), Springer Berlin Heidelberg
- C. Bielza, "Multi-dimensional classification with Bayesian networks", International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 52(6), pp.705~727 (2011)
- M. F. Caropreso, "Statistical phrases in automated text categorization" (2000), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- C. C. Chang, "Libsvm: a library for support vector machines", ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 2(3), pp.27~ (2011)
- E. D’hondt, "Text representations for patent classification", Computational Linguistics, 39(3), pp.755~775 (2013)
- G. Domeniconi, "A study on term weighting for text categorization: a novel supervised variant of tf. idf", Proceedings of the 4th international conference on data management technologies and applications (DATA). Candidate to the best conference paper award, pp.26~37 (2015)
- D. Eisinger, "Automated patent categorization and guided patent search using ipc as inspired by mesh and pubmed", Journal of biomedical semantics, 4(1), pp.1~ (2013)
- "University of Neuchatel: Stop word list, online" (2005)[URL]
- "Guide to the CPC" (2015)[URL]
- N. Fadaei, "Patent analysis and patent clustering for technology trend mining", HIER 2015- Proceedings des 9. Hildesheimer Evaluierungs- und Retrieval workshop, pp.77~86 (2015), Hildesheim University Hildesheim
- "Technology insight report slot machines" (2011)[URL]
- "Technology insight report robotic arms" (2012)[URL]
- "Contact lenses technology insight report" (2014)[URL]
- M. Hall, "The weka data mining software : an update", ACM SIGKDD explorations newsletter, 11(1), pp.10~18 (2009)
- C. W. Hsu, "A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines", IEEE transactions on Neural Networks, 13(2), pp.415~425 (2002)
- S. Ik Jae, "Patent management strategy using hierarchical clustering", Master, pp.2014
- C. H. Koster, "Phrase-based document categorization revisited", Proceedings of the 2nd international workshop on Patent information retrieval, pp.49~56 (2009), ACM
- C. H. Koster, "Current challenges in patent information retrieval", pp.263~286 (2011), Springer
- M. Lan, "Supervised and traditional term weighting methods for automatic text categorization", IEEE transactions on pattern analysis and machine intelligence, 31(4), pp.721~735 (2009)
- N. Oleg, "Eigennamenerkennung für technologien. implementierung und evaluierung eines prototyps für patente", Master, pp.2016
- L. Özgür, "Text classification with the support of pruned dependency patterns", Pattern Recognition Letters, 31(12), pp.1598~1607 (2010)
- 박찬정, "기계 학습을 이용한 특허 문서의 자동 IPC 분류", 한국정보기술학회논문지, 10(4), pp.119~128 (2012), 한국정보기술학회
- Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines, "J. Platt", ~ (1998)
- "Snowball: A language for stemming algorithms" (2001)[URL]
- A. Shmilovici, "Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery Handbook", pp.257~276 (2005), Springer
- "Understanding trends in the patent domain, in ‘IPaMin@ KONVENS’" (2014)[URL]
- K. Toutanova, "Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network", Proceedings of the 2003Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics on Human Language Technology, 1, pp.173~180 (2003), Association for Computational Linguistics
- Y. J. Tseng, "Text mining techniques for patent analysis", Information Processing & Management, 43(5), pp.1216~1247 (2007)
- (2013)[URL]
- D. Wang, "Inverse-category-frequency based supervised term weighting schemes for text categorization", Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 29(2), pp.209~225 (2013)
- "Patent Landscape Reports" (2016)[URL]