《東醫寶鑑》 飜譯書에 대한 異見
Study on the translation of the Dong-uibogam 東醫寶鑑 in Korean version with a different view
0
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The 『Dong-uibogam(東醫寶鑑)』 is a Korean medical book which represents the Korean Oriental Medicine and compiled by the royal physician, Heo Jun. It was placed on UNESCO’s Memory of the World Programme in the year of 2009. It has been translated and published in Korean 7 times so far, and most of them depended on the liberal translation. This study has a purpose to investigate the Korean version in the view of Chinese writing grammar, and the results can be concluded as follows ;1. The Korean version shows insufficient translation of individual morpheme in the sentence which has the prepositions with the pronouns or the conjunctions. 2. Most of the versions failed to translate the syntax properties of the demonstrative pronoun; ‘之’ and ‘其’. 3. Some of the versions are not successful in the understanding of the constituent of sentence correctly. 4. Many of the adverbial phrases are not translated, which is the constituent of modifier in the sentence. 5. Some sentences are mistranslated by the paragraphs. 6. Some of them failed to understand the significances of the vocabularies.
Abstract
The 『Dong-uibogam(東醫寶鑑)』 is a Korean medical book which represents the Korean Oriental Medicine and compiled by the royal physician, Heo Jun. It was placed on UNESCO’s Memory of the World Programme in the year of 2009. It has been translated and published in Korean 7 times so far, and most of them depended on the liberal translation. This study has a purpose to investigate the Korean version in the view of Chinese writing grammar, and the results can be concluded as follows ;1. The Korean version shows insufficient translation of individual morpheme in the sentence which has the prepositions with the pronouns or the conjunctions. 2. Most of the versions failed to translate the syntax properties of the demonstrative pronoun; ‘之’ and ‘其’. 3. Some of the versions are not successful in the understanding of the constituent of sentence correctly. 4. Many of the adverbial phrases are not translated, which is the constituent of modifier in the sentence. 5. Some sentences are mistranslated by the paragraphs. 6. Some of them failed to understand the significances of the vocabularies.
참고문헌 (11)
- 許珉, "詳譯 東醫寶鑑", 東洋綜合通信大學敎育部, 175~320 (1964)
- 東醫寶鑑國譯委員會譯, "國譯增補東醫寶鑑", pp.1084~1213 (1966), 南山堂
- 具本泓, "한글 完譯本 東醫寶鑑", pp.1306~1440 (1977), 大衆書館
- 최창록, "완역 東醫寶鑑", pp.35~368 (2003), 푸른사상
- 趙憲泳, "東醫寶鑑", pp.2709~3045 (2005), 여강
- 東醫文獻硏究室, "東醫寶鑑", pp.3275~3571 (2005), 法仁文化史
- 윤석희, "對譯 東醫寶鑑", pp.1965~2211 (2005), 동의보감출판사
- 金元中, "虛詞辭典", pp.251~568 (1989), 玄岩社
- 中文大辭典編纂委員會, "中文大辭典", pp.369~14415 (1985), 中國文化大學出版部
- 요진우, "한문 문법의 분석적 이해", pp.35~384 (2001), 계명대학교출판부
- "東亞百年玉篇", pp.971~ (2006), 두산동아
