본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『醫貫·玄元膚論』에 대한 번역 연구

The Study of Translating 『Yiguan·Xuanyuanfulun』

0

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

Objective : Zhao Xian-Ke(趙獻可) was a doctor in the Ming(明) Dynasty. His representing book is Yiguan(醫貫). It is considered as a requirement to study the Mingmen academy(命門學說). 「Xuanyuanfulun(玄元膚論)」, volume I of Yiguan intensively mentions his medical viewpoint. The study investigates Zhao’s medical perspectives by studying 「Xuanyuanfulun」. Method : 「Xuanyuanfulun」 is translated. Yiguan published by Chinese Medicine(中國中醫藥)Publish was used as basis. Yiguan published by Xuexiao(學苑) Publish was used for reference. I checked and researched for several parts shown in Suwen(素問) and Lingshu(靈樞). I researched for ‘Master(主)’ of a human being. Result :1. ‘Master’ of a human being is intangible Huo(火) in Mingmen. 2. It may be hard for me to assent to the opinion of Zhao Xian-Ke that the inferior twelve organs should be regarded as inferior eleven organs naturally. 3. Yinyang(陰陽) is to relatively cope with a situation and its wonders are within Wu(無). 4. The study emphasizes the importance of Yang, Huo and Qi(氣). 5. The study separates the date (year, month, date and time) into yin and yang and the causes of an illness are found based on the concept and its treatment shall be performed. 6. Among Wuxing(五行), Shui(水) and Huo are especially important. 7. There are intangible Shenshui(腎水) and intangible Xianghuo(相火) separately from the Shui and huo of Xinshen(心腎). Conclusion : The medical philosophy of Zhao Xian-Ke has been deeper. In addition, it will provide much help while understanding volumes 2 – 6 of Yiguan and apply to the clinical tests. I think it is not the problem, which is the right meaning of ‘Master’ in the “Xin is monarch of the organs” of Suwen·Linglanmidianlun(靈蘭秘典論) or ‘Master’ that concerned by Zhao Xian-Ke, but it is just the different sight of the human being.

