본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

『脈經』․『脈訣』․『脈訣刊誤』의 비교를 통한 『脈訣』의 脈象에 대한 연구

Study on the definitions of pulses of Maekgyeol(脈訣) by comparison of Maekgyung(脈經) and Maekgyeol(脈訣) and Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤).

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류한의학

초록

Maekgyung(脈經) was the first book for diagnostic method in traditional Chinese medicine history, but it couldn't be spreaded widely. After that, Maekgyeol(脈訣) was widely spreaded for centuries, because it was more concise and easier to memorize than Maekgyung. But as time went by, people got to know that Maekgyeol had many errors. After Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤) corrected the errors of Maekgyeol, Maekgyeol came to lose its reputation and people began to study Binhomaekhak(瀕湖脈學) instead of Maekgyeol. We got to wonder why Maekgyeol was criticized by many people, so we decided to compare the definitions of pulses(脈象) in Maekgyung and Maekgyeol and Maekgyeolganoh. Both Maekgyung and Maekgyeol have 24 kinds of pulses, but 22 kinds are in common. In 22 kinds of pulses, only 2 kinds of definitions are similar and the others are different. And Maekgyeolganoh criticized errors of Maekgyeol and corrected the definitions by that of Maekgyung. In conclusion, we come to know that Maekgyeol was rejected by people because it defined most of pulses different from Maekgyung.

Abstract

Maekgyung(脈經) was the first book for diagnostic method in traditional Chinese medicine history, but it couldn't be spreaded widely. After that, Maekgyeol(脈訣) was widely spreaded for centuries, because it was more concise and easier to memorize than Maekgyung. But as time went by, people got to know that Maekgyeol had many errors. After Maekgyeolganoh(脈訣刊誤) corrected the errors of Maekgyeol, Maekgyeol came to lose its reputation and people began to study Binhomaekhak(瀕湖脈學) instead of Maekgyeol. We got to wonder why Maekgyeol was criticized by many people, so we decided to compare the definitions of pulses(脈象) in Maekgyung and Maekgyeol and Maekgyeolganoh. Both Maekgyung and Maekgyeol have 24 kinds of pulses, but 22 kinds are in common. In 22 kinds of pulses, only 2 kinds of definitions are similar and the others are different. And Maekgyeolganoh criticized errors of Maekgyeol and corrected the definitions by that of Maekgyung. In conclusion, we come to know that Maekgyeol was rejected by people because it defined most of pulses different from Maekgyung.

참고문헌 (7)

  1. 홍원식, "중국의학사", pp.200~201 (2001), 일중사
  2. 廖育群, "중국과학기술사", pp.590~591 (2003), 일중사
  3. 高文鑄, "醫經病源診法名著集成", pp.506~ (1997), 華夏出版社
  4. 高爾鑫, "汪石山醫學全書", pp.19~31 (1999), 中國中醫藥出版社
  5. 李時珍, "國譯 瀕湖脈學·四言擧要", pp.5~209 (1992), 대성의학사
  6. 韓醫學大辭典編纂委員會, "韓醫學大辭典(基礎理論編)", pp.137~206 (1989), 東洋醫學硏究院出版部
  7. 高大民族文化硏究所 中國語大辭典編纂室, "中韓辭典", 高大民族文化硏究院, 2764~ (2001)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (11건)