明堂臟腑圖에서 기원한 肝臟圖 29종의 비교
Comparison of 29 Diagrams of Liver originated from Mingtangzangfutu(明堂臟腑圖)
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives : The goal of this paper is to research what affected diagrams of liver originated from Mingtangzangfutu while they were changed. Methods : Diagrams of liver in Traditional Chinese and Japanese medical books had been gathered as many as possible. After they were divided into ones which were originated from Mingtangzangfutu and the others, diagrams originated from Mingtangzangfutu, were again classified into 4 filiations according to Huang Longxiang(黃龍祥)’s standard. Apart from his classification, they were analysed by 4 form factors, e.g. shape, number, veins and petiole of leafs. Results : Reliability of this methods had been confirmed by the correspondence with Huang’s 14 standard books, before 29 diagrams of liver were derived from 33 books including 13 books that Huang had already suggested. The lobes of liver in most of diagrams resembled 7 lanceolate or long oval leafs, or a maple leaf with 6 indentations, 4 left lobes and right 3 ones. In most of diagrams, veins of leafs were described variously, and petioles of leafs were drawn more shortly or longer. Analysing 29 diagrams by 4 form factors proved that Huang’s classification had crossing features among 4 filiations. This phenomenon implied the painters or doctors drawing diagrams might not convince if the shape of liver was correct or not. Although veins and petiole of leafs in diagrams of liver could be compared with tissues in liver in modern human anatomy, diagrams were not been affected by dissection from Yuan(元) to middle Qing(淸) dynasty. Conclusions : Lingshu(靈樞), Nanjing(難經) and Wang Bing(王冰) would had constantly acted on 29 diagrams of liver, since diagram of liver originated from Mingtangzangfutu, appeared first in Zhenjiujuying(鍼灸聚英). But they did not come from dissection during same periods.
Abstract
Objectives : The goal of this paper is to research what affected diagrams of liver originated from Mingtangzangfutu while they were changed. Methods : Diagrams of liver in Traditional Chinese and Japanese medical books had been gathered as many as possible. After they were divided into ones which were originated from Mingtangzangfutu and the others, diagrams originated from Mingtangzangfutu, were again classified into 4 filiations according to Huang Longxiang(黃龍祥)’s standard. Apart from his classification, they were analysed by 4 form factors, e.g. shape, number, veins and petiole of leafs. Results : Reliability of this methods had been confirmed by the correspondence with Huang’s 14 standard books, before 29 diagrams of liver were derived from 33 books including 13 books that Huang had already suggested. The lobes of liver in most of diagrams resembled 7 lanceolate or long oval leafs, or a maple leaf with 6 indentations, 4 left lobes and right 3 ones. In most of diagrams, veins of leafs were described variously, and petioles of leafs were drawn more shortly or longer. Analysing 29 diagrams by 4 form factors proved that Huang’s classification had crossing features among 4 filiations. This phenomenon implied the painters or doctors drawing diagrams might not convince if the shape of liver was correct or not. Although veins and petiole of leafs in diagrams of liver could be compared with tissues in liver in modern human anatomy, diagrams were not been affected by dissection from Yuan(元) to middle Qing(淸) dynasty. Conclusions : Lingshu(靈樞), Nanjing(難經) and Wang Bing(王冰) would had constantly acted on 29 diagrams of liver, since diagram of liver originated from Mingtangzangfutu, appeared first in Zhenjiujuying(鍼灸聚英). But they did not come from dissection during same periods.
참고문헌 (22)
- Han MS, "Nine viewpoint for reading art" (2011), Cheonga Publishing Co
- Hong WS, "Jeong Gyo Hwang Je Nae Gyeong Yeongchu" (1985), Dong Yang Ui Hag Yeon Gu Won
- Hua T., "Hua Tuo Xuan Men Nei Zhao Tu" (1976), Ziyou Publishing Co
- Huang LX, "Zhong Guo Zhen Jiu Shi Tu Jian(vol. 1)" (2003), Jingdao Publishing Co
- Ma S., "Huang Di Ne Jjing Ling Shu Zhu Zheng Fa Wei" (1981), Tailianguofeng Publishing Co
- Qian L., "Zang Fu Zheng Zhi Tu Shuo Ren Jing Jing(Gu Gong Zhen Ben Zong Kan vol. 71)" (2000), Hainan Publishing Co
- Qin YR, "Nanjing Ji Zhu" (1985), Taiwan Zhonghuashuju
- Wang B, "Zhong Guang Bu Zhu Hunag Di Nei Jing Su Wen(in Wang Bing Yi Xue Quan Shu)" (2006), Zhongguozhongyiyao Publishing Co
- Han BJ, "A Study on drawings in 『Dong-uibogam』", pp.2010
- Jeong WY, "Huh Jun's(許浚)Medical Thought Reflected Through the Figure of Body and Viscera(身形臟腑圖) in Donguibogam(東醫寶鑑)", Korean Journal of Oriental Physiology & Pathology, 10(2) (1996)
- Jin SY, "Research on Atlas of Viscera", Chinese Journal of Medical History, 24(2) (1994)
- 조학준, "三焦 形象圖의 비교", 대한한의학원전학회지, 28(3), pp.1~26 (2015), 대한한의학원전학회[DOI]
- 김대현, "『醫方類聚』에 인용된《五臟六腑圖》의 著者와 編制에 대한 고찰", 한국의사학회지, 16(1), pp.39~62 (2003), 한국의사학회
- Kim DH, "「Ojangyukbudo五臟六腑圖」 cited in 『Euibangyuchwi醫方類聚』: A Study in Terms of Medical History Science", pp.2006
- Kim TU, "A study on the Association between the Figure of Body and Viscera(身形臟腑圖) in Donguibogam(東醫寶鑑) and Essence, Spirit, Qi", The Journal Of Korean Qigong Medical Society, 10(1) (2007)
- 이명철, "明代 王圻의 ≪三才圖會≫ 臟腑圖에 대한 考察", 한국의사학회지, 20(2), pp.149~168 (2007), 한국의사학회
- Pan P, "A concise research into the history of “Mingtang Chart”", Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion, 24(5) (2008)
- 성민규, "身形藏府圖에 관한 비교 연구", 대한한의학원전학회지, 21(3), pp.165~176 (2008), 대한한의학원전학회
- Sung MG, "A study of Donguibogam ShinhyungJangbudo - a human body Figure of Donguibogam", pp.2009
- 신형장부도(身形藏府圖)의 지층발굴 -오장(五藏)의 성립과 전개를 중심으로-, "범한철학", 2012, 57~84, pp.범한철학회
- Yu X, "A Tentative Talk about the Ancient History of TCM Anatomy", Journal of Shandong University of TCM, 39(6) (2015)
- Jeongdam compilation committee, "Steps to internal medicine(vol. 6)" (2013), Jeongdam Publishing Co