Abstract

Objective : Zhao Xian-Ke(趙獻可) was a doctor in the Ming(明) Dynasty. His representing book is Yiguan(醫貫). It is considered as a requirement to study the Mingmen academy(命門學說). 「Xuanyuanfulun(玄元膚論)」, volume I of Yiguan intensively mentions his medical viewpoint. The study investigates Zhao’s medical perspectives by studying 「Xuanyuanfulun」. Method : 「Xuanyuanfulun」 is translated. Yiguan published by Chinese Medicine(中國中醫藥)Publish was used as basis. Yiguan published by Xuexiao(學苑) Publish was used for reference. I checked and researched for several parts shown in Suwen(素問) and Lingshu(靈樞). I researched for ‘Master(主)’ of a human being. Result :1. ‘Master’ of a human being is intangible Huo(火) in Mingmen. 2. It may be hard for me to assent to the opinion of Zhao Xian-Ke that the inferior twelve organs should be regarded as inferior eleven organs naturally. 3. Yinyang(陰陽) is to relatively cope with a situation and its wonders are within Wu(無). 4. The study emphasizes the importance of Yang, Huo and Qi(氣). 5. The study separates the date (year, month, date and time) into yin and yang and the causes of an illness are found based on the concept and its treatment shall be performed. 6. Among Wuxing(五行), Shui(水) and Huo are especially important. 7. There are intangible Shenshui(腎水) and intangible Xianghuo(相火) separately from the Shui and huo of Xinshen(心腎). Conclusion : The medical philosophy of Zhao Xian-Ke has been deeper. In addition, it will provide much help while understanding volumes 2 – 6 of Yiguan and apply to the clinical tests. I think it is not the problem, which is the right meaning of ‘Master’ in the “Xin is monarch of the organs” of Suwen·Linglanmidianlun(靈蘭秘典論) or ‘Master’ that concerned by Zhao Xian-Ke, but it is just the different sight of the human being.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. 방정균, "《황제내경》의 심의 개념과 장상에 대한 연구", 석사, pp.2000
  2. 申興黙, "命門에 관한 文獻的 考察", 동의생리학회지, 7(1), pp.15~ (1992)
  3. 이용태, "命門에 對한 考察", 동의생리학회지, 3(2), pp.62~ (1988)
  4. 전학수, "道家의 氣穴과 韓醫學의 命門思想", 대한한의정보학회지, 14(2), pp.56~57 (2008)
  5. 정연미, "서자평 『낙록자삼명소식부주』의 명리학사적 연구", 석사, 동양철학, pp.2004
  6. 김남형, "萬波息笛 설화의 역사적 의미", 한국학논집, (38), pp.171~194 (2009), 한국학연구원
  7. 김경희, "맹자의 민본사상 연구", 석사, pp.2005
  8. 이기호, "공맹의 민본사상에 관한 고찰", 석사, pp.2005
  9. 진보성, "조식과 황종희의 민본정치사상에 대한 비교연구", 석사, pp.2007
  10. 안병철, "선진유가의 민본정치사상 연구", 박사, pp.2006
  11. 박명숙, "맹자 민본주의의 현대적 의의", 석사, pp.2007
  12. 장현근, "민(民)의 어원과 의미에 대한 고찰", 정치사상연구, 15(1), pp.131~157 (2009), 한국정치사상학회
  13. 李哲承, "유가의 민본 사상에 나타난 민주적 요소-황종희의 정치사상을 중심으로-", 東洋哲學, 20, pp.90~ (2003)
  14. 이경무, "군(君), 신(臣), 민(民)의 존재와 공자의 이상사회", 범한철학, 56(1), pp.33~60 (2010), 범한철학회
  15. 윤창열, "陰陽五行論의 本質과 內容에 관한 考察", 대한원전의사학회지, 6, pp.233~250 (1992)
  16. 윤창열, "河圖와 洛書에 나타난 陰陽五行에 關한 硏究", 8, pp.39~40 (1994)
  17. 박찬국, "陰陽과 五行의 關係", 대한원전의사학회지, 4, pp.16~ (1990)
  18. 은석민, "命門學說에 대한 知覺論적 해석", 대한한의학원전학회지, 24(6), pp.49~61 (2011), 대한한의학원전학회
  19. 李 華, "조헌가의 생애와 의학사상에 관한 연구", 석사, pp.1998
  20. 黃秉翰, "趙獻可의 學術思想에 關한 硏究 : 命門學說을 中心으로", 석사, pp.1993
  21. 정동혁, "趙獻可의 《醫貫》중 咳嗽論에 관한 硏究", 韓國醫史學會誌, 23(1), pp.67~75 (2010), 한국의사학회
  22. 趙獻可, "醫貫", pp.1~25 (2009), 中國中醫藥出版社
  23. 趙獻可, "醫貫", pp.3~28 (1996), 學苑出版社
  24. 홍원식, "中國醫學史", pp.249~ (1987), 東洋醫學硏究院
  25. 김용진, "各家學說", pp.311~318 (2001), 대성의학사
  26. 韓東錫, "宇宙變化의 原理", pp.31~92 (1993), 행림출판
  27. 박찬국, "(懸吐國譯)黃帝內經素問運氣七篇注釋", pp.349~559 (2009), 집문당
  28. 楊維傑, "黃帝內經靈樞譯解", pp.88~575 (1990), 大星文化社
  29. 楊維傑, "黃帝內經素問譯解", pp.8~701 (1990), 大星文化社
  30. 張介賓, "類經圖翼", pp.11~12 (1980), 人民衛生出版社
  31. 張介賓, "景岳全書·上", pp.5~6 (1988), 大星文化社
  32. 許浚, "原本 東醫寶鑑<新增版>", pp.339~468 (2004), 南山堂
  33. "周易(元)", pp.281~378 (1998), 學民文化社
  34. "周易(亨)", pp.386~387 (1998), 學民文化社
  35. "禮記(亨)", pp.144~ (2005), 學民文化社
  36. 李龍範, "韓國科學思想史硏究", pp.154~ (2009), 동국대학교출판부
  37. 존 헨더슨, "중국의 우주론과 청대의 과학혁명", pp.193~ (2004), 소명
  38. 한국사상사연구회, "조선유학의 개념들", pp.85~88 (2002), 예문서원
  39. "七政算內篇丁卯年交食假令"[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)