Subject Independent Classification of Implicit Intention Based on EEG Signals
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Brain computer interfaces (BCI) usually have focused on classifying the explicitly-expressed intentions of humans. In contrast, implicit intentions should be considered to develop more intelligent systems. However, classifying implicit intention is more difficult than explicit intentions, and the difficulty severely increases for subject independent classification. In this paper, we address the subject independent classification of implicit intention based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Among many machine learning models, we use the support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis kernel functions to classify the EEG signals. The Fisher scores are evaluated after extracting the gamma, beta, alpha and theta band powers of the EEG signals from thirty electrodes. Since a more discriminant feature has a larger Fisher score value, the band powers of the EEG signals are presented to SVM based on the Fisher score. By training the SVM with 1-out of-9 validation, the best classification accuracy is approximately 65% with gamma and theta components.
Abstract
Brain computer interfaces (BCI) usually have focused on classifying the explicitly-expressed intentions of humans. In contrast, implicit intentions should be considered to develop more intelligent systems. However, classifying implicit intention is more difficult than explicit intentions, and the difficulty severely increases for subject independent classification. In this paper, we address the subject independent classification of implicit intention based on electroencephalography (EEG) signals. Among many machine learning models, we use the support vector machine (SVM) with radial basis kernel functions to classify the EEG signals. The Fisher scores are evaluated after extracting the gamma, beta, alpha and theta band powers of the EEG signals from thirty electrodes. Since a more discriminant feature has a larger Fisher score value, the band powers of the EEG signals are presented to SVM based on the Fisher score. By training the SVM with 1-out of-9 validation, the best classification accuracy is approximately 65% with gamma and theta components.
참고문헌 (25)
- David Silver, "Mastering the Game Go with Deep Neural Networks and Tree Search", Nature, 529, pp.484~489 (2016)
- Y. LeCun, "Deep Learning", Nature, 521, pp.521~2015 (2015)
- P. Simon, "Too Big To Ignore: The Business case for Big Data" (2013), Wiley
- 오상훈, "Comparison of Objective Functions for Feed-forward Neural Network Classifiers Using Receiver Operating Characteristics Graph", International Journal of Contents, 10(1), pp.23~28 (2014), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- 오상훈, "Protein Disorder Prediction Using Multilayer Perceptrons", International Journal of Contents, 9(4), pp.11~15 (2013), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- C. W. Dawson, "Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks", Progress in Physical Geography, 25, pp.80~108 (2001)
- 오상훈, "Hydrological Modelling of Water Level near “Hahoe Village” Based on Multi-Layer Perceptron", International Journal of Contents, 12(1), pp.49~53 (2016), 한국콘텐츠학회[DOI]
- B. K. Kim, "Hierarchical Committee of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks for Robust facial Expression Recognition", J. Multimodal User Interfaces, 10(2), pp.173~189 (2016)
- Jonathan R. Wolpaw, "Brain-Computer Interfaces for Communication and Control", Clin. Neurophysiol, 113, pp.767~791 (2002)
- Benjamin Blankertz, "The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: EEG-based Communication without Subject Training", IEEE Trans. Neural Sys. and Rehabil, 14(2), pp.147~152 (2006)
- L. A. Farwell, "The truth Will Out:Interrogative Polygraphy (“Lie Detection”) with Eventrelated brain Potentials", Psychophysiology, 28, pp.531~547 (1991)
- C. Davatzikos, "Classifying Spatial Patterns of Brain Activity with Machine Learning Methods: Application to Lie Detection", Neuroimage, 28, pp.663~668 (2005)
- S. Y. Dong, "EEG-based Classification of Implicit Intention during Self-relevant Sentence Reading", IEEE Trans. Cybernetics
- S. Y. Dong, "Implicit Agreeing", Disagreeing Intention While Reading Selfrelevant Sentences: A Human fMRI Study, 2016, pp.11(3), 221~322
- E. Basar, "Event-related oscillations are ‘real brain responses’—Wavelet analysis and new strategies", Int. J. Psychophysiol, 39(2-3), pp.91~127 (2001)
- D. Roehm, "Fractionating Language Comprehension via Frequency Characteristics of the Human EEG", Neuroreport, 15(3), pp.409~412 (2004)
- L. A. Hald, "EEG Theta and gamma Responses to Semantic Violations in Online Sentence processing", Brain Lang, 96(1), pp.90~105 (2006)
- R. M. Willems, "Early Decreases in Alpha and Gamma Band Power Distinguish Linguistic from Visual Information during Spoken Sentence Comprehension", Brain Res, 1219, pp.78~90 (2008)
- Y. Luo, "Electroencephalogram oscillations differentiate semantic and prosodic processes during sentence reading", Neuroscience, 169(2), pp.654~664 (2010)
- J. N. Butcher, "The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 (MMPI-2): Manual for Administration and Scoring" (1989), University of Minnesota Press
- T. W. Lee, "A unifying information-theoretic framework for independent component analysis", Comput. Math. Appl, 39, pp.1~21 (2000)
- R. Duda, "Pattern Classification" (2001), Wiley-Interscience Publication
- C. M. Bishop, "Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning, Springer Science+Business Media" (2006), LLC
- C. C. Chang, "LIBSVM: A library for support vector machines", ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol, 2(3), pp.1~27 (2011)