본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

內外・陰陽의 관점에서 본 韓醫學의 歷史

The history of oriental medicine at certain point of internal-external and Eumyang

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

The oriental medicine is not static knowledge. Since the publication of『Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)』 it has unceasingly changed and developed, that changes and developments ate the reflex of culture and civil progression, and they also are active acceptance of the time's demand. when we look back into the history of the Oriental medicine, angle of understanding disease can be classified into two concepts ; internal-external and Eumyang. Internal-external is whether we find the source of disease internal or external. Eumyang is deciding which is more important between yin-essence and yang-gi which are components of the essence-gi of body. This thesis view course of development of theory of the oriental medicine since publication of『Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)』 at certain point of internal-external and Eumyang and with those as background, will inquire into sameness and difference between the Korean medicine and the Chinese medicine, and provide an advanced course for the oriental medicine.

Abstract

The oriental medicine is not static knowledge. Since the publication of『Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)』 it has unceasingly changed and developed, that changes and developments ate the reflex of culture and civil progression, and they also are active acceptance of the time's demand. when we look back into the history of the Oriental medicine, angle of understanding disease can be classified into two concepts ; internal-external and Eumyang. Internal-external is whether we find the source of disease internal or external. Eumyang is deciding which is more important between yin-essence and yang-gi which are components of the essence-gi of body. This thesis view course of development of theory of the oriental medicine since publication of『Hwangjenaegyeong(黃帝內經)』 at certain point of internal-external and Eumyang and with those as background, will inquire into sameness and difference between the Korean medicine and the Chinese medicine, and provide an advanced course for the oriental medicine.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. 柯琴, "傷寒來蘇集", pp.193~ (1992), 일중사
  2. 裘沛然, "中醫歷代各家學說", pp.155~ (1984), 上海科學技術出版社
  3. 김중한, "朱震亨의 滋陰學說과 張介賓, 李奎晙의扶陽學說에 대한 비교연구", 동의대학교동의논집. 자연과학편, 20, pp.12~ (1993)
  4. "四部備要 第三十三冊", pp.808~ (1989), 中華書局
  5. 葉天士, "葉天士醫學全書", pp.341~342 (1999), 中國中醫藥出版社
  6. 葉天士, "臨証指南醫案", pp.188~189 (1997), 上海科學技術出版社
  7. 孫廣仁, "古代崇陰尊陽思想對中醫理論的影響", 山西中醫學院學報, 3(4), pp.4~ (2002), 山西中醫學院
  8. 楊佰峻, "春秋左傳注", pp.1221~1222 (2000), 中華書局
  9. 吳鞠通, "國譯溫病條辨", pp.49~ (2004), 集文堂
  10. 李中梓, "李中梓醫學全書", pp.81~ (1999), 中國中醫藥出版社
  11. 張元素, "醫學啓源", pp.16~17 (1985), 人民衛生出版社
  12. 張仲景, "新編仲景全書", pp.55~ (1993), 大星文化社
  13. 丁彰炫, "鬼神에 대한 『黃帝內經』의 입장", 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, 10(2), pp.85~ (1997)
  14. 丁彰炫, "東醫寶鑑和道家思想的关联性", 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, 20(2), pp.26~ (2007)
  15. 丁彰炫, "溫病條辨의 성립과정과 학술적 特徵", 大韓韓醫學原典學會誌, 16(1), pp.82~83 (2003)
  16. 趙獻可, "醫貫", pp.54~ (1982), 人民衛生出版社
  17. 陳鼓應, "莊子今注今譯", pp.80~ (1983), 中華書局
  18. 陳奇猷, "呂氏春秋校釋", pp.34~ (1995), 學林出版社
  19. 陳大舜, "各家學說", pp.8~9 (2001), 대성의학사
  20. 洪元植, "精校黃帝內經素問", pp.11~ (1981), 東洋醫學硏究院出版部
  21. 洪元植, "精校黃帝內經靈樞", pp.158~ (1985), 東洋醫學硏究院出版部
  22. 洪元植, "中國醫學史", pp.14~ (1984), 東洋醫學硏究院
  23. "欽定四庫全書 子部五 醫家類 12", pp.722~ (1995), 大星文化社
  24. "欽定四庫全書 子部五 醫家類 13", pp.132~ (1995), 大星文化社
  25. "欽定四庫全書 子部五 醫家類 14", pp.673~ (1995), 大星文化社
  26. "欽定四庫全書 子部五 醫家類 31", pp.446~ (1995), 大星文化社
  27. "欽定四庫全書 子部五 醫家類 44", pp.968~ (1995), 大星文化社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (19건)