본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한국의 유교화와 17세기: 도이힐러의 『한국 사회의 유교적 변환』과 그 해석

The Korean Version of Confucianization and the Significance of the Seventeenth Century:A Review of Martina Deuchler’s The Confucian Transformation of Korea

0

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류역사학

초록

With emphasis on the sudden acceleration of the Confucianization of seventeenth-century Korean society, this review article looks at Martina Deuchler’s The Confucianization of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology, (Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1992) and analyzes its significance, contributions, and some issues, including concepts of primogeniture, the longevity of the Chosŏn dynasty, mentalité methodology, and traditional/Confucian values. As for the motives of the Confucianization of Korean society, in addition to Martina Deuchler’s emphasis on ideological factors and Mark Peterson’s emphasis on socioeconomic factors, this article stresses the importance of the Manchu conquest of Korea and Ming China in the seventeenth century and the unique politico-intellectual trend it affected upon Korean ruling elites.

Abstract

With emphasis on the sudden acceleration of the Confucianization of seventeenth-century Korean society, this review article looks at Martina Deuchler’s The Confucianization of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology, (Cambridge: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1992) and analyzes its significance, contributions, and some issues, including concepts of primogeniture, the longevity of the Chosŏn dynasty, mentalité methodology, and traditional/Confucian values. As for the motives of the Confucianization of Korean society, in addition to Martina Deuchler’s emphasis on ideological factors and Mark Peterson’s emphasis on socioeconomic factors, this article stresses the importance of the Manchu conquest of Korea and Ming China in the seventeenth century and the unique politico-intellectual trend it affected upon Korean ruling elites.

참고문헌 (40)

  1. 계승범, "조선시대 동아시아 질서와 한중관계 in: 한중일 학계의 한중관계사 연구와 쟁점" (2009), 동북아역사재단
  2. 계승범, "조선시대 해외파병과 한중관계" (2009), 푸른역사
  3. 권연웅, "서평: 한국사회의 유교적 변환 ―숲으로 조망한 조선의 친족사회―", 교수신문 (2004)
  4. 김훈식, "한국사회의 유교적 변환", 역사와 경계, 52 (2004), 부산경남사학회
  5. 도이힐러 마르티나, "한국사회의 유교적 변환" (2003), 아카넷
  6. 도이힐러 마르티나, "‘나의 책을 말한다’ 코너", 한국사시민강좌, 15 (1994), 일조각
  7. 도이힐러 마르티나, "한국의 유교적 변화 ―포괄적 고찰― in: 한국사 연구방법의 새로운 모색" (2003), 경인문화사
  8. 배상훈, "조선후기 분할상속관행의 지속에 대한 소고", 한국민족문화, (34), pp.203~235 (2009), 한국민족문화연구소
  9. 백승종, "서평: Martina Deuchler, The Confucian Transformation of Korea. A Study of Society and Ideology」", 歷史學報, 141 (1994), 역사학회
  10. 宋時烈, "宋子大全" (1985), 보경문화사
  11. 宋俊浩, "朝鮮社會史硏究" (1988), 일조각
  12. 윤영인, "서구 학계 조공제도 이론의 중국 중심적 문화론 비판", 아세아연구, 109 (2002), 고려대학교 아세아문제연구소
  13. 鄭杜熙, "朝鮮時代 人物의 再發見" (1997), 일조각
  14. 鄭杜熙, "嫡長子 중심의 家父長的 朝鮮社會의 成立과 그 性格 in: 美國에서의 韓國史 硏究" (1999), 국학자료원
  15. 鄭玉子, "조선후기 조선중화사상연구" (1998), 일지사
  16. 崔在錫, "韓國家族制度史硏究" (1983), 일지사
  17. 崔在錫, "17世紀의 親族構造의 變化", 정신문화연구, 24 (1985), 정신문화연구원
  18. 崔在錫, "朝鮮中期 家族·親族制의‘再構造化’", 韓國의 社會와 文化, 21 (1993), 정신문화연구원
  19. 최재석, "도이힐러의 한국 사회사 연구 비판: 선행연구와 관련하여", 한국사회사학회논문집(1-50), (67), pp.332~354 (2005), 한국사회사학회
  20. 최홍기, "조선 전기 가부장제와 여성" (2004), 아카넷
  21. 한명기, "‘再造之恩’과 조선후기 정치사― 임진왜란~정조대 시기를 중심으로", 대동문화연구, 57(59), pp.191~230 (2007), 대동문화연구원
  22. 함한희, "「서평: 한국사회의 유교적 변환 ―이상과 실제 사이의 갈등 설명 못해―」, 『교수신문』 (2004년 2월 23일)", ~ (2004)
  23. "Asian Studies Newsletter", Association for Asian Studies, 54(2) (2009)
  24. h'oe, Yong-ho, "Review: Martina Deuchler, The Confucianization of Korea", Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, 38(1) (1995), E. J. Brill
  25. Duncan, John B., "Review: The Confucianization of Korea, by Martina Deuchler", Harvard Journal of Asiatic Studies, 56(1) (1996), Harvard-Yenching Institute
  26. Duncan, John B., "The Origins of the Chosŏn Dynasty" (2000), University of Washington
  27. Deuchler, Martina, "The Confucian Transformation of Korea: A Study of Society and Ideology" (1992), Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University
  28. Grayson, James H., "Asian Affairs, v. 25, no. 1, (London: Royal Society for Asian Affairs. 1994)", ~ (1994)
  29. Haboush, JaHyun Kim, "A Heritage of Kings: One Man's Monarchy in the Confucian World" (1988), Columbia University Press
  30. Hastings, Sally Ann, "The Historian", 57(4) (1995), Historical Association
  31. Kalton, Michael C., "Review: The Confucianization of Korea, by Martina Deuchler", The Journal of Asian Studies, 53(1) (1994)
  32. Kawashima, Fujiya, "Review: Martina Deuchler, The Confucianization of Korea", American Historical Review, 99(2) (1994), American Historical Association
  33. Kye, Seung B., "The Posthumous Image and Role of Ming Taizu in Korean Politics in: Long Live the Emperor! Uses of the Ming Founder across Six Centuries of East Asian History" (2008), Society for Ming Studies
  34. Kye, Seung B., "Confucian Perspectives on Egalitarian Thought in Traditional Korea", International Journal of Korean Studies, 12 (2008), Korea University
  35. Palais, James B., "Politics and Policy in Traditional Korea" (1975), Harvard University Press
  36. Palais, James B., "Confucian Statecraft and Korean Institutions: Yu Hyŏngwŏn and the Late Chosŏn Dynasty" (1996), University of Washington Press
  37. Peterson, Mark, "Korean Adoption and Inheritance: Case Studies in the Creation of a Classic Confucian Society" (1996), Cornell University
  38. Setton, Mark, "Chŏng Yagyong: Korea's Challenge to Orthodox Neo-Confucianism" (1997), State University of New York Press
  39. Wagner, Edward W., "The Literati Purges: Political Conflict in Early Yi Korea" (1974), East Asian Research Center, Harvard University
  40. "Review: The Confucianization of Korea, by Martina Deuchler", Philosophy East and West, 44(3) (1994), University of Hawaii Press

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)