An Analysis of Effective Factors in Public Awareness Campaigns through Facebook: Focus on Fine Dust Issues
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
In this study, we analyzed the factors that affect public awareness campaigns on social media platforms and developed an integrated model for measuring the persuasiveness of environmental social media campaigns. A survey questionnaire was created and distributed on Facebook with the goal of reaching individuals in their 20s and 40s in Vietnam, and 395 valid replies were gathered. The findings showed that the STOPS was reconfirmed as a suitable theoretical framework for analyzing the public's behaviour intention to conduct information related to the issue of fine dust, especially on social media. Furthermore, it also showed that social media efficacy has a moderating effect on the relationship between public’s situational recognition and informational behaviour intention. This suggested that through social media platforms, personal characteristics play a vital part in developing effective environmental campaigns. Implications for both theory and practice were discussed.
Abstract
In this study, we analyzed the factors that affect public awareness campaigns on social media platforms and developed an integrated model for measuring the persuasiveness of environmental social media campaigns. A survey questionnaire was created and distributed on Facebook with the goal of reaching individuals in their 20s and 40s in Vietnam, and 395 valid replies were gathered. The findings showed that the STOPS was reconfirmed as a suitable theoretical framework for analyzing the public's behaviour intention to conduct information related to the issue of fine dust, especially on social media. Furthermore, it also showed that social media efficacy has a moderating effect on the relationship between public’s situational recognition and informational behaviour intention. This suggested that through social media platforms, personal characteristics play a vital part in developing effective environmental campaigns. Implications for both theory and practice were discussed.
참고문헌 (25)
- "WHO" (2018)[URL]
- "IQAir" (2019)[URL]
- "EPI" (2014)[URL]
- "WHO" (2018)[URL]
- M. P. Vandenberg, "From smokestack to SUV : The individual as regulated entity in the new era of environmental law", Vanderbilt Law Review, 57(2), pp.515~535 (2004)
- K. S. Fielding, "Theory of planned behavior, identity and intentions to engage in environmental activism", Journal of Environmental Psychology, 28(5), pp.318~326 (2008)[DOI]
- B. Urien, "Generativity and self-enhancement values in eco-friendly behavioral intentions and environmentally responsible consumption behavior", Psychology & Marketing, 28(1), pp.69~90 (2011)[DOI]
- R. L. Holbert, "Environmental concern, patterns of television viewing, and proenvironmental behaviors : Integrating models of media consumption and effects", Journal of Broadcasting &Electronic Media, 47(2), pp.177~196 (2003)[DOI]
- T. Lowe, "Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change", Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), pp.435~457 (2006)[DOI]
- M. T. Boykoff, "Media and scientific communication : a case of climate change", Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 305(1), pp.11~18 (2008)[DOI]
- Anabela Carvalho, "Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re-reading news on climate change", Public Understanding of Science, 16(2), pp.223~243 (2007), SAGE Publications[DOI]
- M. Trolliet, "From Awareness to Action : Taking into Consideration the Role of Emotions and Cognition for a Stage toward a Better Communication of Climate Change", Addressing the Challenges in Communicating Climate Change across Various Audiences, pp.47~64 (2019), Springer
- T. Molodtsova, "Utilizing the social media data to validate 'climate change'indices", AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts (2013)
- A. Olteanu, "Comparing events coverage in online news and social media: The case of climate change", Ninth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media (2015)
- Jeong-Nam Kim, "Problem Solving and Communicative Action: A Situational Theory of Problem Solving", Journal of Communication, 61(1), pp.120~149 (2011), Oxford University Press (OUP)[DOI]
- J. N. Kim, "Information behaviors and problem chain recognition effect : Applying Situational Theory of Problem Solving in organ donation issue", Health Communication, 26(2), pp.171~184 (2011)[DOI]
- J. N. Kim, "What makes people hot : Applying the Situational Theory of Problem Solving to hot-Issue publics", Journal of Public Relations Research, 24, pp.144~164 (2012)[DOI]
- A. Bandura, "Self-efficacy : Toward a unify theory of behavioral change", Psychological Review, 84, pp.191~215 (1977)[DOI]
- N. E. Ch, "Social Media and Life Changes in Adolescence : Focusing on Social Media Literacy of Youth", presented at the Korean Society of Human Ecology Conference Papers Collection, pp.77~91 (2012)
- "Statista" (2021)[URL]
- S. H. Hong, "The Criteria for Selecting Appropriate Fit Indices in Structural Equation Modeling and Their Rationales", Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology, 19(1), pp.161~177 (2000)
- E. M. Mullen, "Mullen scales of early learning", pp.58~64 (1995), AGS
- S. A. Myers, "The relationship between perceived instructor communicator style, argumentativeness, and verbal aggressiveness", Communication Research Reports, 17(1), pp.1~12 (2000)[DOI]
- J. P. Wo, "Structural Equation Model Concept and Understanding" (2012), Hannarae Publishing Co
- 이민영, "위험인식의 낙관적 편견에 대한 프레임과 관여도의 역할", 한국언론정보학보, 48(4), pp.191~210 (2009), 한국언론정보학회