새만금사업의 정책논증에 관한 연구: 찬성논증과 반대논증의 비교를 중심으로
A Study on the Policy Argument of Saemangeum Project - Focused on the Comparison of Argument for and against Saemangeum Project -
0
조회
0
다운로드
10
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
It can be said that Saemangeum Project, grand construction project to connect the city of Gunsan and the county of Buan in Jeollabukdo province and to create 40,100ha of land as well as a water reservoir, is the representative case of policy conflict or environmental conflict in Korea. It took approximately 15 years to complete the sea-dike construction as there have been many pros and cons presented regarding the project amongst NGO groups and the government. The Supreme Court made the final decision to continue this project. This study analyzes the argumentation structure how both parties is evolved their claim based on the warrants. The argument for and against the project may be divided into three sub-argument; economic effect, quality of water in reservoir and river, the possibility of maritime pollution. Governments were argued that the project had appropriate economic effect, would be satisfied the quality of water and lowered the possibility of maritime pollution, But NGO and religious body were argued the view diametrically opposed. In this argumentation, it was lead to social loss, but may be said to evolve the project.
Abstract
It can be said that Saemangeum Project, grand construction project to connect the city of Gunsan and the county of Buan in Jeollabukdo province and to create 40,100ha of land as well as a water reservoir, is the representative case of policy conflict or environmental conflict in Korea. It took approximately 15 years to complete the sea-dike construction as there have been many pros and cons presented regarding the project amongst NGO groups and the government. The Supreme Court made the final decision to continue this project. This study analyzes the argumentation structure how both parties is evolved their claim based on the warrants. The argument for and against the project may be divided into three sub-argument; economic effect, quality of water in reservoir and river, the possibility of maritime pollution. Governments were argued that the project had appropriate economic effect, would be satisfied the quality of water and lowered the possibility of maritime pollution, But NGO and religious body were argued the view diametrically opposed. In this argumentation, it was lead to social loss, but may be said to evolve the project.
참고문헌 (30)
- 강근복, "정책논증의 구조", 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 논문집, (창간), pp.155~168 (1990)
- 권기헌, "정책학" (2009), 박영사
- 권명화, "호주제 폐지에 관한 논변구조 분석: 문화이론과 정책논변모형을 중심으로", 한국정책학회보, 15(3), pp.203~240 (2006), 한국정책학회
- 김길수, "새만금사업의 환경갈등에 관한 연구", 한국자치행정학보, 21(2), pp.145~168 (2007)
- 김길수, "정책담론과 정책논증에 관한 연구", 한국자치행정학보, 25(3), pp.177~193 (2011), 한국자치행정학회
- 문경민, "새만금 리포트" (2000), 중앙 M & B
- 박준호, "논리와 논증의 이해" (2003), 한국문화사
- 박준호, "비형식 논리학의 논증과 논증 평가 개념", 범한철학, 34(3), pp.151~175 (2004), 범한철학회
- 서휘석, "지방정부간 갈등조정에 관한 연구 - 옥정호 갈등과 35사단 이전 갈의 비교를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 13(2), pp.445~466 (2009), 한국비교정부학회
- 신무섭, "국책사업 추진과 국가예산 확보를 위한 지방자치단체의 활동에 관한 사례연구 - 새만금 신항 개발 사업을 중심으로 -", 한국자치행정학보, 25(3), pp.1~19 (2011), 한국자치행정학회
- 신윤창, "폐광지역발전을 위한 폐특법 연장의 논리 - 경제적 효과의 손실분석을 중심으로 -", 한국비교정부학보, 15(3), pp.295~318 (2011), 한국비교정부학회
- 오영석, "정책논증의 구조와 방법" (2008), 동국대학교 경주캠퍼스
- 오영석, "정책논증의 구조에 관한 고찰", 한국행정논집, 21(1), pp.287~310 (2009), 한국정부학회
- 유민봉, "정책분석틀로서의 정책논변모형", 한국행정학보, 28(4), pp.1175~1190 (1991)
- 유민봉, "정책논변모형을 통한 이율규제의 대안 분석", 한국행정학보, 26(2), pp.493~520 (1992)
- 임형백, "새만금 관광개발을 위한 정책연구 -관광산업의 타당성 검토를 중심으로-", 한국비교정부학보, 13(2), pp.511~532 (2009), 한국비교정부학회
- 주상현, "지방정부간 정책갈등 분석과 관리 전략에 관한 연구", 한국비교정부학보, 15(2), pp.343~368 (2011), 한국비교정부학회
- 최봉문, "환경갈등관리에 관한 연구 : 새만금사업 사례를 중심으로", 박사, pp.2009
- 서울행정법원, "2001구합33561 정부조치계획등 판결문", ~ (2005)
- 서울고등법원, "2005누4412 정부조치계획취소등 판결문", ~ (2005)
- 대법원, "2006en330 정부조치계획취소등 판결문", ~ (2006)
- Dunn, W. N., "Public Policy Analysis : An Introduction" (1994), Prentice Hall
- Fisher, F., "Evaluating Public Policy" (1995), Nelson-Hall
- Gasper D. R., "Analyzing Argumentation in Planning and Public Policy: Assessing, Improving, and Transcending the Toulmin Model", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, pp.367~390 (1998)
- Gasper, D., "Structures and Meanings" (2000), Institute of Social Science
- Kumar, S, Pallathucheril, "Analyzing Planning and Design Discourses", Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31, pp.829~846 (2004)
- Majone, "Evidence, Argument and Persuasion in the Policy Process" (1989), Yale University Press
- Paris, D. C., "The Logic of Policy Inquiry" (1983), Longman Inc
- Toulmin, S., "An Introduction to Reasoning" (1979), Macmillan
- William, M. J., "논증의 탄생" (2009), 홍문관