Personnel Manager Type (Human and AI) and Selection Process Satisfaction: Procedural Justice as a Moderator
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to investigate the satisfaction of personnel selection process according to type of personnel manager and to examine whether the relationship between the type of personnel manager and the satisfaction with the personnel selection process was moderated by the applicant's perception of procedural justice. This study was conducted using a between-group design with 208 students from a fouryear university in Korea. One group watched a video in which a human personnel manager selected employees and the other group watched a video in which an AI personnel manager selected employees. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition, responded to a demographic questionnaire, and answered measures of procedural justice and satisfaction with personnel selection after watching the video. As a result, the selection process satisfaction was significantly higher when the human personnel manager conducted the selection process than when the AI personnel manager conducted such process. In addition, when procedural justice was perceived as low, there was a significant difference in satisfaction between human and AI groups. However, when procedural justice was perceived as high, there was no significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups. Based on study results, the significance and limitations of this study and suggestions for future studies are discussed.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the satisfaction of personnel selection process according to type of personnel manager and to examine whether the relationship between the type of personnel manager and the satisfaction with the personnel selection process was moderated by the applicant's perception of procedural justice. This study was conducted using a between-group design with 208 students from a fouryear university in Korea. One group watched a video in which a human personnel manager selected employees and the other group watched a video in which an AI personnel manager selected employees. Participants were randomly assigned to a condition, responded to a demographic questionnaire, and answered measures of procedural justice and satisfaction with personnel selection after watching the video. As a result, the selection process satisfaction was significantly higher when the human personnel manager conducted the selection process than when the AI personnel manager conducted such process. In addition, when procedural justice was perceived as low, there was a significant difference in satisfaction between human and AI groups. However, when procedural justice was perceived as high, there was no significant difference in satisfaction between the two groups. Based on study results, the significance and limitations of this study and suggestions for future studies are discussed.
참고문헌 (33)
- "With the trend of non-face-to-face interviews spreading further…’Heating’ competition in the AI recruitment solution market" (2021)[URL]
- F. A. Miller, "The OD imperative to add inclusion to the algorithms of artificial intelligence", OD practitioner, 50, pp.6~12 (2018)
- J. H. Park, "Job interview agency service using robot pepper", Weekly ICT Trends, 1805, pp.43~44 (2017)
- R. D. Arvey, "Motivational components of test taking", Personnel Psychology, 43, pp.695~716 (1990)[DOI]
- S. L. Rynes, "The importance of recruitment in job choice: A different way of looking", Personnel psychology, 44, pp.487~521 (1991)[DOI]
- 김형식, "면접에 대한 지원자 지각이 면접만족도와 채용제안 수용가능성에 미치는 영향에 관한 실증적 연구", 경영학연구, 31(1), pp.1~16 (2002), 한국경영학회
- S. K. Ötting, "The importance of procedural justice in human–machine interactions: Intelligent systems as new decision agents in organizations", Computers in Human Behavior, 89, pp.27~39 (2018)[DOI]
- H. Y. Suen, "Does the use of synchrony and artificial intelligence in video interviews affect interview ratings and applicant attitudes?", Computers in Human Behavior, 98, pp.93~101 (2019)[DOI]
- 민지현, "A Comparative Study of Potential Job Candidates’ Perceptions of an AI Recruiter and a Human Recruiter", 한국융합학회논문지, 9(5), pp.191~202 (2018), 한국융합학회[DOI]
- Y. Acikgoz, "Justice perceptions of artificial intelligence in selection", International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 28, pp.399~416 (2020)[DOI]
- M. Langer, "Examining digital interviews for personnel selection : Applicant reactions and interviewer ratings", International journal of selection and assessment, 25, pp.371~382 (2017)[DOI]
- Macan, Therese Hoff, "The effects of applicants' reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center", Personnel Psychology, 47(4), pp.715~738 (1994)[DOI]
- J. W. Boudreau, "Role of recruitment in staffing utility analysis", Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, pp.354~366 (1985)[DOI]
- D. Potosky, "A conceptual framework for the role of the administration medium in the personnel assessment process", Academy of Management Review, 33, pp.629~648 (2008)[DOI]
- N. Blacksmith, "Technology in the employment interview: A meta-analysis and future research agenda", Personnel Assessment and Decisions, 2, pp.12~20 (2016)[DOI]
- M. Hengstler, "Applied artificial intelligence and trust-The case of autonomous vehicles and medical assistance devices", Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 105, pp.105~120 (2016)[DOI]
- 이환우, "채용 전형에서 인공지능 기술 도입이 입사 지원의도에 미치는 영향", 정보시스템연구, 28(2), pp.25~52 (2019), 한국정보시스템학회[DOI]
- N. Schmitt, "Applicant decisions in the employment interview", Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, pp.184~192 (1976)[DOI]
- G. N. Powell, "Effects of job attributes and recruiting practices on applicant decisions: A comparison", Personnel psychology, 37, pp.721~732 (1984)[DOI]
- 신나민, "대학입시 전형 AI 면접에 대한 고등학생의 인식", 한국산학기술학회논문지, 22(7), pp.242~251 (2021), 한국산학기술학회[DOI]
- T. H. Macan, "The effects of applicants' reactions to cognitive ability tests and an assessment center", Personnel Psychology, 47, pp.715~738 (1994)[DOI]
- 박효민, "공정성 이론의 다차원성", 사회와 이론, (27), pp.219~260 (2015), 한국이론사회학회
- E. A. Lind, "The social psychology of procedural justice" (1988), Springer Science & Business Media
- S. W. Gilliland, "Effects of procedural and distributive justice on reactions to a selection system", Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, pp.691~701 (1994)[DOI]
- M. S. Singer, "Procedural justice in managerial selection: Identification of fairness determinants and associations of fairness perceptions", Social Justice Research, 5, pp.49~70 (1992)[DOI]
- M. S. Singer, "Fairness in personnel selection" (1993), Avebury
- J. A. Colquitt, "On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure", Journal of applied psychology, 86, pp.386~400 (2001)[DOI]
- R. E. Ployhart, "Toward an explanation of applicant reactions: An examination of organizational justice and attribution frameworks", Organizational behavior and human decision processes, 72, pp.308~335 (1997)[DOI]
- J. W. Smither, "Applicant reactions to selection procedures", Personnel psychology, 46, pp.49~76 (1993)[DOI]
- D. D. Steiner, "Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States", Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, pp.134~141 (1996)[DOI]
- D. M. Truxillo, "Selection fairness information and applicant reactions: A longitudinal field study", Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, pp.1020~1031 (2002)[DOI]
- D. D. Steiner, "Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States", Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, pp.134~141 (1996)[DOI]
- 정원섭, "인공지능 알고리즘의 편향성과 공정성", 인간.환경.미래, (25), pp.55~73 (2020), 인간환경미래연구원[DOI]