문헌정보학 분야 연구의 국제적 성과와 격차에 대한 분석
An Analysis of International Achievements and Inequality in Research in the Field of Library and Information Science
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구는 지난 20년간 LIS(Library & Information Science) 분야 국제 저널에 출판된 논문의 산출 성과를 살펴보고 국제적 격차와 그 변화를 이해하였다. 더불어 학술 논문의 상위 생산 국가를 중심으로 학술 출판 특징을 시각화하고, 하위 연구 영역에 따른 차이도 확인하였다. 분석 결과 첫 번째, 최근 5년간의 논문 출판은 미국과 중국이 주도하고 있으나, 네덜란드가 생산한 논문에서 상대적으로 높은 영향력과 국제 및 산업체 협력 성과가 나타났다. 두 번째, 지난 20년간 논문 생산 및 피인용량에 있어서는 높은 국가 간 격차 지수가(g = 0.7-0.8) 유지되고 있으나, CR3(Concentration Ration 3)은 63.3%에서 43.2%로, HHI는 2,129.6에서 976.1로 감소해, 상위 국가 집중도는 시간이 지남에 따라 완화되는 추세를 나타냈다. 세 번째, LS(Library Science) 분야는 가장 높은 국가 간 격차와 미국 중심의 높은 집중도가 나타났으며, SM(Scientometrics) 분야는 논문 생산 기여국이 가장 분산되어 있는 것으로 확인되었다.
Abstract
This study examined the output performance of papers published in international journals in the LIS field over the past 20 years and used the Gini coefficient and Hirschman-Herfindahl (HHI) index to understand the international gap in academic paper output and its changes. In addition, the characteristics of academic publications were visualized focusing on the top producing countries of academic papers, and differences according to sub-research areas were also identified. As a result of the analysis, first, although the United States and China are leading the publication of papers over the past five years, the results produced by the Netherlands showed relatively high influence and international and industrial cooperation results. Second, a high inter-country gap index (g= 0.7-0.8) has been maintained in terms of paper production and citation volume over the past 20 years, but the concentration of top countries is showing a trend of easing over time, as CR3 (Concentration Ration 3) decreased from 63.3% to 43.2%, HHI decreased from 2,129.6 to 976.1. Third, the LS field showed the highest gap between countries and a high degree of concentration centered on the United States, while the SM field was confirmed to be the most dispersed.
참고문헌 (32)
- 김준혁, "다양성지표를 활용한 우리나라 국제학술논문의 다학제연구 특성분석", 융합연구리뷰, 2(2), pp.34~79 (2016)
- 박노경, "은행합병과 시장집중도분석 : CR4와 H-H분석중심", 산업경제연구, 15(1), pp.152~142 (2002)
- 박주연, "미디어 시장의 다양성 연구 : 시장집중도 측정을 중심으로", 언론정보연구, 46(1), pp.37~61 (2009)[DOI]
- 백일, "한국 영화 유통문제와 대책", 마르크스주의 연구, 14(3), pp.169~204 (2017)[DOI]
- 성욱제, "국내 시사정보 미디어의 이용집중도 측정을 통한 다양성 연구", 방송통신연구, 72, pp.194~225 (2010)[DOI]
- 양현채, "정부 R&D 시스템상 경쟁과 제한효과에 대한 제도적재해석 및 대응방안" (2018), 과학기술정책연구원
- "기업집중률(CR, Concentration Ratio)" (2012), 연합인포맥스[URL]
- 이재우, "허핀달 지수는 CRk 집중지수 보다 우월한가 : 가설 검증 및 정책적 함의", 경제학연구, 48(1), pp.5~33 (2000)
- 조영신, "시장 획정별 미디어 시장 집중도 분석", 사이버커뮤니케이션학보, 27(2), pp.215~252 (2010)
- 차성훈, "시장구조의 이해", 클릭경제교육, 70 (2009), 클릭경제교육
- "Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) Definition, formula, and example" (2023)[URL]
- Chang, Y. W., "Comparison of disciplines, topics, and methods in studies in Journal of Informetrics and Scientometrics from 2016 to 2020", Scientometrics, 129, pp.1415~1439 (2024)[DOI]
- Cho, J., "Analysis of global inequality in research outcome using the Gini coefficient", Performance Measurement and Metrics, 22(1), pp.25~37 (2021)[DOI]
- "Indicator Handbook" (2021)[URL]
- "Scientometrics Using Open Data" (2024)[URL]
- "A macro level scientometric analysis of world tribology research output" (2018)[URL]
- Feyzabadi, VY., "Measuring research inequality in medical sciences universities of Iran from 2008 to 2017 : a descriptive study", Iranian Journal of Epidemiology, 14, pp.27~39 (2019)
- Hsiao, TM., "The dynamics of research subfields for library and information science: an investigation based on word bibliographic coupling", Scientometrics, 125, pp.717~737 (2020)[DOI]
- Huang, M., "The trend of concentration in scientific research and technological innovation: a reduction of the predominant role of the U.S. in world research & technology", Journal of Informetrics, 6(4), pp.457~468 (2012)[DOI]
- Huang, M., "One category, two communities : subfield differences in"Information Science and Library Science", Scientometrics, 119(2), pp.1059~1079 (2019)[DOI]
- Jeon, J., "Is the gap widening among universities? on research output inequality and its measurement in the Korean higher education system", Quallty &Quantity, 52, pp.589~606 (2018)[DOI]
- Kwiek, M., "The prestige economy of higher education journals : a quantitative approach higher education", The International Journal of Higher Education Research, 81(3), pp.493~519 (2021)[DOI]
- Larivière, V., "The decline in the concentration of citations, 1900-2007", Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), pp.858~862 (2009)[DOI]
- Leydesdorff, L., "Is the United States losing ground in science? a global perspective on the world science system", Scientometrics, 78, pp.23~36 (2009)[DOI]
- Merton, R. K., "Matthew effect in science : reward and communication systems of science are considered", Science, 159(3810), pp.56~63 (1968)
- Ni, C., "Journal clustering through interlocking editorship information", Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 47, pp.1~10 (2010)[DOI]
- Park, E., "Inequality in scientific impact : evidence from the hospitality and tourism literature", Tourism & Leisure Research, 33(2), pp.385~406 (2021)[DOI]
- Sin, S., "Are library and information science journals becoming more internationalized?:a longitudinal study of authors' geographical affiliations in 20 lis journals from 1981 to 2003", Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology (2006)[DOI]
- Wu, J., "Distributions of scientific funding across universities and research disciplines", Journal of Informetrics, 9(1), pp.183~196 (2015)[DOI]
- Xie, Y., "Information Science and Library Science(IS-LS)journal subject categorization and comparison based on editorship information", Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), pp.101069~ (2020)[DOI]
- Yu, B., "The Matthew Effect in China’s social sciences and humanities research : a comparative analysis of CSSCI and SSCI", Scientometrics, 128, pp.6177~6193 (2023)[DOI]
- Zhi, Q., "Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output : an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China", Scientometrics, 106, pp.603~628 (2016)[DOI]